A Pilot Trial of Patient Decision Aids for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICDs)
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Specific Aim 1: Examine acceptability and feasibility of a toolkit of patient decision aids (PtDAs) for patients with heart failure referred for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using a randomized control trial design across three diverse health care systems (Kaiser Colorado, The University of Colorado, and The Denver Veterans Hospital).
- Measure the acceptability of the decision aids
- Explore feasibility by measuring patient participation rates and adherence to the study protocol across all three sites.
- Conduct a preliminary assessment of outcomes by measuring changes in decision quality (knowledge and value concordance), quality of life, depressive symptoms, health status, and spiritual well-being.
Specific Aim 2: Determine the relative value of the various tools in the toolkit through in-depth interviews from study participants and providers at each intervention site
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, États-Unis, 80045
- University of Colorado Hospital (UCH)
-
Denver, Colorado, États-Unis, 80220
- Denver VA Medical Center
-
Denver, Colorado, États-Unis, 80218
- Kaiser Permanente of Colorado
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- systolic heart failure (defined as an ejection fraction less than 35%)
- have been referred for a primary prevention ICD
- Note: Patients referred for an ICD with cardiac resynchronization therapy are NOT excluded.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Already have an ICD
- Non-English speaking (as the tools we have developed are only available in English currently)
- Other ICD indications (e.g. secondary prevention, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy)
- Cognitive Impairment defined only as people with an inability to consent
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Recherche sur les services de santé
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Aucune intervention: Usual Care
Patients will receive no additional ICD specific information other than what is offered by the clinic consistent with usual care.
The control group will be asked where they went for information in the follow-up interviews.
|
|
|
Expérimental: ICD Decision Aid Toolkit
In the intervention arm, research assistants will provide the patients with the toolkit of decision aids.
At that time, participants will have the option of using all of the decision aids or just some of the decision aids.
Participants who do not have access to the internet, will be offered a DVD (digital video disc) version of the video and they will be asked if they would like to arrange a visit where they can review the website with the research assistant.
|
Research assistants will provide patients with a toolkit of decision aids.
Participants will have the option of using all of the decision aids or just some of the decision aids.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Measure the acceptability and feasibility of the decision aids
Délai: pre-ICD discussion - baseline
|
Acceptability-measure decision aid acceptability using modified version of decision aid acceptability developed by Barry et al. Feasibility-explore participation rates and adherence to study protocol; weekly team meetings to discuss recruitment strategies Knowledge: 21 item knowledge measure developed in-house Decision Conflict: validated 15-item decision conflict measure developed by O'Connor et al. Decision Regret: validated 5-item decision regret scale Decision choice: ultimate choice patient made about getting an ICD Decision participation: Prior to intervention, we measure patients' preferred role in decision making using the control preferences scale. After the decision, we measure the participants' actual role in decision making. Anxiety and Depression: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Chart Review Outcome: For those that had not yet had a procedure, we will review the charts at the end of study to determine if they received an ICD or not. |
pre-ICD discussion - baseline
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Determine relative value of the four decision aids
Délai: 3 months after baseline interview
|
Determine the relative value of the various tools in the toolkit through in-depth interviews from study participants and providers at each intervention site. We will ask participants the following questions:
|
3 months after baseline interview
|
|
Measure the acceptability and feasibility of the decision aids
Délai: within 4 weeks of meeting with electrophysiologist
|
Acceptability-measure decision aid acceptability using modified version of decision aid acceptability developed by Barry et al. Feasibility-explore participation rates and adherence to study protocol; weekly team meetings to discuss recruitment strategies Knowledge: 21 item knowledge measure developed in-house Decision Conflict: validated 15-item decision conflict measure developed by O'Connor et al. Decision Regret: validated 5-item decision regret scale Decision choice: ultimate choice patient made about getting an ICD Decision participation: Prior to intervention, we measure patients' preferred role in decision making using the control preferences scale. After the decision, we measure the participants' actual role in decision making. Anxiety and Depression: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Chart Review Outcome: For those that had not yet had a procedure, we will review the charts at the end of study to determine if they received an ICD or not. |
within 4 weeks of meeting with electrophysiologist
|
|
Measure the acceptability and feasibility of the decision aids
Délai: 3 months after baseline interview
|
Acceptability-measure decision aid acceptability using modified version of decision aid acceptability developed by Barry et al. Feasibility-explore participation rates and adherence to study protocol; weekly team meetings to discuss recruitment strategies Knowledge: 21 item knowledge measure developed in-house Decision Conflict: validated 15-item decision conflict measure developed by O'Connor et al. Decision Regret: validated 5-item decision regret scale Decision choice: ultimate choice patient made about getting an ICD Decision participation: Prior to intervention, we measure patients' preferred role in decision making using the control preferences scale. After the decision, we measure the participants' actual role in decision making. Anxiety and Depression: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Chart Review Outcome: For those that had not yet had a procedure, we will review the charts at the end of study to determine if they received an ICD or not. |
3 months after baseline interview
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Daniel D Matlock, MD, MPH, University of Colorado, Denver
Publications et liens utiles
Publications générales
- Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, Wilber DJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Brown MW, Andrews ML; Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II Investigators. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 21;346(12):877-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013474. Epub 2002 Mar 19.
- Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, Poole JE, Packer DL, Boineau R, Domanski M, Troutman C, Anderson J, Johnson G, McNulty SE, Clapp-Channing N, Davidson-Ray LD, Fraulo ES, Fishbein DP, Luceri RM, Ip JH; Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) Investigators. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 20;352(3):225-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043399. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2005 May 19;352(20):2146.
- Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, Krueger S, Kass DA, De Marco T, Carson P, DiCarlo L, DeMets D, White BG, DeVries DW, Feldman AM; Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Heart Failure (COMPANION) Investigators. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2140-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032423.
- O'Connor AM, Wennberg JE, Legare F, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Moulton BW, Sepucha KR, Sodano AG, King JS. Toward the 'tipping point': decision aids and informed patient choice. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 May-Jun;26(3):716-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.716.
- Kadish A, Dyer A, Daubert JP, Quigg R, Estes NA, Anderson KP, Calkins H, Hoch D, Goldberger J, Shalaby A, Sanders WE, Schaechter A, Levine JH; Defibrillators in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE) Investigators. Prophylactic defibrillator implantation in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2151-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa033088.
- O'Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, Barry M, Col NF, Eden KB, Entwistle VA, Fiset V, Holmes-Rovner M, Khangura S, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Rovner D. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2.
- Volandes AE, Paasche-Orlow MK, Barry MJ, Gillick MR, Minaker KL, Chang Y, Cook EF, Abbo ED, El-Jawahri A, Mitchell SL. Video decision support tool for advance care planning in dementia: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009 May 28;338:b2159. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2159.
- Col NF, Ngo L, Fortin JM, Goldberg RJ, O'Connor AM. Can computerized decision support help patients make complex treatment decisions? A randomized controlled trial of an individualized menopause decision aid. Med Decis Making. 2007 Sep-Oct;27(5):585-98. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07306781. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
- Jibaja-Weiss ML, Volk RJ, Granchi TS, Neff NE, Robinson EK, Spann SJ, Aoki N, Friedman LC, Beck JR. Entertainment education for breast cancer surgery decisions: a randomized trial among patients with low health literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Jul;84(1):41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
- Stevenson LW, Desai AS. Selecting patients for discussion of the ICD as primary prevention for sudden death in heart failure. J Card Fail. 2006 Aug;12(6):407-12. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2006.06.001.
- Goldenberg I, Moss AJ, Hall WJ, McNitt S, Zareba W, Andrews ML, Cannom DS; Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II Investigators. Causes and consequences of heart failure after prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial II. Circulation. 2006 Jun 20;113(24):2810-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.577262. Epub 2006 Jun 12.
- Noyes K, Corona E, Zwanziger J, Hall WJ, Zhao H, Wang H, Moss AJ, Dick AW; Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II. Health-related quality of life consequences of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: results from MADIT II. Med Care. 2007 May;45(5):377-85. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000257142.12600.c1.
- Mark DB, Anstrom KJ, Sun JL, Clapp-Channing NE, Tsiatis AA, Davidson-Ray L, Lee KL, Bardy GH; Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial Investigators. Quality of life with defibrillator therapy or amiodarone in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 4;359(10):999-1008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706719.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Estimation)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 13-3152
- 121483 (Autre subvention/numéro de financement: Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI))
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .