Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Impact of Physical Activity on Successful Aging

27 de enero de 2017 actualizado por: prof. Federico Schena, Universita di Verona

Impact of Physical Activity on Successful Aging: Multidisciplinary Analysis of Mechanisms and Outcomes

Emerging literature suggests that vascular factors might be involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Other recent studies demonstrate the positive effects of physical activity on cognitive and behavioral disturbances of patients with AD. Therefore, it has been postulated that exercise enchantment in cerebral circulation is the physiological mechanism that link physical exercise and reduction of AD symptoms. Consequently, a program of physical activity could be considered one approach to counteract dementia by improving cerebrovascular health.

However at this moment, it is not clear if the progressive brain vascular dysfunction and hypoperfusion, associated with the β-amyloid deposition, might be reversed or stabilized by an exercise intervention.

The aim of this study is to assess, in patients with AD, the influence of physical exercise, compared to cognitive stimulation, on:

  • Cognitive function;
  • Independence in daily living and behavioral symptoms;
  • Vascular function Finally, to investigate the physiological processes on the basis of the motor parameters' changes, the performances of the patients will be compared with the performances of healthy young and old subjects.

MAIN OBJECTIVE: Investigate, in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and AD, the effects of a physical activity program, or cognitive stimulation on global cognitive function.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: Investigate the effects of the two treatments on:

  • cognitive and motor performances,
  • independence in activities of daily living,
  • behavioral symptoms,
  • peripheral vascular function.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

STUDY DESIGN:

Randomised controlled, blinded clinical trial.

SUBJECTS:

The study will include 120 patients with definite diagnosis of MCI or AD and 30 young healthy subjects and 30 old healthy subjects referred to the Research Unit associated with the Department.

Patients will be regarded as suitable to participate if they fulfilled the following criteria:

  • Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 8;
  • Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment ≥ 19 (POMA).

Exclusion criteria will be:

  • presence of other concurrent neurological diseases;
  • presence of other orthopaedic diseases involving the lower limbs and/or interfering with standing position and/or walking;
  • presence of severe auditory and visual deficits not corrected;
  • abuse of alcohol or drugs;
  • psychiatric disorders,
  • severe behavioral disorders;
  • hearth and respiratory disease that interfere with the motor activity. The protocol was be approved by the local ethics committee with number 2389. All participants will perform a physiatric examination by a medical doctor of the Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences. Written inform consent will be obtained from all participants before inclusion in the study.

Participants who will meet the inclusion criteria will conduct a clinical and instrumental evaluation at enrollment (T0) and after 6 months ± 15 days after the first visit (T1). The assessment procedures will also be repeated after 3 months (T2) from T1.

ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES

Primary endpoints:

- score obtained in the Mini Mental State Examination.

Secondary endpoints:

- score obtained in a cognitive battery.

For MCI patients will be used:

  • Trial Making Test (Reitan,1958),
  • Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test (Wilson, 1989),
  • Tower of London (Shallice, 1982),
  • Dual Task (Della Sala et al., 1997),
  • Frontal Assessment Battery (Iavarone A et al., 2004).

For AD patients will be used:

  • Attention Matrix (Spinnler et al., 1987),
  • Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (Rosen WG et al., 1984),
  • Frontal Assessment Battery (Iavarone A et al., 2004).

    - score obtained in a motor skills assessment composed by:

  • 6-Minute Walking Test (Ries JD et al., 2009),
  • gait analysis by GAITRite® System (Bilney B et al., 2003),
  • stabilometric assessments with Stability Line (Nashner LM and Peters JF, 1990),

    • score obtained in the test Instrumental Activity in Daily Living (Lawton MP and Brody EM, 1969),
    • score obtained in the test Neuropsychiatric Inventory (Cummings JL et al., 1994),
    • peripheral vascular function measured by doppler.

To evaluate the effectiveness of motor treatment, compared to a cognitive treatment on motor skills, cognitive skills, behavioral and autonomy in patients with cognitive decline, all patients will be evaluated by motor, cognitive, behavioral and autonomy scales, at baseline, after 6 months (T1), and after others 3 months (T2). A subgroup of 50% of patients will undergo instrumental procedures to investigate the effects of treatments on cerebral blood flow (arterial spin labeling).

TREATMENT PROCEDURES

The participants will be recruited and randomly assigned, according to the degree of cognitive decline, to one of the 3 groups (7-8 subjects):

  • Physical Activity group (PA group): It will perform a program consist of 15 min of warm-up, 60 min of aerobic and resistance training, and 15 min of cool-down.
  • Cognitive treatment group (CT group): The cognitive stimulation group will received a rehabilitation program with multimodal repetitive stimulation in order to exercise and reinforce the cognitive skills of the participant to slow/prevent the decline. In particular the treatment will be focused on reorient the patient about his/her-self, his/her history and his/her environment, to improve the memory skill by teaching compensatory and restitutive strategies, to help the patient to the discussion about everyday life and in particular to the everyday problems The PA and CT groups will be homogeneous for clinical and demographic data, and participants will undergo 72 treatment group sessions, 60-minute/session, and 3 days/week for 6 consecutively months.

Both types of treatment will be balanced with different degrees of difficulty depending on the state of disease severity .

o The control groups (CG) will not receive any such treatment during the study and they will be evaluated by the same clinical and instrumental assessments.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

90

Fase

  • No aplica

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

65 años a 90 años (Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥ 65 years;
  • Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 8;
  • Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment ≥ 19 (POMA).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of other concurrent neurological diseases;
  • presence of other orthopaedic diseases involving the lower limbs and/or interfering with standing position and/or walking;
  • presence of severe auditory and visual deficits not corrected;
  • abuse of alcohol or drugs;
  • psychiatric disorders,
  • severe behavioral disorders;
  • hearth and respiratory disease that interfere with the motor activity.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Alzheimer's Disease (G1)
(G1) physical activity (PA)
It will perform a program consist of 15 min of warm-up, 60 min of aerobic and resistance training, and 15 min of cool-down.
Experimental: Alzheimer's Disease (G2)
(G2) cognitive treatment (CT)
The cognitive stimulation group will received a rehabilitation program with multimodal repetitive stimulation in order to exercise and reinforce the cognitive skills of the participant to slow/prevent the decline. In particular the treatment will be focused on reorient the patient about his/her-self, his/her history and his/her environment, to improve the memory skill by teaching compensatory and restitutive strategies, to help the patient to the discussion about everyday life and in particular to the everyday problems
Sin intervención: Healthy Old Subjects (G1)
Control group old
Sin intervención: Healthy young Subjects (G2)
Control group young

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Periodo de tiempo
Mini Mental State Examination
Periodo de tiempo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Trail Making Test
Periodo de tiempo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For MCI patients (Reitan,1958)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test
Periodo de tiempo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For MCI patients (Wilson, 1989)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Tower of London
Periodo de tiempo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For MCI patients (Shallice, 1982)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Dual Task
Periodo de tiempo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For MCI patients (Della Sala et al., 1997)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Frontal Assessment Battery
Periodo de tiempo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
(Iavarone A et al., 2004)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Attention Matrix
Periodo de tiempo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For AD patients (Spinnler et al., 1987)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale
Periodo de tiempo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For AD patients (Rosen WG et al., 1984)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
6-Minute Walking Test
Periodo de tiempo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
(Ries JD et al., 2009)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
gait analysis by GAITRite® System
Periodo de tiempo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
(Bilney B et al., 2003)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
stabilometric assessments with Stability Line
Periodo de tiempo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
(Nashner LM and Peters JF, 1990),
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Instrumental Activity in Daily Living Scale (IADL)
Periodo de tiempo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Neuropsychiatric Inventory Scale (NPI)
Periodo de tiempo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
cerebral circulation
Periodo de tiempo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
measured MRI arterial spin labeling
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
peripheral vascular function
Periodo de tiempo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
measured by vascular doppler
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Silla de estudio: Nicola Smania, Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences
  • Investigador principal: Federico Schena, Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de septiembre de 2013

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de mayo de 2016

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de octubre de 2016

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

10 de enero de 2017

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

24 de enero de 2017

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

27 de enero de 2017

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

30 de enero de 2017

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

27 de enero de 2017

Última verificación

1 de enero de 2017

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Ensayos clínicos sobre Physical activity (PA)

3
Suscribir