Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

The Impact of Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine Use At Scale on Newborn Outcomes in Nigeria (MIPP-NG)

28 kwietnia 2016 zaktualizowane przez: Nosa Orobaton, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc.

Scaling up the Use of Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine for the Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy: Results and Lessons on Scalability, Costs and Program From Three Local Government Areas in Sokoto State, Nigeria

The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of the scale-up of sulphadoxine- pyrimethamine (SP) for the preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy in three Local Government Areas (LGAs) in Sokoto State, Nigeria. The scale-up strategy tested included the introduction of community-based distribution of SP in addition to ongoing health facility distribution during antenatal care (ANC) visits. In addition, the study examined for the effect of SP use by participants during pregnancy on the head circumference of live newborns and on the odds of a baby being a stillborn. Finally, the investigators also sought to quantify the costs associated with program scale up SP to deliver at least three doses of SP per participant via a government operated distribution program.

Przegląd badań

Status

Zakończony

Szczegółowy opis

Study Objectives

The study objectives were to:

  1. Examine scale-up mechanisms that enable increased SP coverage through community-based primary health care delivery, without reducing facility uptake of SP.
  2. Examine community acceptance of SP and the likelihood of long-term community-sustained demand.
  3. Document associations, if any, between increased SP coverage and improved intrauterine conditions for newborn, as measured by head circumference increments and declines in still birth rates.
  4. Estimate the costs of delivering SP at scale per woman for a three doses or higher regimen.

Study Location and Relevant Contextual Information

The study was undertaken in four LGAs: Dange Shuni Goronyo and Silame (combined 2015 population, according to official Sokoto State estimates = 661,606) LGAs which were purposively selected as intervention LGAs; and Yabo LGA, the fourth (2015 population, according to official Sokoto State estimates = 167,971), was purposively selected as the counterfactual LGA. The selection criteria were that all LGAs had a high prevalence of malaria in pregnancy and that at one LGA each in the intervention group, was selected from each of the State's three senatorial zones.

Sampling Size Considerations

Given the intention of the study to examine the prospects of scaling up an already existing program, to reach all eligible pregnant participants, no sampling regimen was included in this study.

Data Collection Procedures

The community-based health volunteer (CBHV) system has an inbuilt data collection system managed by a community drug keeper (CDK) and a supervising facility-based health worker to monitor distribution at the community level. Investigators used an outcome form to collect data. Data captured in the outcome form included the condition of the newborn and mother at birth, of the newborn at birth-live birth or stillbirth-at days 7, 14 and 28 postpartum. For this study, the investigators modified the outcome form to also capture the number of SP doses a participant received and date/month the participant got them. The modified outcome form also collected data on a pregnant participant's primipara status, ANC status, gestation in months at time of delivery, the state of newborns (live or stillborn), sex of the newborn and head circumference measurements.

Nominal cost and expense data in 2015 Nigerian Naira (NGN) directly related to community and facility distribution of SP in the intervention and counterfactual LGAs were obtained from project records and other sources. The cost estimates obtained are what it would cost the state government and LGAs as de facto providers of primary health care in Nigeria, to deliver SP-related services at both the community and facility level, including start-up costs. Six cost centers were included in the analyses: health facility, LGA technical administration, CBHV supervisors, ward development committees, CBHV, and logistics for SP distribution.

Data Quality Procedures

Twelve teams of four data quality auditors, independent of other project staff, were recruited to track data quality obtained from communities. Each team comprised of three females and one supervisor. Over the life of the project, the teams visited all the participants recorded with at least one birth-that occurred during the project-in the 42 wards of the three intervention and one counterfactual LGAs. The data auditors also sought for and compiled information on omitted mothers and births. The auditors were expected to directly inquire of a participant-or an informed family member - in the event of a maternal death-if a CBHV and CBHV Supervisor visited, the status of newborns, alive or stillborn, and if head circumference was measured within seven days among live births. With participants' responses as the gold standard, births, status of births, and confirmed head circumference measurements were verified.

Statistical Analyses

Programmatic data was used to assess the coverage of SP doses during pregnancy in the intervention and counterfactual LGA's. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used by investigators to test associations between doses of SP and newborn head circumference and the odds of stillbirth. These analyses were conducted in Statistical Analysis System (SAS) v.9 and excel.

For cost data, the investigators calculated two ratios: cost per dose and cost per woman served, disaggregated by number of SP doses in the intervention and and counterfactual group. Analyses were conducted in Excel®.

Typ studiów

Interwencyjne

Zapisy (Rzeczywisty)

31493

Faza

  • Nie dotyczy

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

  • Dziecko
  • Dorosły
  • Starszy dorosły

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Tak

Płeć kwalifikująca się do nauki

Kobieta

Opis

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants must be pregnant.
  2. Pregnant participants must have experienced quickening in course of gestation.
  3. Participants must reside in an intervention or a counterfactual LGA.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-pregnant residents in a counterfactual or an intervention LGA.
  2. Non-residents of counterfactual or intervention LGA.

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

  • Główny cel: Badania usług zdrowotnych
  • Przydział: Nie dotyczy
  • Model interwencyjny: Zadanie dla jednej grupy
  • Maskowanie: Brak (otwarta etykieta)

Broń i interwencje

Grupa uczestników / Arm
Interwencja / Leczenie
Eksperymentalny: Community distribution of SP
All the eligible pregnant women were reached with SP either at health clinic and/or at community/household level with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP). Alerts and reminders were sent to them by community-based health volunteers ahead of subsequent SP doses.
SP delivered at both the community and facility level by trained CBHVs in three LGAs.
Inne nazwy:
  • Community Distribution of SP to eligible participants

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Percentage of participants that got SP coverage among all pregnant women
Ramy czasowe: Up to 7 months
The percentage SP coverage among all pregnant participants and by number of SP doses ingested. The outcome form will be used to obtain an aggregate number of women that received SP. The total number of eligible women will be obtained from either an enumeration of eligible women in the intervention LGA, or by population estimation in the counterfactual LGA.
Up to 7 months

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Cost per Woman served with SP in Nigeria Naira
Ramy czasowe: Up to 7 months
This will be obtained from costing data produced by the study and the total number of participants served as derived from the outcome forms.
Up to 7 months
Cost per SP dose delivered in Nigeria Naira
Ramy czasowe: Up to 12 months
This will be obtained from costing data produced by the study and the total number of SP doses given as derived from the outcome forms.
Up to 12 months
Incidence of Stillbirths in stillbirths per 1000 term births
Ramy czasowe: Up to 7 months
Stillbirth is a delivery that occurred after 7 months of gestation in which a baby was birthed without any signs of life (no breathing, no movement, and no sound) as reported by a participant or an informed family member.
Up to 7 months
Head circumference of Newborn in millimeters
Ramy czasowe: Up to 7 months
Head circumference of live newborns was measured within 7 days postpartum by CBHV. The information will be aggregated from individual outcome forms.
Up to 7 months

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Śledczy

  • Główny śledczy: Nosa G Orobaton, MD, DrPH, John Snow, Inc.

Publikacje i pomocne linki

Osoba odpowiedzialna za wprowadzenie informacji o badaniu dobrowolnie udostępnia te publikacje. Mogą one dotyczyć wszystkiego, co jest związane z badaniem.

Publikacje ogólne

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów

1 kwietnia 2015

Zakończenie podstawowe (Rzeczywisty)

1 listopada 2015

Ukończenie studiów (Rzeczywisty)

1 listopada 2015

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

26 kwietnia 2016

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

28 kwietnia 2016

Pierwszy wysłany (Oszacować)

2 maja 2016

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Oszacować)

2 maja 2016

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

28 kwietnia 2016

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 kwietnia 2016

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)

Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?

NIEZDECYDOWANY

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .

Subskrybuj