Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Usability Testing of Affordable Haptic Robots for Stroke Therapy (Theradrive)

3 septembre 2020 mis à jour par: University of Pennsylvania
Stroke survivors with hemiplegia will be evaluated by rehabilitation professionals and asked to perform a battery of assessments to test the viability and usability of a force-feedback robot that adapts to each individual subject's performance. Subsequently, they will be asked to complete post-assessment questionnaires that provide feedback to the researchers on their observations and thoughts about the therapy devices.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Résilié

Description détaillée

TheraDrive is a low-cost robotic system for post-stroke upper extremity rehabilitation. The system uses off-the-shelf computer gaming wheels with force feedback to help reduce motor impairment and improve function in the arms of stroke survivors. Preliminary results from various studies have shown that the original TheraDrive system lacked a robust mechanical linkage which could withstand the forces exerted by patients, lacked a patient-specific adaptive controller to deliver personalized therapy, and was not capable of delivering effective therapy to severely low-functioning patients. A new low-cost, high-force haptic robot with a single degree of freedom has been developed to address these concerns. This study has two purposes: first, to test the viability and usability of the new robot system alongside the original TheraDrive system; and second, to test if low-functioning patients benefit, and if so how much, from using force-feedback therapy as opposed to devices with zero impedance. This will be done by recruiting approximately 36 human subjects. Exercises will be performed by study subjects and an adaptive controller will monitor patient performance to ensure that exercises are difficult but doable, which is important for maintaining patient motivation. It is hypothesized that not only will the new system be viable, but that it will provide better robot-assisted therapy to a large variety of patients, especially low-functioning stroke survivors with hemiplegia.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

23

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, États-Unis, 19146
        • Penn Medicine Rittenhouse

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stroke survivors at least 18 years of age with hemiplegia.
  • The subject's stroke must have occurred at least 3 months prior to enrollment in the study.
  • Low and Moderate functioning stroke survivors as measured by Fugl- Meyer
  • Not depressed
  • No more than Mild Cognitive Deficit
  • Participants must be able to sit upright for 4 hours at a time in Part A of the study; and 2 hours at a time, 3 days a week, for Part B of the study.
  • The subject's stroke must have occurred at least 3 months prior to enrollment in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Greater than mild cognitive deficits
  • Greater than mild depression. A member of the research team will administer Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) to each study participant over the phone. If the participant is found to have greater than mild depression, as measured by the BDI, they will not qualify for the study.
  • Receiving rehabilitation on the upper limb.
  • Received Botox injections within the past 3 months.
  • Suffering from contractures (chronic loss of joint motion) or debilitating spasticity in the upper extremity.
  • Experiencing greater than mild pain, and/or the PI determines that the participant should no longer continue working with the novel therapy devices, the study will be stopped.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: N / A
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Autre: Stroke survivors with low and moderate motor deficits
Subjects with low and moderate motor deficits will 1) complete exercises with 2 commercial (joystick and wheel) and the Theradrive haptic robot after pre assessment 2) then experience 12 therapy sessions on the Theradrive haptic robot with Adaptive Feedback. 3) Assessments pre and post therapy.
Commercial Joystick and Wheels Plus the Haptic TheraDrive Robot will be used. Haptic Theradrive is a low-cost robotic system for post-stroke upper extremity rehabilitation. The system uses off-the-shelf computer gaming wheels with force feedback to help reduce motor impairment and improve function in the arms of stroke survivors.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Fugl Meyer
Délai: At 0 weeks
The primary outcomes are motor control for the upper limb: Subjects completed tasks on scale; Motor scale maximum is 66. minimum is 0. Lower is more impaired. Higher is less impaired.
At 0 weeks
Box and Blocks
Délai: At Session 0. Pre-intervention
Measures ADL Function. Completed reach and grasp activities. Reached for 1 inch cube and placed with impaired arm. More blocks indicate higher function. Less blocks lower function
At Session 0. Pre-intervention
Tracking Accuracy
Délai: At Session 0
Tracking accuracy is measured using the normalized root mean square, which is a measure for error in tracking performance with respect to a desired goal. Root mean squared divided by the maximum error if person does not move. The higher the decimal the higher the error made. Lower is better performance.
At Session 0

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Grip Strength
Délai: pre-intervention
Grip strength as measured by a dynamometer. Subjects were asked to squeeze a dynamometer with impaired arm. Higher forces mean better function
pre-intervention
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)
Délai: pre-intervention
A brief 30-question test that takes around 10 to 12 minutes to complete and helps assess people for impairment in cognition domains. Maximum is 30. Minimum is 0; Low is <17 is severe cognitive impairment; a score 26 and higher is normal cognition.
pre-intervention
Becks Depression Scale
Délai: Pre-intervention
Measures depression. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a 21-item, self-report rating inventory that measures characteristic attitudes and symptoms of depression (Beck, et al., 1961). Maximum is 63 Total Score_______________Levels of Depression 1-10____________________These ups and downs are considered normal 11-16___________________ Mild mood disturbance 17-20___________________Borderline clinical depression 21-30___________________Moderate depression 31-40___________________Severe depression over 40__________________Extreme depression
Pre-intervention

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Michelle J Johnson, PhD, Penn Medicine Rittenhouse

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 mars 2014

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 juillet 2017

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 juillet 2017

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

29 mars 2016

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

11 mai 2016

Première publication (Estimation)

16 mai 2016

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

4 septembre 2020

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

3 septembre 2020

Dernière vérification

1 septembre 2020

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner