Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Impact of Physical Activity on Successful Aging

27 de janeiro de 2017 atualizado por: prof. Federico Schena, Universita di Verona

Impact of Physical Activity on Successful Aging: Multidisciplinary Analysis of Mechanisms and Outcomes

Emerging literature suggests that vascular factors might be involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Other recent studies demonstrate the positive effects of physical activity on cognitive and behavioral disturbances of patients with AD. Therefore, it has been postulated that exercise enchantment in cerebral circulation is the physiological mechanism that link physical exercise and reduction of AD symptoms. Consequently, a program of physical activity could be considered one approach to counteract dementia by improving cerebrovascular health.

However at this moment, it is not clear if the progressive brain vascular dysfunction and hypoperfusion, associated with the β-amyloid deposition, might be reversed or stabilized by an exercise intervention.

The aim of this study is to assess, in patients with AD, the influence of physical exercise, compared to cognitive stimulation, on:

  • Cognitive function;
  • Independence in daily living and behavioral symptoms;
  • Vascular function Finally, to investigate the physiological processes on the basis of the motor parameters' changes, the performances of the patients will be compared with the performances of healthy young and old subjects.

MAIN OBJECTIVE: Investigate, in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and AD, the effects of a physical activity program, or cognitive stimulation on global cognitive function.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: Investigate the effects of the two treatments on:

  • cognitive and motor performances,
  • independence in activities of daily living,
  • behavioral symptoms,
  • peripheral vascular function.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

STUDY DESIGN:

Randomised controlled, blinded clinical trial.

SUBJECTS:

The study will include 120 patients with definite diagnosis of MCI or AD and 30 young healthy subjects and 30 old healthy subjects referred to the Research Unit associated with the Department.

Patients will be regarded as suitable to participate if they fulfilled the following criteria:

  • Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 8;
  • Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment ≥ 19 (POMA).

Exclusion criteria will be:

  • presence of other concurrent neurological diseases;
  • presence of other orthopaedic diseases involving the lower limbs and/or interfering with standing position and/or walking;
  • presence of severe auditory and visual deficits not corrected;
  • abuse of alcohol or drugs;
  • psychiatric disorders,
  • severe behavioral disorders;
  • hearth and respiratory disease that interfere with the motor activity. The protocol was be approved by the local ethics committee with number 2389. All participants will perform a physiatric examination by a medical doctor of the Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences. Written inform consent will be obtained from all participants before inclusion in the study.

Participants who will meet the inclusion criteria will conduct a clinical and instrumental evaluation at enrollment (T0) and after 6 months ± 15 days after the first visit (T1). The assessment procedures will also be repeated after 3 months (T2) from T1.

ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES

Primary endpoints:

- score obtained in the Mini Mental State Examination.

Secondary endpoints:

- score obtained in a cognitive battery.

For MCI patients will be used:

  • Trial Making Test (Reitan,1958),
  • Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test (Wilson, 1989),
  • Tower of London (Shallice, 1982),
  • Dual Task (Della Sala et al., 1997),
  • Frontal Assessment Battery (Iavarone A et al., 2004).

For AD patients will be used:

  • Attention Matrix (Spinnler et al., 1987),
  • Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (Rosen WG et al., 1984),
  • Frontal Assessment Battery (Iavarone A et al., 2004).

    - score obtained in a motor skills assessment composed by:

  • 6-Minute Walking Test (Ries JD et al., 2009),
  • gait analysis by GAITRite® System (Bilney B et al., 2003),
  • stabilometric assessments with Stability Line (Nashner LM and Peters JF, 1990),

    • score obtained in the test Instrumental Activity in Daily Living (Lawton MP and Brody EM, 1969),
    • score obtained in the test Neuropsychiatric Inventory (Cummings JL et al., 1994),
    • peripheral vascular function measured by doppler.

To evaluate the effectiveness of motor treatment, compared to a cognitive treatment on motor skills, cognitive skills, behavioral and autonomy in patients with cognitive decline, all patients will be evaluated by motor, cognitive, behavioral and autonomy scales, at baseline, after 6 months (T1), and after others 3 months (T2). A subgroup of 50% of patients will undergo instrumental procedures to investigate the effects of treatments on cerebral blood flow (arterial spin labeling).

TREATMENT PROCEDURES

The participants will be recruited and randomly assigned, according to the degree of cognitive decline, to one of the 3 groups (7-8 subjects):

  • Physical Activity group (PA group): It will perform a program consist of 15 min of warm-up, 60 min of aerobic and resistance training, and 15 min of cool-down.
  • Cognitive treatment group (CT group): The cognitive stimulation group will received a rehabilitation program with multimodal repetitive stimulation in order to exercise and reinforce the cognitive skills of the participant to slow/prevent the decline. In particular the treatment will be focused on reorient the patient about his/her-self, his/her history and his/her environment, to improve the memory skill by teaching compensatory and restitutive strategies, to help the patient to the discussion about everyday life and in particular to the everyday problems The PA and CT groups will be homogeneous for clinical and demographic data, and participants will undergo 72 treatment group sessions, 60-minute/session, and 3 days/week for 6 consecutively months.

Both types of treatment will be balanced with different degrees of difficulty depending on the state of disease severity .

o The control groups (CG) will not receive any such treatment during the study and they will be evaluated by the same clinical and instrumental assessments.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

90

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

65 anos a 90 anos (Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥ 65 years;
  • Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 8;
  • Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment ≥ 19 (POMA).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of other concurrent neurological diseases;
  • presence of other orthopaedic diseases involving the lower limbs and/or interfering with standing position and/or walking;
  • presence of severe auditory and visual deficits not corrected;
  • abuse of alcohol or drugs;
  • psychiatric disorders,
  • severe behavioral disorders;
  • hearth and respiratory disease that interfere with the motor activity.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Alzheimer's Disease (G1)
(G1) physical activity (PA)
It will perform a program consist of 15 min of warm-up, 60 min of aerobic and resistance training, and 15 min of cool-down.
Experimental: Alzheimer's Disease (G2)
(G2) cognitive treatment (CT)
The cognitive stimulation group will received a rehabilitation program with multimodal repetitive stimulation in order to exercise and reinforce the cognitive skills of the participant to slow/prevent the decline. In particular the treatment will be focused on reorient the patient about his/her-self, his/her history and his/her environment, to improve the memory skill by teaching compensatory and restitutive strategies, to help the patient to the discussion about everyday life and in particular to the everyday problems
Sem intervenção: Healthy Old Subjects (G1)
Control group old
Sem intervenção: Healthy young Subjects (G2)
Control group young

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Prazo
Mini Mental State Examination
Prazo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Trail Making Test
Prazo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For MCI patients (Reitan,1958)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test
Prazo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For MCI patients (Wilson, 1989)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Tower of London
Prazo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For MCI patients (Shallice, 1982)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Dual Task
Prazo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For MCI patients (Della Sala et al., 1997)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Frontal Assessment Battery
Prazo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
(Iavarone A et al., 2004)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Attention Matrix
Prazo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For AD patients (Spinnler et al., 1987)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale
Prazo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
For AD patients (Rosen WG et al., 1984)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
6-Minute Walking Test
Prazo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
(Ries JD et al., 2009)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
gait analysis by GAITRite® System
Prazo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
(Bilney B et al., 2003)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
stabilometric assessments with Stability Line
Prazo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
(Nashner LM and Peters JF, 1990),
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Instrumental Activity in Daily Living Scale (IADL)
Prazo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
Neuropsychiatric Inventory Scale (NPI)
Prazo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
cerebral circulation
Prazo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
measured MRI arterial spin labeling
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
peripheral vascular function
Prazo: 0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)
measured by vascular doppler
0-6-9 months (change will be assessed)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Cadeira de estudo: Nicola Smania, Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences
  • Investigador principal: Federico Schena, Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Publicações Gerais

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo

1 de setembro de 2013

Conclusão Primária (Real)

1 de maio de 2016

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

1 de outubro de 2016

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

10 de janeiro de 2017

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

24 de janeiro de 2017

Primeira postagem (Estimativa)

27 de janeiro de 2017

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Estimativa)

30 de janeiro de 2017

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

27 de janeiro de 2017

Última verificação

1 de janeiro de 2017

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever