Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Mobile Health Solutions for Behavioral Skill Implementation Through Homework (MHealth)

27 de febrero de 2020 actualizado por: Mary M. McKay, NYU Silver School of Social Work

The goal of this two-year R34 treatment development grant is to develop a mobile health (mHealth) application that will both advance theory in and clinical practice of homework (HW) implementation.

HW can be described as between-session exercises where the client practices specific skills learned within-session in order to promote skill acquisition, which ultimately leads to improved acute- as well as longer-term therapeutic benefits on targeted outcomes, generalization of treatment effects and maintenance of treatment gains. Despite data demonstrating that HW is critical to achieving maximal benefits from evidence-based treatments, very little theory-driven approaches have been conducted focusing on improving the HW process. Through utilizing self-determination theory as a guiding framework and integrating principles from the field of "gamification" and goal-setting, the aim is to develop a two-component mHealth HW application (My MFG).

The first component focuses on delivering HW via a highly engaging, multiplayer, interactive, cooperative, and skill-building game platform aimed at improving the "Design" and "Do" process of HW. The second component focuses on targeting factors putatively related to poor HW implementation within the "Do" process.

The process of the development of My MFG will be guided by the clinic and community development model and iterative software development process to maximize the feasibility and sustainability of My MFG within practice settings often characterized by limited resources. Findings from this study have broad implications for evidence-based treatments for youth and adult mental health disorders that emphasize HW as the link between treatment and improvements in targeted outcomes.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

The aim of the proposed study is to develop a theory-informed mobile health (mHealth) application for urban caregivers attempting to improve their children's oppositional and conduct related difficulties (i.e., disruptive behavior disorders; DBDs). The majority of evidence-based treatments (EBTs) targeting youth DBDs emphasize change in specific parenting/family-level processes empirically linked to the maintenance of DBDs. Existing EBTs frequently include at-home-practice-exercises (i.e., homework; HW) to reinforce parent skill acquisition and maximize use of new skills with children at home. Poor quantity and quality of HW completed by parents significantly attenuates the effect of EBTs. This is a significant limiting-factor in many EBTs attaining full public health impact. Given the robust effect of HW on outcomes from EBTs across a range of behavioral health difficulties and populations, there is a call for moving beyond the question of whether HW is important to questions such as what processes are involved in HW implementation and how best to support these processes. Minimal investigation has been focused on these critical questions.

A model of HW has recently been proposed to better understand the process of HW implementation, as well as guide critically needed supports for at-home practice exercises.

This model proposes four HW processes:

  1. Designing;
  2. Assigning;
  3. Doing, and;
  4. Reviewing.

The DADR model proposes that specific social, cognitive and behavioral factors related to the HW task, as well as to the provider and the adult caregiver may affect the quality of each phase and ultimately to the quantity and quality of HW completed. Methods to better understand, support, and impact these processes are essential to advancing theory and offering solutions to HW completion.

Through features available on smartphones (e.g., camera/video/voice recording; simple message service; internet-access; global positioning system), there are novel methods to interface with and support clients outside of defined treatment sessions. Through the use of these features, mHealth applications can be used to engage, educate, connect, track, and remind clients. These applications can use push (send communications) or pull (client's access tools on their own) mechanisms to engage the client in behavioral change activity. mHealth applications that integrate push and pull methods offer a significant opportunity to enhance outcomes across a range of health and behavioral health challenges and populations.

The goal of this two-year R34 treatment development grant is in response to RFA-MH-13-061 (Harnessing advanced health technologies to drive mental health improvement) to develop a mHealth application that will both advance theory in and clinical practice guided by the DADR model of HW implementation. Specifically we aim to utilize mHealth to improve the "Design" and "Do" process of HW within the context of the Family Groups for Youth with Behavioral Difficulties (MFG) intervention, an EBT for DBDs in youth and their families who seek assistance at outpatient mental health clinics in urban communities. To date, efforts at utilizing mHealth within the context of HW have been minimal and have not taken a systematic, theory-driven approach, thereby limiting the advance of knowledge and clinical application. Through utilizing self-determination theory as a guiding framework and integrating principles from the field of "gamification" and goal-setting, the aim is to develop a two-component MFG mHealth HW application (My MFG). The first component focuses on delivering MFG HW via a highly engaging, multiplayer, interactive, cooperative, and skill-building game platform aimed at improving the "Design" and "Do" process. The second component focuses on targeting factors putatively related to poor HW implementation within the "Do" process.

The process of the development of My MFG will be guided by the clinic and community development model and iterative software development process to maximize the feasibility and sustainability of My MFG within practice settings often characterized by limited resources. The specific aims of this project are to:

  1. Develop My MFG through an iterative process informed by the perspectives of key stakeholders
  2. Determine the impact of MFG plus My MFG relative to MFG-alone on the DADR process and HW quantity and quality. It is hypothesized that the MFG plus My MFG will result in:

    1. Greater quality of the "Design" and "Do" process rated by therapists, parents, and independent coders
    2. Greater quantity and quality of HW assignments rated by therapists and parents
    3. Greater quality of the "Review" process as rated by therapists, parents, and independent coders as a function of improved HW quantity and quality
    4. Greater satisfaction with treatment as rated by the parent, target child, and therapists NIMH has specifically called for acceleration of research to maximize the ability of current treatments to reduce symptoms, improve adherence and functioning while improving quality of and lowering the cost of care. The mHealth application and methods proposed herein serve as systematic, theory-driven approaches to significantly advance understanding of how best to support the HW process-a common element of many EBTs across various disorders and populations-ultimately resulting in greater effectiveness of EBTs, maintenance and generalization of behavioral skills learned during EBTs.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Anticipado)

96

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • New York
      • New York, New York, Estados Unidos, 10003
        • McSilver Institute for Poverty Policy and Research - New York University Silver School of Social Work

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

7 años a 13 años (Niño)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

1) youth between the ages of 7 to 13 years and an accompanying adult primary caregiver available to participate in the research and intervention activities 2) English speaking youth and adult caregiver and 3) youth meeting criteria for DBD via parent reports based on the Disruptive Behavior Disorder (DBD) rating scales of DSM symptoms and cross-situational impairment as assessed through parent ratings on the Impairment Rating Scale (IRS). Children will be diagnosed with DBD if they meet DSM symptom criteria for DBD by parent report (i.e., at least four symptoms of ODD or 3 symptoms of CD), and impairment ratings indicate at least one impairment domain.

-

Exclusion Criteria:

Children will also be excluded if there is:

  • Evidence of psychosis
  • If the youth or adult caregiver presents with emergency psychiatric needs that require services beyond that which can be managed within an outpatient setting (e.g. hospitalization, specialized placement outside the home), active intervention by clinic and research staff to secure what is needed will be made
  • Children will not be excluded if they participate in other psychosocial or pharmacological interventions.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: MFG plus MyMFG

MFG plus MyMFG will be tested and the aim is:

  1. Greater quality of the "Design" and "Do" process rated by therapists, parents, and independent coders.
  2. Greater quantity and quality of HW assignments rated by therapists and parents.
  3. Greater quality of the "Review" process as rated by therapists, parents, and independent coders.
  4. Greater satisfaction with treatment as rated by the parent, target child, and therapists.

Specific aim is to utilize mHealth to improve the "Design" and "Do" process of HW within the context of the Family Groups for Youth with Behavioral Difficulties (MFG) intervention, an EBT for DBDs in youth and their families who seek assistance at outpatient mental health clinics in urban communities.

The first component focuses on delivering HW via a highly engaging, multiplayer, interactive, cooperative, and skill-building game platform aimed at improving the "Design" and "Do" process of HW. The second component focuses on targeting factors putatively related to poor HW implementation within the "Do" process.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
DADR Process- HW quantity and quality, Homework Rating Scale-II
Periodo de tiempo: Weekly for 16 weeks; duration of group
This assessment helps to understand the DADR process and to assess if homework was completed and how much.
Weekly for 16 weeks; duration of group
DADR Proces- Homework Adherence and Competence Scales
Periodo de tiempo: Participants will be tracked up to 16 weeks and feedback will be collected every week.
An independent observer will assess level of homework adherence and competence in every session.
Participants will be tracked up to 16 weeks and feedback will be collected every week.

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
DBD Symptoms -DBD Rating Scale
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1- 1st contact
To assess the severity of behavior problems.
Day 1- 1st contact
Children's Impairment Rating Scale
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1- 1st Contact
To assess level of behavioral impairment for child- caregiver reports.
Day 1- 1st Contact
Attendance
Periodo de tiempo: Weekly- duration of the 16 week group
Attendance will be measured for each participant at every session.
Weekly- duration of the 16 week group
IOWA Conners Oppositional/Defiant Scale
Periodo de tiempo: 1st contact and at the end of the 16 week group
Caregiver assesses child's oppostitional and defiant behaviors at pre and post treatment.
1st contact and at the end of the 16 week group
Consumer Satisfaction & Feedback- Treatment Attitude Inventory
Periodo de tiempo: 1st contact and at the end of the 16 week group
This is a feedback assesment that will happen at either group or individual consultancy meeting to assess feedback of the MHealth process by parent, target child, and therapist.
1st contact and at the end of the 16 week group

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Mary M McKay, PhD, New York University Silver School of Social Work
  • Director de estudio: Tyrone M Parchment, LMSW, New York University Silver School of Social Work
  • Director de estudio: Ozge Sensoy-Bahar, PhD, New York University Silver School of Social Work

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de noviembre de 2015

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de mayo de 2016

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de junio de 2016

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

18 de julio de 2013

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

5 de agosto de 2013

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

7 de agosto de 2013

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

2 de marzo de 2020

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

27 de febrero de 2020

Última verificación

1 de febrero de 2020

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Palabras clave

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • R34MH100407-01 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir