Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

The Impact of Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine Use At Scale on Newborn Outcomes in Nigeria (MIPP-NG)

28 avril 2016 mis à jour par: Nosa Orobaton, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc.

Scaling up the Use of Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine for the Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy: Results and Lessons on Scalability, Costs and Program From Three Local Government Areas in Sokoto State, Nigeria

The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of the scale-up of sulphadoxine- pyrimethamine (SP) for the preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy in three Local Government Areas (LGAs) in Sokoto State, Nigeria. The scale-up strategy tested included the introduction of community-based distribution of SP in addition to ongoing health facility distribution during antenatal care (ANC) visits. In addition, the study examined for the effect of SP use by participants during pregnancy on the head circumference of live newborns and on the odds of a baby being a stillborn. Finally, the investigators also sought to quantify the costs associated with program scale up SP to deliver at least three doses of SP per participant via a government operated distribution program.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Description détaillée

Study Objectives

The study objectives were to:

  1. Examine scale-up mechanisms that enable increased SP coverage through community-based primary health care delivery, without reducing facility uptake of SP.
  2. Examine community acceptance of SP and the likelihood of long-term community-sustained demand.
  3. Document associations, if any, between increased SP coverage and improved intrauterine conditions for newborn, as measured by head circumference increments and declines in still birth rates.
  4. Estimate the costs of delivering SP at scale per woman for a three doses or higher regimen.

Study Location and Relevant Contextual Information

The study was undertaken in four LGAs: Dange Shuni Goronyo and Silame (combined 2015 population, according to official Sokoto State estimates = 661,606) LGAs which were purposively selected as intervention LGAs; and Yabo LGA, the fourth (2015 population, according to official Sokoto State estimates = 167,971), was purposively selected as the counterfactual LGA. The selection criteria were that all LGAs had a high prevalence of malaria in pregnancy and that at one LGA each in the intervention group, was selected from each of the State's three senatorial zones.

Sampling Size Considerations

Given the intention of the study to examine the prospects of scaling up an already existing program, to reach all eligible pregnant participants, no sampling regimen was included in this study.

Data Collection Procedures

The community-based health volunteer (CBHV) system has an inbuilt data collection system managed by a community drug keeper (CDK) and a supervising facility-based health worker to monitor distribution at the community level. Investigators used an outcome form to collect data. Data captured in the outcome form included the condition of the newborn and mother at birth, of the newborn at birth-live birth or stillbirth-at days 7, 14 and 28 postpartum. For this study, the investigators modified the outcome form to also capture the number of SP doses a participant received and date/month the participant got them. The modified outcome form also collected data on a pregnant participant's primipara status, ANC status, gestation in months at time of delivery, the state of newborns (live or stillborn), sex of the newborn and head circumference measurements.

Nominal cost and expense data in 2015 Nigerian Naira (NGN) directly related to community and facility distribution of SP in the intervention and counterfactual LGAs were obtained from project records and other sources. The cost estimates obtained are what it would cost the state government and LGAs as de facto providers of primary health care in Nigeria, to deliver SP-related services at both the community and facility level, including start-up costs. Six cost centers were included in the analyses: health facility, LGA technical administration, CBHV supervisors, ward development committees, CBHV, and logistics for SP distribution.

Data Quality Procedures

Twelve teams of four data quality auditors, independent of other project staff, were recruited to track data quality obtained from communities. Each team comprised of three females and one supervisor. Over the life of the project, the teams visited all the participants recorded with at least one birth-that occurred during the project-in the 42 wards of the three intervention and one counterfactual LGAs. The data auditors also sought for and compiled information on omitted mothers and births. The auditors were expected to directly inquire of a participant-or an informed family member - in the event of a maternal death-if a CBHV and CBHV Supervisor visited, the status of newborns, alive or stillborn, and if head circumference was measured within seven days among live births. With participants' responses as the gold standard, births, status of births, and confirmed head circumference measurements were verified.

Statistical Analyses

Programmatic data was used to assess the coverage of SP doses during pregnancy in the intervention and counterfactual LGA's. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used by investigators to test associations between doses of SP and newborn head circumference and the odds of stillbirth. These analyses were conducted in Statistical Analysis System (SAS) v.9 and excel.

For cost data, the investigators calculated two ratios: cost per dose and cost per woman served, disaggregated by number of SP doses in the intervention and and counterfactual group. Analyses were conducted in Excel®.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

31493

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant
  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Femelle

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants must be pregnant.
  2. Pregnant participants must have experienced quickening in course of gestation.
  3. Participants must reside in an intervention or a counterfactual LGA.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-pregnant residents in a counterfactual or an intervention LGA.
  2. Non-residents of counterfactual or intervention LGA.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Recherche sur les services de santé
  • Répartition: N / A
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Community distribution of SP
All the eligible pregnant women were reached with SP either at health clinic and/or at community/household level with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP). Alerts and reminders were sent to them by community-based health volunteers ahead of subsequent SP doses.
SP delivered at both the community and facility level by trained CBHVs in three LGAs.
Autres noms:
  • Community Distribution of SP to eligible participants

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Percentage of participants that got SP coverage among all pregnant women
Délai: Up to 7 months
The percentage SP coverage among all pregnant participants and by number of SP doses ingested. The outcome form will be used to obtain an aggregate number of women that received SP. The total number of eligible women will be obtained from either an enumeration of eligible women in the intervention LGA, or by population estimation in the counterfactual LGA.
Up to 7 months

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Cost per Woman served with SP in Nigeria Naira
Délai: Up to 7 months
This will be obtained from costing data produced by the study and the total number of participants served as derived from the outcome forms.
Up to 7 months
Cost per SP dose delivered in Nigeria Naira
Délai: Up to 12 months
This will be obtained from costing data produced by the study and the total number of SP doses given as derived from the outcome forms.
Up to 12 months
Incidence of Stillbirths in stillbirths per 1000 term births
Délai: Up to 7 months
Stillbirth is a delivery that occurred after 7 months of gestation in which a baby was birthed without any signs of life (no breathing, no movement, and no sound) as reported by a participant or an informed family member.
Up to 7 months
Head circumference of Newborn in millimeters
Délai: Up to 7 months
Head circumference of live newborns was measured within 7 days postpartum by CBHV. The information will be aggregated from individual outcome forms.
Up to 7 months

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Nosa G Orobaton, MD, DrPH, John Snow, Inc.

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 avril 2015

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 novembre 2015

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 novembre 2015

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

26 avril 2016

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

28 avril 2016

Première publication (Estimation)

2 mai 2016

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

2 mai 2016

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

28 avril 2016

Dernière vérification

1 avril 2016

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

INDÉCIS

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner