Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Can rTMS Enhance Somatosensory Recovery After Stroke?

4 avril 2022 mis à jour par: VA Office of Research and Development
Stroke affects over 795,000 Americans every year and has an enormous impact on the well-being of American Veterans with 6,000 new stroke admissions every year. Many of these stroke survivors are living with disabilities that limit their everyday function. One of the major consequences of stroke is loss of sensation which manifests as inability to perceive touch, temperature, pain or limb movement. Lack of sensation hinders full functional recovery. Current treatments for sensory loss produce only limited improvements and do not achieve full recovery. Therefore, it is critical to develop new therapies to re-train sensory function. The investigators propose to evaluate a novel non-invasive brain stimulation treatment called repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS). The effects of this technique on motor deficits following stroke have been studied, however rTMS for the treatment of sensory loss has not been examined to date. The investigators' study will examine for the first time if rTMS of a sensory brain region can improve sensory function in chronic stroke survivors.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

Sensory deficits are present in the majority of stroke survivors. Inability to feel movement, touch or pain impairs the investigators' ability to interact with environment and diminished the quality of life. These sensory deficits significantly impair functional activity and slow down recovery during rehabilitation. Currently available sensory rehabilitation techniques can only partially restore sensory function. The main objective of this study is to test a novel approach to improve sensory function after stroke using non-invasive brain stimulation. This pilot study will measure an immediate effect of different repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) paradigms in a crossover single session design. The effect of intervention is measured with clinical measures of sensory and motor function and with neurophysiological assessment of sensory pathways. If the concept is demonstrated in this pilot study, then following the lead of other investigations of this type, this pilot will provide the foundation to test the efficacy of a long-term multi-session intervention of combined rTMS and peripherally directed therapy.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

20

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

  • États-Unis
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, États-Unis, 44106
        • Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medically stable at least 6 months after first ever stroke.
  • Sufficient endurance to participate in the study.
  • Cognition sufficiently intact to give valid informed consent to participate.
  • Age > 18years.
  • Ability to follow 2 stage commands.
  • Impaired but not absent ability to feel touch, vibration and movement of the affected arm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute or progressive cardiac, renal, respiratory, neurological disorders or malignancy.
  • Any psychiatric diagnosis or active psychological condition.
  • History of substance abuse within the last 6 months
  • More than one ischemic stroke or stroke affecting both sides.
  • Claustrophobia, or inability to operate the MRI patient call button.
  • Pregnancy or pregnancy planning during the study period.
  • Lower motor neuron damage or radiculopathy
  • Contraindications for rTMS according to the TMS-use guidelines (Rossi et al 2009).
  • Inability to understand English.
  • Significant neglect for those with left-sided deficits.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation croisée
  • Masquage: Double

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Autre: High frequency rTMS
Each subject is provided with three different brain stimulation interventions in a single arm, single session crossover design study. One of the sessions was 5 Hz rTMS
Autre: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

3 types of interventions on different sessions

  • session 1 - High frequency rTMS targeting contralesional sensory cortex
  • session 2 - Low frequency rTMS
  • session 3 - sham rTMS
Autre: peripheral sensory stimulation
peripheral sensory electrical stimulation and vibration of the stroke-affected hand administered concurrently with each rTMS
Autre: Low frequency rTMS
Each subject is provided with three different brain stimulation interventions in a single arm, single session crossover design study. One of the sessions was 1 Hz rTMS
Autre: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

3 types of interventions on different sessions

  • session 1 - High frequency rTMS targeting contralesional sensory cortex
  • session 2 - Low frequency rTMS
  • session 3 - sham rTMS
Autre: peripheral sensory stimulation
peripheral sensory electrical stimulation and vibration of the stroke-affected hand administered concurrently with each rTMS
Autre: Sham rTMS
Each subject is provided with three different brain stimulation interventions in a single arm, single session crossover design study. One of the sessions was sham rTMS
Autre: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

3 types of interventions on different sessions

  • session 1 - High frequency rTMS targeting contralesional sensory cortex
  • session 2 - Low frequency rTMS
  • session 3 - sham rTMS
Autre: peripheral sensory stimulation
peripheral sensory electrical stimulation and vibration of the stroke-affected hand administered concurrently with each rTMS

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change From Baseline in Two-point Discrimination
Délai: up to 1 hour after intervention

Baseline measure is collected immediately before the intervention. There are two data collections following each intervention, one datacollection is immediately after the intervention and the second one is at 1 hour after intervention.

Two-point discrimination was measured with Disk-Criminator disks (Baltimore, MD) by determining the subjects' ability to perceive two points on the disk as two separate points rather than as a single point. The distances between the two points ranged between 2 and 15 mm. One and two sensory points were presented in a pseudo-random order to subjects' 4th digit volar fingertip surface. A threshold is determined when seventy percent accuracy is exhibited for identifying the difference between single versus double point stimulation.
up to 1 hour after intervention
Change From Baseline in N20 Somatosensory Evoked Potential(SSEP) Peak Latency
Délai: up to 1 hour after intervention

Baseline measure is collected immediately before the intervention. Following each intervention, data is collected immediately after each intervention and at 1 hour after intervention.

SEPs were recorded with a Cadwell Sierra Wave (Cadwell, Kennewick, WA) (LSCDVAMC) or with Powerlab 4/25T (AD Instruments Inc. Colorado Springs, CO) and a Grass Stimulator (Natus Neurology, Middleton, WI) (CC)44. The recording electrodes (1 cm diameter, gold cup electrodes filled with conductive paste) were placed 2 cm posterior to C3 & C4 (10-20 international system of EEG electrode placement) and the reference electrode at Fz (Figure 1). Stimulus was applied to the median nerve at the wrist. Ground electrodes were placed at the lateral epicondyle of the stimulated arm. The evoked response from 500 stimuli were recorded and averaged for a single trial. Three SEP trials were recorded then analyzed. Latencies (in milliseconds) were determined for N20.
up to 1 hour after intervention

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

VA Office of Research and Development

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

12 avril 2012

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 juin 2019

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 avril 2022

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

21 juin 2016

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

21 juin 2016

Première publication (Estimation)

23 juin 2016

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

29 avril 2022

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

4 avril 2022

Dernière vérification

1 avril 2022

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • N1767-P
  • 12025-H13 (Autre identifiant: Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center IRB)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner