Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

ATI Evidence-based Guide Investigating Medical and Preventative Services

28 avril 2026 mis à jour par: Natalie Myers, ATI Holdings, LLC

Utilization and Effectiveness of Sports Medicine Services

To use existing standard-of-care documentation in a sports medicine electronic medical record (EMR) to evaluate patient characteristics, interventions delivered, utilization management, and clinical outcomes in routine sports medicine care, in order to generate evidence to improve clinical effectiveness and quality of care.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Actif, ne recrute pas

Les conditions

Description détaillée

Musculoskeletal (MSK) and sports related injuries are highly prevalent across active and athletic populations and represent a substantial source of healthcare utilization, time loss from participation and a limitation in performance. Often these injuries vary from mechanism, acuity, and severity, ranging from acute traumatic events to chronic overuse conditions. Effective management of these sports-related injuries requires a coordinated effort aimed at helping athletes restore function, minimize the risk of re-injury and facilitating a safe return to sport. Sports Medicine rehabilitation is a widely recognized as a key component of nonoperative care, with evidence that supports the role of athletic trainers to support athletes in improving patient related outcomes, functional performance and return to sport timelines. However, variability does exist in how care is delivered across the sports medicine setting, providers and injury types which may influence both outcomes and resource utilization, underscoring the need to understand how value is achieved within sports medicine rehabilitation.

To address these priorities, investigators from ATI and the University of South Carolina are interested in evaluating how standard-of-care within sports medicine is delivered and how variation in care delivery mechanisms relates to clinical outcomes, value and service utilization. In this retrospective study, The investigators will conduct secondary analyses of existing standard-of-care documentation within ATI's sports medicine EMR, without altering clinical care or interacting with patients. Key variables of interest include: (1) injury and patient characteristics (ie. body region, surgical v. non-surgical status, acuity); (2) functional and performance outcomes (ie. patient reported outcomes, return to sport status); (3) utilization metrics (ie. number of visits, duration of care and frequency); (4) care delivery characteristics (ie. interventions, neuromuscular training, manual therapy and modality use); and delivery care (ie. in clinic, hybrid). By examining how the above variables interact, this study aims to better characterize rehabilitation of athletes receiving sports medicine services and identifying opportunities to optimize outcomes and value.

Investigators have previously used ATI clinical outcomes resources to characterize care patterns, evaluate outcomes and measurement properties, and explore predictors of utilization behaviors such as canceled visits. The present protocol extends this work by leveraging existing standard-of-care EMR documentation to evaluate patient characteristics, interventions delivered, utilization management patterns, and clinical and objective/functional outcomes in routine outpatient care, producing evidence to inform clinical effectiveness, quality improvement, implementation efforts, and policy-relevant value questions.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Estimé)

550000

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Illinois
      • Downers Grove, Illinois, États-Unis, 60515
        • ATI

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

12 ans à 25 ans (Enfant, Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon non probabiliste

Population étudiée

Individuals receiving medical and/or preventative services when part of an organized sports team.

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

Care setting and timeframe: Received sports medicine services at ATI Physical Therapy, with documentation available in the ATI Sports Medicine EMR, on or after January 1, 2018, through the date of data extraction.

Age range: Sports participants including middle school, high school and collegiate aged including adolescents through young adults that have been documented in the EMR.

Record availability: Have an EMR record that includes the minimum data elements necessary to address the study objectives (e.g., episode identifiers/dates sufficient to define an episode of care, diagnosis/body region, utilization variables, and at least one routinely collected outcome measure when applicable to the specific analysis).

Standard-of-care data: Data were collected as part of routine clinical care/documentation prior to and independent of this research study.

Exclusion Criteria:

The record is outside the eligible timeframe or does not reflect sports medicine care at ATI.

The record is a duplicate or cannot be reliably linked within the data source to a single episode/patient for analysis.

The record lacks the minimum necessary variables required for the specific analysis (e.g., missing episode dates needed to define utilization metrics; missing baseline/discharge outcome for analyses requiring change scores).

The data are corrupted, internally inconsistent (e.g., impossible dates), or otherwise unsuitable for analysis after standard data cleaning.

The record cannot be adequately coded/de-identified for analysis and reporting under the study's privacy/confidentiality procedures.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Délai: Baseline (Day 1 at Evaluation), throughout patient's episode of care asked each visit, on average up to 12 weeks
Subjective; Patients rate pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Baseline (Day 1 at Evaluation), throughout patient's episode of care asked each visit, on average up to 12 weeks
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
Délai: Administered at initial evaluation, and every 4th visit for the patient's episode of care (on average 12 weeks).
Subjective, Patient-perceived overall function or pain related to a specific condition compared to pre-injury. 0% (least possible) to 100% (most possible/normal)
Administered at initial evaluation, and every 4th visit for the patient's episode of care (on average 12 weeks).

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Les enquêteurs

  • Chaise d'étude: Chris Stout, PsyD, ATI

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

  • Herring SA. The team physician and return-to-play issues: a consensus statement. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2002;34(7):1212-1214.
  • Martin CL, Greene J, David RB, Kliethermes S, Naylor J, Kucera K. Athletic Trainers as Outpatient Rehabilitation Providers: An Analysis of Role, Value, and Insurance Reimbursement in a Large Academic Healthcare System. Journal of Athletic Training. 2025;1(aop)
  • Patel DR, Yamasaki A, Brown K. Epidemiology of sports-related musculoskeletal injuries in young athletes in United States. Translational pediatrics. 2017;6(3):160.
  • Brenner JS, Watson A. Overuse injuries, overtraining, and burnout in young athletes. Pediatrics. 2024;153(2):e2023065129.
  • Coronado VG, Haileyesus T, Cheng TA, et al. Trends in sports-and recreation-related traumatic brain injuries treated in US emergency departments: the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-All Injury Program (NEISS-AIP) 2001-2012. The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation. 2015;30(3):185-197.
  • Rui P, Ashman JJ, Akinseye A. Emergency department visits for injuries sustained during sports and recreational activities by patients aged 5-24 years, 2010-2016. 2019

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

23 avril 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

23 avril 2029

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

23 avril 2029

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

5 août 2019

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

7 août 2019

Première publication (Réel)

8 août 2019

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

4 mai 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

28 avril 2026

Dernière vérification

1 avril 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

INDÉCIS

Description du régime IPD

Aggregated non-Private Health Information and non-Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act data may potentially be made available upon request.

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner