Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

The Impact of Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine Use At Scale on Newborn Outcomes in Nigeria (MIPP-NG)

28 de abril de 2016 actualizado por: Nosa Orobaton, JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc.

Scaling up the Use of Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine for the Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Pregnancy: Results and Lessons on Scalability, Costs and Program From Three Local Government Areas in Sokoto State, Nigeria

The purpose of this study is to test the feasibility of the scale-up of sulphadoxine- pyrimethamine (SP) for the preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy in three Local Government Areas (LGAs) in Sokoto State, Nigeria. The scale-up strategy tested included the introduction of community-based distribution of SP in addition to ongoing health facility distribution during antenatal care (ANC) visits. In addition, the study examined for the effect of SP use by participants during pregnancy on the head circumference of live newborns and on the odds of a baby being a stillborn. Finally, the investigators also sought to quantify the costs associated with program scale up SP to deliver at least three doses of SP per participant via a government operated distribution program.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Study Objectives

The study objectives were to:

  1. Examine scale-up mechanisms that enable increased SP coverage through community-based primary health care delivery, without reducing facility uptake of SP.
  2. Examine community acceptance of SP and the likelihood of long-term community-sustained demand.
  3. Document associations, if any, between increased SP coverage and improved intrauterine conditions for newborn, as measured by head circumference increments and declines in still birth rates.
  4. Estimate the costs of delivering SP at scale per woman for a three doses or higher regimen.

Study Location and Relevant Contextual Information

The study was undertaken in four LGAs: Dange Shuni Goronyo and Silame (combined 2015 population, according to official Sokoto State estimates = 661,606) LGAs which were purposively selected as intervention LGAs; and Yabo LGA, the fourth (2015 population, according to official Sokoto State estimates = 167,971), was purposively selected as the counterfactual LGA. The selection criteria were that all LGAs had a high prevalence of malaria in pregnancy and that at one LGA each in the intervention group, was selected from each of the State's three senatorial zones.

Sampling Size Considerations

Given the intention of the study to examine the prospects of scaling up an already existing program, to reach all eligible pregnant participants, no sampling regimen was included in this study.

Data Collection Procedures

The community-based health volunteer (CBHV) system has an inbuilt data collection system managed by a community drug keeper (CDK) and a supervising facility-based health worker to monitor distribution at the community level. Investigators used an outcome form to collect data. Data captured in the outcome form included the condition of the newborn and mother at birth, of the newborn at birth-live birth or stillbirth-at days 7, 14 and 28 postpartum. For this study, the investigators modified the outcome form to also capture the number of SP doses a participant received and date/month the participant got them. The modified outcome form also collected data on a pregnant participant's primipara status, ANC status, gestation in months at time of delivery, the state of newborns (live or stillborn), sex of the newborn and head circumference measurements.

Nominal cost and expense data in 2015 Nigerian Naira (NGN) directly related to community and facility distribution of SP in the intervention and counterfactual LGAs were obtained from project records and other sources. The cost estimates obtained are what it would cost the state government and LGAs as de facto providers of primary health care in Nigeria, to deliver SP-related services at both the community and facility level, including start-up costs. Six cost centers were included in the analyses: health facility, LGA technical administration, CBHV supervisors, ward development committees, CBHV, and logistics for SP distribution.

Data Quality Procedures

Twelve teams of four data quality auditors, independent of other project staff, were recruited to track data quality obtained from communities. Each team comprised of three females and one supervisor. Over the life of the project, the teams visited all the participants recorded with at least one birth-that occurred during the project-in the 42 wards of the three intervention and one counterfactual LGAs. The data auditors also sought for and compiled information on omitted mothers and births. The auditors were expected to directly inquire of a participant-or an informed family member - in the event of a maternal death-if a CBHV and CBHV Supervisor visited, the status of newborns, alive or stillborn, and if head circumference was measured within seven days among live births. With participants' responses as the gold standard, births, status of births, and confirmed head circumference measurements were verified.

Statistical Analyses

Programmatic data was used to assess the coverage of SP doses during pregnancy in the intervention and counterfactual LGA's. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used by investigators to test associations between doses of SP and newborn head circumference and the odds of stillbirth. These analyses were conducted in Statistical Analysis System (SAS) v.9 and excel.

For cost data, the investigators calculated two ratios: cost per dose and cost per woman served, disaggregated by number of SP doses in the intervention and and counterfactual group. Analyses were conducted in Excel®.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

31493

Fase

  • No aplica

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Femenino

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants must be pregnant.
  2. Pregnant participants must have experienced quickening in course of gestation.
  3. Participants must reside in an intervention or a counterfactual LGA.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-pregnant residents in a counterfactual or an intervention LGA.
  2. Non-residents of counterfactual or intervention LGA.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Community distribution of SP
All the eligible pregnant women were reached with SP either at health clinic and/or at community/household level with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP). Alerts and reminders were sent to them by community-based health volunteers ahead of subsequent SP doses.
SP delivered at both the community and facility level by trained CBHVs in three LGAs.
Otros nombres:
  • Community Distribution of SP to eligible participants

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Percentage of participants that got SP coverage among all pregnant women
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 7 months
The percentage SP coverage among all pregnant participants and by number of SP doses ingested. The outcome form will be used to obtain an aggregate number of women that received SP. The total number of eligible women will be obtained from either an enumeration of eligible women in the intervention LGA, or by population estimation in the counterfactual LGA.
Up to 7 months

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Cost per Woman served with SP in Nigeria Naira
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 7 months
This will be obtained from costing data produced by the study and the total number of participants served as derived from the outcome forms.
Up to 7 months
Cost per SP dose delivered in Nigeria Naira
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 12 months
This will be obtained from costing data produced by the study and the total number of SP doses given as derived from the outcome forms.
Up to 12 months
Incidence of Stillbirths in stillbirths per 1000 term births
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 7 months
Stillbirth is a delivery that occurred after 7 months of gestation in which a baby was birthed without any signs of life (no breathing, no movement, and no sound) as reported by a participant or an informed family member.
Up to 7 months
Head circumference of Newborn in millimeters
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 7 months
Head circumference of live newborns was measured within 7 days postpartum by CBHV. The information will be aggregated from individual outcome forms.
Up to 7 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Nosa G Orobaton, MD, DrPH, John Snow, Inc.

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de abril de 2015

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de noviembre de 2015

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de noviembre de 2015

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

26 de abril de 2016

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

28 de abril de 2016

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

2 de mayo de 2016

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

2 de mayo de 2016

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

28 de abril de 2016

Última verificación

1 de abril de 2016

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

INDECISO

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir