Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Mobile Health Solutions for Behavioral Skill Implementation Through Homework (MHealth)

27 febbraio 2020 aggiornato da: Mary M. McKay, NYU Silver School of Social Work

The goal of this two-year R34 treatment development grant is to develop a mobile health (mHealth) application that will both advance theory in and clinical practice of homework (HW) implementation.

HW can be described as between-session exercises where the client practices specific skills learned within-session in order to promote skill acquisition, which ultimately leads to improved acute- as well as longer-term therapeutic benefits on targeted outcomes, generalization of treatment effects and maintenance of treatment gains. Despite data demonstrating that HW is critical to achieving maximal benefits from evidence-based treatments, very little theory-driven approaches have been conducted focusing on improving the HW process. Through utilizing self-determination theory as a guiding framework and integrating principles from the field of "gamification" and goal-setting, the aim is to develop a two-component mHealth HW application (My MFG).

The first component focuses on delivering HW via a highly engaging, multiplayer, interactive, cooperative, and skill-building game platform aimed at improving the "Design" and "Do" process of HW. The second component focuses on targeting factors putatively related to poor HW implementation within the "Do" process.

The process of the development of My MFG will be guided by the clinic and community development model and iterative software development process to maximize the feasibility and sustainability of My MFG within practice settings often characterized by limited resources. Findings from this study have broad implications for evidence-based treatments for youth and adult mental health disorders that emphasize HW as the link between treatment and improvements in targeted outcomes.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

The aim of the proposed study is to develop a theory-informed mobile health (mHealth) application for urban caregivers attempting to improve their children's oppositional and conduct related difficulties (i.e., disruptive behavior disorders; DBDs). The majority of evidence-based treatments (EBTs) targeting youth DBDs emphasize change in specific parenting/family-level processes empirically linked to the maintenance of DBDs. Existing EBTs frequently include at-home-practice-exercises (i.e., homework; HW) to reinforce parent skill acquisition and maximize use of new skills with children at home. Poor quantity and quality of HW completed by parents significantly attenuates the effect of EBTs. This is a significant limiting-factor in many EBTs attaining full public health impact. Given the robust effect of HW on outcomes from EBTs across a range of behavioral health difficulties and populations, there is a call for moving beyond the question of whether HW is important to questions such as what processes are involved in HW implementation and how best to support these processes. Minimal investigation has been focused on these critical questions.

A model of HW has recently been proposed to better understand the process of HW implementation, as well as guide critically needed supports for at-home practice exercises.

This model proposes four HW processes:

  1. Designing;
  2. Assigning;
  3. Doing, and;
  4. Reviewing.

The DADR model proposes that specific social, cognitive and behavioral factors related to the HW task, as well as to the provider and the adult caregiver may affect the quality of each phase and ultimately to the quantity and quality of HW completed. Methods to better understand, support, and impact these processes are essential to advancing theory and offering solutions to HW completion.

Through features available on smartphones (e.g., camera/video/voice recording; simple message service; internet-access; global positioning system), there are novel methods to interface with and support clients outside of defined treatment sessions. Through the use of these features, mHealth applications can be used to engage, educate, connect, track, and remind clients. These applications can use push (send communications) or pull (client's access tools on their own) mechanisms to engage the client in behavioral change activity. mHealth applications that integrate push and pull methods offer a significant opportunity to enhance outcomes across a range of health and behavioral health challenges and populations.

The goal of this two-year R34 treatment development grant is in response to RFA-MH-13-061 (Harnessing advanced health technologies to drive mental health improvement) to develop a mHealth application that will both advance theory in and clinical practice guided by the DADR model of HW implementation. Specifically we aim to utilize mHealth to improve the "Design" and "Do" process of HW within the context of the Family Groups for Youth with Behavioral Difficulties (MFG) intervention, an EBT for DBDs in youth and their families who seek assistance at outpatient mental health clinics in urban communities. To date, efforts at utilizing mHealth within the context of HW have been minimal and have not taken a systematic, theory-driven approach, thereby limiting the advance of knowledge and clinical application. Through utilizing self-determination theory as a guiding framework and integrating principles from the field of "gamification" and goal-setting, the aim is to develop a two-component MFG mHealth HW application (My MFG). The first component focuses on delivering MFG HW via a highly engaging, multiplayer, interactive, cooperative, and skill-building game platform aimed at improving the "Design" and "Do" process. The second component focuses on targeting factors putatively related to poor HW implementation within the "Do" process.

The process of the development of My MFG will be guided by the clinic and community development model and iterative software development process to maximize the feasibility and sustainability of My MFG within practice settings often characterized by limited resources. The specific aims of this project are to:

  1. Develop My MFG through an iterative process informed by the perspectives of key stakeholders
  2. Determine the impact of MFG plus My MFG relative to MFG-alone on the DADR process and HW quantity and quality. It is hypothesized that the MFG plus My MFG will result in:

    1. Greater quality of the "Design" and "Do" process rated by therapists, parents, and independent coders
    2. Greater quantity and quality of HW assignments rated by therapists and parents
    3. Greater quality of the "Review" process as rated by therapists, parents, and independent coders as a function of improved HW quantity and quality
    4. Greater satisfaction with treatment as rated by the parent, target child, and therapists NIMH has specifically called for acceleration of research to maximize the ability of current treatments to reduce symptoms, improve adherence and functioning while improving quality of and lowering the cost of care. The mHealth application and methods proposed herein serve as systematic, theory-driven approaches to significantly advance understanding of how best to support the HW process-a common element of many EBTs across various disorders and populations-ultimately resulting in greater effectiveness of EBTs, maintenance and generalization of behavioral skills learned during EBTs.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Anticipato)

96

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • New York
      • New York, New York, Stati Uniti, 10003
        • McSilver Institute for Poverty Policy and Research - New York University Silver School of Social Work

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

Da 7 anni a 13 anni (Bambino)

Accetta volontari sani

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

1) youth between the ages of 7 to 13 years and an accompanying adult primary caregiver available to participate in the research and intervention activities 2) English speaking youth and adult caregiver and 3) youth meeting criteria for DBD via parent reports based on the Disruptive Behavior Disorder (DBD) rating scales of DSM symptoms and cross-situational impairment as assessed through parent ratings on the Impairment Rating Scale (IRS). Children will be diagnosed with DBD if they meet DSM symptom criteria for DBD by parent report (i.e., at least four symptoms of ODD or 3 symptoms of CD), and impairment ratings indicate at least one impairment domain.

-

Exclusion Criteria:

Children will also be excluded if there is:

  • Evidence of psychosis
  • If the youth or adult caregiver presents with emergency psychiatric needs that require services beyond that which can be managed within an outpatient setting (e.g. hospitalization, specialized placement outside the home), active intervention by clinic and research staff to secure what is needed will be made
  • Children will not be excluded if they participate in other psychosocial or pharmacological interventions.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: N / A
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione di gruppo singolo
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: MFG plus MyMFG

MFG plus MyMFG will be tested and the aim is:

  1. Greater quality of the "Design" and "Do" process rated by therapists, parents, and independent coders.
  2. Greater quantity and quality of HW assignments rated by therapists and parents.
  3. Greater quality of the "Review" process as rated by therapists, parents, and independent coders.
  4. Greater satisfaction with treatment as rated by the parent, target child, and therapists.

Specific aim is to utilize mHealth to improve the "Design" and "Do" process of HW within the context of the Family Groups for Youth with Behavioral Difficulties (MFG) intervention, an EBT for DBDs in youth and their families who seek assistance at outpatient mental health clinics in urban communities.

The first component focuses on delivering HW via a highly engaging, multiplayer, interactive, cooperative, and skill-building game platform aimed at improving the "Design" and "Do" process of HW. The second component focuses on targeting factors putatively related to poor HW implementation within the "Do" process.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
DADR Process- HW quantity and quality, Homework Rating Scale-II
Lasso di tempo: Weekly for 16 weeks; duration of group
This assessment helps to understand the DADR process and to assess if homework was completed and how much.
Weekly for 16 weeks; duration of group
DADR Proces- Homework Adherence and Competence Scales
Lasso di tempo: Participants will be tracked up to 16 weeks and feedback will be collected every week.
An independent observer will assess level of homework adherence and competence in every session.
Participants will be tracked up to 16 weeks and feedback will be collected every week.

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
DBD Symptoms -DBD Rating Scale
Lasso di tempo: Day 1- 1st contact
To assess the severity of behavior problems.
Day 1- 1st contact
Children's Impairment Rating Scale
Lasso di tempo: Day 1- 1st Contact
To assess level of behavioral impairment for child- caregiver reports.
Day 1- 1st Contact
Attendance
Lasso di tempo: Weekly- duration of the 16 week group
Attendance will be measured for each participant at every session.
Weekly- duration of the 16 week group
IOWA Conners Oppositional/Defiant Scale
Lasso di tempo: 1st contact and at the end of the 16 week group
Caregiver assesses child's oppostitional and defiant behaviors at pre and post treatment.
1st contact and at the end of the 16 week group
Consumer Satisfaction & Feedback- Treatment Attitude Inventory
Lasso di tempo: 1st contact and at the end of the 16 week group
This is a feedback assesment that will happen at either group or individual consultancy meeting to assess feedback of the MHealth process by parent, target child, and therapist.
1st contact and at the end of the 16 week group

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Mary M McKay, PhD, New York University Silver School of Social Work
  • Direttore dello studio: Tyrone M Parchment, LMSW, New York University Silver School of Social Work
  • Direttore dello studio: Ozge Sensoy-Bahar, PhD, New York University Silver School of Social Work

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

1 novembre 2015

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 maggio 2016

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 giugno 2016

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

18 luglio 2013

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

5 agosto 2013

Primo Inserito (Stima)

7 agosto 2013

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

2 marzo 2020

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

27 febbraio 2020

Ultimo verificato

1 febbraio 2020

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • R34MH100407-01 (Sovvenzione/contratto NIH degli Stati Uniti)

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Salute mentale Benessere 1

Prove cliniche su MFG plus MyMFG

Sottoscrivi