Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Can rTMS Enhance Somatosensory Recovery After Stroke?

4 april 2022 bijgewerkt door: VA Office of Research and Development
Stroke affects over 795,000 Americans every year and has an enormous impact on the well-being of American Veterans with 6,000 new stroke admissions every year. Many of these stroke survivors are living with disabilities that limit their everyday function. One of the major consequences of stroke is loss of sensation which manifests as inability to perceive touch, temperature, pain or limb movement. Lack of sensation hinders full functional recovery. Current treatments for sensory loss produce only limited improvements and do not achieve full recovery. Therefore, it is critical to develop new therapies to re-train sensory function. The investigators propose to evaluate a novel non-invasive brain stimulation treatment called repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS). The effects of this technique on motor deficits following stroke have been studied, however rTMS for the treatment of sensory loss has not been examined to date. The investigators' study will examine for the first time if rTMS of a sensory brain region can improve sensory function in chronic stroke survivors.

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Voltooid

Conditie

Interventie / Behandeling

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Sensory deficits are present in the majority of stroke survivors. Inability to feel movement, touch or pain impairs the investigators' ability to interact with environment and diminished the quality of life. These sensory deficits significantly impair functional activity and slow down recovery during rehabilitation. Currently available sensory rehabilitation techniques can only partially restore sensory function. The main objective of this study is to test a novel approach to improve sensory function after stroke using non-invasive brain stimulation. This pilot study will measure an immediate effect of different repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) paradigms in a crossover single session design. The effect of intervention is measured with clinical measures of sensory and motor function and with neurophysiological assessment of sensory pathways. If the concept is demonstrated in this pilot study, then following the lead of other investigations of this type, this pilot will provide the foundation to test the efficacy of a long-term multi-session intervention of combined rTMS and peripherally directed therapy.

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

20

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

  • Verenigde Staten
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, Verenigde Staten, 44106
        • Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

18 jaar en ouder (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medically stable at least 6 months after first ever stroke.
  • Sufficient endurance to participate in the study.
  • Cognition sufficiently intact to give valid informed consent to participate.
  • Age > 18years.
  • Ability to follow 2 stage commands.
  • Impaired but not absent ability to feel touch, vibration and movement of the affected arm.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute or progressive cardiac, renal, respiratory, neurological disorders or malignancy.
  • Any psychiatric diagnosis or active psychological condition.
  • History of substance abuse within the last 6 months
  • More than one ischemic stroke or stroke affecting both sides.
  • Claustrophobia, or inability to operate the MRI patient call button.
  • Pregnancy or pregnancy planning during the study period.
  • Lower motor neuron damage or radiculopathy
  • Contraindications for rTMS according to the TMS-use guidelines (Rossi et al 2009).
  • Inability to understand English.
  • Significant neglect for those with left-sided deficits.

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Behandeling
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Crossover-opdracht
  • Masker: Dubbele

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Ander: High frequency rTMS
Each subject is provided with three different brain stimulation interventions in a single arm, single session crossover design study. One of the sessions was 5 Hz rTMS
Ander: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

3 types of interventions on different sessions

  • session 1 - High frequency rTMS targeting contralesional sensory cortex
  • session 2 - Low frequency rTMS
  • session 3 - sham rTMS
Ander: peripheral sensory stimulation
peripheral sensory electrical stimulation and vibration of the stroke-affected hand administered concurrently with each rTMS
Ander: Low frequency rTMS
Each subject is provided with three different brain stimulation interventions in a single arm, single session crossover design study. One of the sessions was 1 Hz rTMS
Ander: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

3 types of interventions on different sessions

  • session 1 - High frequency rTMS targeting contralesional sensory cortex
  • session 2 - Low frequency rTMS
  • session 3 - sham rTMS
Ander: peripheral sensory stimulation
peripheral sensory electrical stimulation and vibration of the stroke-affected hand administered concurrently with each rTMS
Ander: Sham rTMS
Each subject is provided with three different brain stimulation interventions in a single arm, single session crossover design study. One of the sessions was sham rTMS
Ander: repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

3 types of interventions on different sessions

  • session 1 - High frequency rTMS targeting contralesional sensory cortex
  • session 2 - Low frequency rTMS
  • session 3 - sham rTMS
Ander: peripheral sensory stimulation
peripheral sensory electrical stimulation and vibration of the stroke-affected hand administered concurrently with each rTMS

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Change From Baseline in Two-point Discrimination
Tijdsspanne: up to 1 hour after intervention

Baseline measure is collected immediately before the intervention. There are two data collections following each intervention, one datacollection is immediately after the intervention and the second one is at 1 hour after intervention.

Two-point discrimination was measured with Disk-Criminator disks (Baltimore, MD) by determining the subjects' ability to perceive two points on the disk as two separate points rather than as a single point. The distances between the two points ranged between 2 and 15 mm. One and two sensory points were presented in a pseudo-random order to subjects' 4th digit volar fingertip surface. A threshold is determined when seventy percent accuracy is exhibited for identifying the difference between single versus double point stimulation.
up to 1 hour after intervention
Change From Baseline in N20 Somatosensory Evoked Potential(SSEP) Peak Latency
Tijdsspanne: up to 1 hour after intervention

Baseline measure is collected immediately before the intervention. Following each intervention, data is collected immediately after each intervention and at 1 hour after intervention.

SEPs were recorded with a Cadwell Sierra Wave (Cadwell, Kennewick, WA) (LSCDVAMC) or with Powerlab 4/25T (AD Instruments Inc. Colorado Springs, CO) and a Grass Stimulator (Natus Neurology, Middleton, WI) (CC)44. The recording electrodes (1 cm diameter, gold cup electrodes filled with conductive paste) were placed 2 cm posterior to C3 & C4 (10-20 international system of EEG electrode placement) and the reference electrode at Fz (Figure 1). Stimulus was applied to the median nerve at the wrist. Ground electrodes were placed at the lateral epicondyle of the stimulated arm. The evoked response from 500 stimuli were recorded and averaged for a single trial. Three SEP trials were recorded then analyzed. Latencies (in milliseconds) were determined for N20.
up to 1 hour after intervention

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development

Publicaties en nuttige links

De persoon die verantwoordelijk is voor het invoeren van informatie over het onderzoek stelt deze publicaties vrijwillig ter beschikking. Dit kan gaan over alles wat met het onderzoek te maken heeft.

Algemene publicaties

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

12 april 2012

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 juni 2019

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 april 2022

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

21 juni 2016

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

21 juni 2016

Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)

23 juni 2016

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

29 april 2022

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

4 april 2022

Laatst geverifieerd

1 april 2022

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Trefwoorden

Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • N1767-P
  • 12025-H13 (Andere identificatie: Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center IRB)

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

NEE

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

product vervaardigd in en geëxporteerd uit de V.S.

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren