Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Performance Feedback in Health Care

1 octobre 2020 mis à jour par: Felipe Lobelo, Kaiser Permanente

The Southeast Permanente Medical Group (TSPMG) at Kaiser Permanente Georgia provides performance feedback to its providers. The performance feedback designs can vary and change over time in terms of targets, summary statistics, included measures, and frequency of delivery. The TSPMG health services research group seek to compare different performance feedback designs to identify which are most effective at contributing to performance improvement.

The research team will randomly assign providers into different performance feedback conditions, as specified in the protocol. Providers will receive performance feedback through the standard mechanism in which it is conveyed by their supervisor.

The objective is to investigate how to design performance feedback for providers to best motivate and support them in improving performance along with existing strategic priorities for care delivery.

The reserach team will test alternative designs of performance feedback that vary on the following dimension:

1) targets for comparison of one's own performance

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

The Southeast Permanente Medical Group (TSPMG) provides performance feedback to its providers. The performance feedback designs can vary and change over time in terms of targets, summary statistics, included measures, and frequency of delivery. The TSPMG health services research team will seek to compare different performance feedback designs to identify which are most effective at contributing to performance improvement. .

The research team will randomly assign providers into different performance feedback conditions, as specified in the protocol. Providers will receive performance feedback through the standard mechanism in which it is conveyed by their supervisor.

The objective is to investigate how to design performance feedback for providers to best motivate and support them in improving performance along with existing strategic priorities for care delivery.

The research team will test alternative designs of performance feedback that vary on the following dimension:

1) targets for comparison of one's own performance

The research team will provide feedback on performance by measures that the organization already tracks internally and uses for performance improvement. These include a provider's utilization of opportunities to provide flu vaccinations.

The study will randomly assign different designs of feedback to providers. In order to understand which designs of feedback have the best effects on performance, the research team will test the following hypotheses:

  1. Displaying the next-highest quartile will motivate improvement more than display of all quartiles.

    Theory: The next-highest quartile will serve as an injunctive norm, or suggested target, to repeatedly lift an individual's performance to the suggested level.

  2. The positive effect of displaying the next-highest quartile, relative to displaying all quartiles, will be most pronounced for initially low performers.

    Theory: The next highest quartile averts upward social comparison to a much higher level of peer performance, which can be discouraging and so negatively affect performance

  3. The positive effect of displaying the next-highest quartile, relative to displaying all quartiles, will diminish over time.

    Theory: Individuals may become worn out as they see a target ratchet higher when their performance improves.

  4. Displaying team relative performance along with individual relative performance will be more effective than displaying either type of information alone.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

595

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, États-Unis, 30305
        • Kaiser Permanente Georgia Regional Offices

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant
  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

A healthcare provider practicing at The Southeast Permanente Medical Group in a specialty for which the performance measure being studied is relevant.

Health care providers include:

Physicians, Nurse Practitioner, Certified Nurse Midwife, Psych Nurse Specialist, Optometrist, Podiatrist, and Physician Assistant

Exclusion Criteria:

Non-Physicians: Registered Nurses excluding nurse practitioners

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Recherche sur les services de santé
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Organizational Target
Providers are shown the flu success performance rate of their team (a "pod," or group of providers who practice together), in comparison to their own, and with the organizational target. These updates and targets are sent bi-weekly.

A given provider will be involved in the study for a maximum of 6 months. This will involve, at the most frequent, the delivery of weekly performance feedback.

The performance feedback will be delivered using standard approaches already in place in the organization and there will not be a period of seeking out participants for enrollment.

Providers will receive performance feedback bi-weekly for the duration of the study period.

Expérimental: Achievable Target
Providers are shown the flu success performance rate of their team (a "pod," or group of providers who practice together), in comparison to their own. They will receive a static and achievable target based on their previous year's flu vaccination success rate.

A given provider will be involved in the study for a maximum of 6 months. This will involve, at the most frequent, the delivery of weekly performance feedback.

The performance feedback will be delivered using standard approaches already in place in the organization and there will not be a period of seeking out participants for enrollment.

Providers will receive performance feedback bi-weekly for the duration of the study period.

Expérimental: Variable
Providers are shown the flu success performance rate of their team (a "pod," or group of providers who practice together), in comparison to their own. They will receive a variable target that will fluctuate bi-weekly, based on their previous bi-weekly flu vaccination success rate.

A given provider will be involved in the study for a maximum of 6 months. This will involve, at the most frequent, the delivery of weekly performance feedback.

The performance feedback will be delivered using standard approaches already in place in the organization and there will not be a period of seeking out participants for enrollment.

Providers will receive performance feedback bi-weekly for the duration of the study period.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Flu Vaccination Administered During Encounter
Délai: 10 Weeks
Whether or not the providers succeeded in administering flu vaccination during flu vaccination opportunity
10 Weeks

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

23 septembre 2019

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

31 décembre 2019

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

31 décembre 2019

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

9 septembre 2020

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

1 octobre 2020

Première publication (Réel)

8 octobre 2020

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

8 octobre 2020

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

1 octobre 2020

Dernière vérification

1 octobre 2020

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner