Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Impact of Physical Activity on Successful Aging

27 janvier 2017 mis à jour par: prof. Federico Schena, Universita di Verona

Impact of Physical Activity on Successful Aging: Multidisciplinary Analysis of Mechanisms and Outcomes

Emerging literature suggests that vascular factors might be involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Other recent studies demonstrate the positive effects of physical activity on cognitive and behavioral disturbances of patients with AD. Therefore, it has been postulated that exercise enchantment in cerebral circulation is the physiological mechanism that link physical exercise and reduction of AD symptoms. Consequently, a program of physical activity could be considered one approach to counteract dementia by improving cerebrovascular health.

However at this moment, it is not clear if the progressive brain vascular dysfunction and hypoperfusion, associated with the β-amyloid deposition, might be reversed or stabilized by an exercise intervention.

The aim of this study is to assess, in patients with AD, the influence of physical exercise, compared to cognitive stimulation, on:

  • Cognitive function;
  • Independence in daily living and behavioral symptoms;
  • Vascular function Finally, to investigate the physiological processes on the basis of the motor parameters' changes, the performances of the patients will be compared with the performances of healthy young and old subjects.

MAIN OBJECTIVE: Investigate, in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and AD, the effects of a physical activity program, or cognitive stimulation on global cognitive function.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: Investigate the effects of the two treatments on:

  • cognitive and motor performances,
  • independence in activities of daily living,
  • behavioral symptoms,
  • peripheral vascular function.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

STUDY DESIGN:

Randomised controlled, blinded clinical trial.

SUBJECTS:

The study will include 120 patients with definite diagnosis of MCI or AD and 30 young healthy subjects and 30 old healthy subjects referred to the Research Unit associated with the Department.

Patients will be regarded as suitable to participate if they fulfilled the following criteria:

  • Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 8;
  • Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment ≥ 19 (POMA).

Exclusion criteria will be:

  • presence of other concurrent neurological diseases;
  • presence of other orthopaedic diseases involving the lower limbs and/or interfering with standing position and/or walking;
  • presence of severe auditory and visual deficits not corrected;
  • abuse of alcohol or drugs;
  • psychiatric disorders,
  • severe behavioral disorders;
  • hearth and respiratory disease that interfere with the motor activity. The protocol was be approved by the local ethics committee with number 2389. All participants will perform a physiatric examination by a medical doctor of the Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences. Written inform consent will be obtained from all participants before inclusion in the study.

Participants who will meet the inclusion criteria will conduct a clinical and instrumental evaluation at enrollment (T0) and after 6 months ± 15 days after the first visit (T1). The assessment procedures will also be repeated after 3 months (T2) from T1.

ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES

Primary endpoints:

- score obtained in the Mini Mental State Examination.

Secondary endpoints:

- score obtained in a cognitive battery.

For MCI patients will be used:

  • Trial Making Test (Reitan,1958),
  • Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test (Wilson, 1989),
  • Tower of London (Shallice, 1982),
  • Dual Task (Della Sala et al., 1997),
  • Frontal Assessment Battery (Iavarone A et al., 2004).

For AD patients will be used:

  • Attention Matrix (Spinnler et al., 1987),
  • Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (Rosen WG et al., 1984),
  • Frontal Assessment Battery (Iavarone A et al., 2004).

    - score obtained in a motor skills assessment composed by:

  • 6-Minute Walking Test (Ries JD et al., 2009),
  • gait analysis by GAITRite® System (Bilney B et al., 2003),
  • stabilometric assessments with Stability Line (Nashner LM and Peters JF, 1990),

    • score obtained in the test Instrumental Activity in Daily Living (Lawton MP and Brody EM, 1969),
    • score obtained in the test Neuropsychiatric Inventory (Cummings JL et al., 1994),
    • peripheral vascular function measured by doppler.

To evaluate the effectiveness of motor treatment, compared to a cognitive treatment on motor skills, cognitive skills, behavioral and autonomy in patients with cognitive decline, all patients will be evaluated by motor, cognitive, behavioral and autonomy scales, at baseline, after 6 months (T1), and after others 3 months (T2). A subgroup of 50% of patients will undergo instrumental procedures to investigate the effects of treatments on cerebral blood flow (arterial spin labeling).

TREATMENT PROCEDURES

The participants will be recruited and randomly assigned, according to the degree of cognitive decline, to one of the 3 groups (7-8 subjects):

  • Physical Activity group (PA group): It will perform a program consist of 15 min of warm-up, 60 min of aerobic and resistance training, and 15 min of cool-down.
  • Cognitive treatment group (CT group): The cognitive stimulation group will received a rehabilitation program with multimodal repetitive stimulation in order to exercise and reinforce the cognitive skills of the participant to slow/prevent the decline. In particular the treatment will be focused on reorient the patient about his/her-self, his/her history and his/her environment, to improve the memory skill by teaching compensatory and restitutive strategies, to help the patient to the discussion about everyday life and in particular to the everyday problems The PA and CT groups will be homogeneous for clinical and demographic data, and participants will undergo 72 treatment group sessions, 60-minute/session, and 3 days/week for 6 consecutively months.

Both types of treatment will be balanced with different degrees of difficulty depending on the state of disease severity .

o The control groups (CG) will not receive any such treatment during the study and they will be evaluated by the same clinical and instrumental assessments.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

90

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

65 ans à 90 ans (Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥ 65 years;
  • Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 8;
  • Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment ≥ 19 (POMA).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of other concurrent neurological diseases;
  • presence of other orthopaedic diseases involving the lower limbs and/or interfering with standing position and/or walking;
  • presence of severe auditory and visual deficits not corrected;
  • abuse of alcohol or drugs;
  • psychiatric disorders,
  • severe behavioral disorders;
  • hearth and respiratory disease that interfere with the motor activity.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Alzheimer's Disease (G1)
(G1) physical activity (PA)
It will perform a program consist of 15 min of warm-up, 60 min of aerobic and resistance training, and 15 min of cool-down.
Expérimental: Alzheimer's Disease (G2)
(G2) cognitive treatment (CT)
The cognitive stimulation group will received a rehabilitation program with multimodal repetitive stimulation in order to exercise and reinforce the cognitive skills of the participant to slow/prevent the decline. In particular the treatment will be focused on reorient the patient about his/her-self, his/her history and his/her environment, to improve the memory skill by teaching compensatory and restitutive strategies, to help the patient to the discussion about everyday life and in particular to the everyday problems
Aucune intervention: Healthy Old Subjects (G1)
Control group old
Aucune intervention: Healthy young Subjects (G2)
Control group young

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Délai
Mini Mental State Examination
Délai: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Trail Making Test
Délai: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For MCI patients (Reitan,1958)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test
Délai: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For MCI patients (Wilson, 1989)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Tower of London
Délai: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For MCI patients (Shallice, 1982)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Dual Task
Délai: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For MCI patients (Della Sala et al., 1997)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Frontal Assessment Battery
Délai: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
(Iavarone A et al., 2004)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Attention Matrix
Délai: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For AD patients (Spinnler et al., 1987)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale
Délai: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For AD patients (Rosen WG et al., 1984)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
6-Minute Walking Test
Délai: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
(Ries JD et al., 2009)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
gait analysis by GAITRite® System
Délai: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
(Bilney B et al., 2003)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
stabilometric assessments with Stability Line
Délai: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
(Nashner LM and Peters JF, 1990),
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Instrumental Activity in Daily Living Scale (IADL)
Délai: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Neuropsychiatric Inventory Scale (NPI)
Délai: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
cerebral circulation
Délai: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
measured MRI arterial spin labeling
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
peripheral vascular function
Délai: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
measured by vascular doppler
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chaise d'étude: Nicola Smania, Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences
  • Chercheur principal: Federico Schena, Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 septembre 2013

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 mai 2016

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 octobre 2016

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

10 janvier 2017

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

24 janvier 2017

Première publication (Estimation)

27 janvier 2017

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

30 janvier 2017

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

27 janvier 2017

Dernière vérification

1 janvier 2017

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner