Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

A Pilot Trial of Patient Decision Aids for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICDs)

29. oktober 2019 oppdatert av: University of Colorado, Denver
The purpose of this study is to test the acceptability and feasibility of a "toolkit" of patient decision aids (PtDAs) for heart failure patients who are considering an ICD implant.

Studieoversikt

Detaljert beskrivelse

Specific Aim 1: Examine acceptability and feasibility of a toolkit of patient decision aids (PtDAs) for patients with heart failure referred for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using a randomized control trial design across three diverse health care systems (Kaiser Colorado, The University of Colorado, and The Denver Veterans Hospital).

  1. Measure the acceptability of the decision aids
  2. Explore feasibility by measuring patient participation rates and adherence to the study protocol across all three sites.
  3. Conduct a preliminary assessment of outcomes by measuring changes in decision quality (knowledge and value concordance), quality of life, depressive symptoms, health status, and spiritual well-being.

Specific Aim 2: Determine the relative value of the various tools in the toolkit through in-depth interviews from study participants and providers at each intervention site

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

15

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, Forente stater, 80045
        • University of Colorado Hospital (UCH)
      • Denver, Colorado, Forente stater, 80220
        • Denver VA Medical Center
      • Denver, Colorado, Forente stater, 80218
        • Kaiser Permanente of Colorado

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

18 år og eldre (Voksen, Eldre voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • systolic heart failure (defined as an ejection fraction less than 35%)
  • have been referred for a primary prevention ICD
  • Note: Patients referred for an ICD with cardiac resynchronization therapy are NOT excluded.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Already have an ICD
  • Non-English speaking (as the tools we have developed are only available in English currently)
  • Other ICD indications (e.g. secondary prevention, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy)
  • Cognitive Impairment defined only as people with an inability to consent

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Helsetjenesteforskning
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Ingen inngripen: Usual Care
Patients will receive no additional ICD specific information other than what is offered by the clinic consistent with usual care. The control group will be asked where they went for information in the follow-up interviews.
Eksperimentell: ICD Decision Aid Toolkit
In the intervention arm, research assistants will provide the patients with the toolkit of decision aids. At that time, participants will have the option of using all of the decision aids or just some of the decision aids. Participants who do not have access to the internet, will be offered a DVD (digital video disc) version of the video and they will be asked if they would like to arrange a visit where they can review the website with the research assistant.
Research assistants will provide patients with a toolkit of decision aids. Participants will have the option of using all of the decision aids or just some of the decision aids.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Measure the acceptability and feasibility of the decision aids
Tidsramme: pre-ICD discussion - baseline

Acceptability-measure decision aid acceptability using modified version of decision aid acceptability developed by Barry et al.

Feasibility-explore participation rates and adherence to study protocol; weekly team meetings to discuss recruitment strategies Knowledge: 21 item knowledge measure developed in-house Decision Conflict: validated 15-item decision conflict measure developed by O'Connor et al.

Decision Regret: validated 5-item decision regret scale Decision choice: ultimate choice patient made about getting an ICD Decision participation: Prior to intervention, we measure patients' preferred role in decision making using the control preferences scale. After the decision, we measure the participants' actual role in decision making.

Anxiety and Depression: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Chart Review Outcome: For those that had not yet had a procedure, we will review the charts at the end of study to determine if they received an ICD or not.

pre-ICD discussion - baseline

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Determine relative value of the four decision aids
Tidsramme: 3 months after baseline interview

Determine the relative value of the various tools in the toolkit through in-depth interviews from study participants and providers at each intervention site.

We will ask participants the following questions:

  • Have you made a decision about getting or not getting the ICD?
  • What information did you use to make your decision?
  • How are you feeling about your decision?
  • What else would have been helpful in making your decision?
  • (Intervention only) Did you use any of the decision aids you were given?
  • If yes, please tell us how you used them? Did the decision aids make you feel better or worse about your decision? Did you like one of them better than the others? Is there any aspect that wasn't helpful?
  • If no, please tell us why not? What would have been helpful?
  • Do you have any advice on the best way to deliver these decision aids to future patients?
3 months after baseline interview
Measure the acceptability and feasibility of the decision aids
Tidsramme: within 4 weeks of meeting with electrophysiologist

Acceptability-measure decision aid acceptability using modified version of decision aid acceptability developed by Barry et al.

Feasibility-explore participation rates and adherence to study protocol; weekly team meetings to discuss recruitment strategies Knowledge: 21 item knowledge measure developed in-house Decision Conflict: validated 15-item decision conflict measure developed by O'Connor et al.

Decision Regret: validated 5-item decision regret scale Decision choice: ultimate choice patient made about getting an ICD Decision participation: Prior to intervention, we measure patients' preferred role in decision making using the control preferences scale. After the decision, we measure the participants' actual role in decision making.

Anxiety and Depression: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Chart Review Outcome: For those that had not yet had a procedure, we will review the charts at the end of study to determine if they received an ICD or not.

within 4 weeks of meeting with electrophysiologist
Measure the acceptability and feasibility of the decision aids
Tidsramme: 3 months after baseline interview

Acceptability-measure decision aid acceptability using modified version of decision aid acceptability developed by Barry et al.

Feasibility-explore participation rates and adherence to study protocol; weekly team meetings to discuss recruitment strategies Knowledge: 21 item knowledge measure developed in-house Decision Conflict: validated 15-item decision conflict measure developed by O'Connor et al.

Decision Regret: validated 5-item decision regret scale Decision choice: ultimate choice patient made about getting an ICD Decision participation: Prior to intervention, we measure patients' preferred role in decision making using the control preferences scale. After the decision, we measure the participants' actual role in decision making.

Anxiety and Depression: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Chart Review Outcome: For those that had not yet had a procedure, we will review the charts at the end of study to determine if they received an ICD or not.

3 months after baseline interview

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Daniel D Matlock, MD, MPH, University of Colorado, Denver

Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker

Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.

Generelle publikasjoner

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart

1. september 2014

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

1. august 2016

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

1. november 2016

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

12. desember 2013

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

30. desember 2013

Først lagt ut (Anslag)

1. januar 2014

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

31. oktober 2019

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

29. oktober 2019

Sist bekreftet

1. oktober 2019

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere