- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT07585058
Safety and Efficacy of Early Brain-Computer Interface Training After Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke (RT-BCI)
This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of early EEG-based non-invasive brain-computer interface (EEG-BCI) training as an add-on to standard early rehabilitation in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after reperfusion therapy. Eligible participants are adults aged 18 to 80 years with unilateral limb motor dysfunction after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Participants will be randomized to receive either standard early rehabilitation plus closed-loop EEG-BCI dual-module virtual hand and gait training, or standard early rehabilitation alone.
The EEG-BCI intervention includes upper-limb virtual hand training and lower-limb gait/ankle dorsiflexion training, delivered twice daily for approximately 20 minutes per session over 5 consecutive days. The primary outcome is the change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score from baseline (T0) to Day 30. Secondary outcomes include upper- and lower-limb motor function, ambulation, neurological status, disability, and activities of daily living. Safety and feasibility outcomes will also be assessed.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Wang Chen, MD
- Numéro de téléphone: +86-68773274
- E-mail: chenwang@sph.com.cn
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1. Age 18 to 80 years.
- 2. Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with reperfusion therapy, including intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or mechanical thrombectomy (MT); for participants undergoing MT, successful recanalization during the procedure defined as eTICI 2b-3.
- 3. Meets the protocol-defined clinical stability criteria for the corresponding treatment pathway (see Section 4.3).
- 4. Unilateral limb motor dysfunction on the same side as the dominant hand.
- 5. Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score of 10 to 50 at T0.
- 6. Pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score <= 2.
- 7. Written informed consent provided by the participant and ability to comply with training and follow-up; if necessary, consent may be provided by a legally authorized representative.
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1. Imaging-confirmed symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), or bleeding risk considered unacceptable by the investigator and requiring a change in treatment strategy.
- 2. Overt progressive neurological deterioration or need for urgent intervention, making training inappropriate, such as an increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of >=4 from a prior assessment with cause not yet clarified or stabilized.
- 3. Severe disturbance of consciousness, severe aphasia or neglect, or significant cognitive impairment that would prevent completion of BCI training tasks or primary outcome assessment.
- 4. Bilateral significant motor impairment, such as brainstem or bilateral lesions, or pre-existing moderate-to-severe disability of the contralateral upper or lower limb, which would interfere with training or interpretation of assessments under the unilateral impairment framework.
- 5. Severe comorbidity or unstable vital signs, including but not limited to unstable arrhythmia, severe heart failure or respiratory failure, active severe infection or sepsis, or severe hepatic or renal failure, such that the investigator judges the participant unable to safely complete training and follow-up.
- 6. Severe scalp skin damage or infection, or any other condition preventing safe use of the EEG electrode cap.
- 7. Frequent seizures within 7 days before randomization, or seizure risk considered unacceptable by the investigator.
- 8. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- 9. Participation in another interventional clinical study that may affect the outcomes of this study, or any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the participant unsuitable for enrollment.
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Experimental BCI Rehabilitation Group
Standard early rehabilitation plus early EEG-BCI dual-module virtual hand and gait training
|
Closed-loop EEG-based non-invasive brain-computer interface training added to standard early rehabilitation, including virtual hand training for the upper limb and gait/ankle dorsiflexion training for the lower limb.
Training is delivered twice daily, approximately 20 minutes per session, for 5 consecutive days.
Participants receive site-standard early rehabilitation according to the local rehabilitation protocol.
|
|
Comparateur actif: Standard Early Rehabilitation Group
Standard early rehabilitation without additional BCI training.
|
Participants receive site-standard early rehabilitation according to the local rehabilitation protocol.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score
Délai: Baseline (T0), Day 30
|
Change is calculated as the Day 30 FMA-UE score minus the baseline (T0) FMA-UE score.
Higher positive values indicate greater improvement in upper-extremity motor function.
T0 is defined as 48 hours after IVT for the IVT-only pathway, and Day 5 (120 ± 24 hours) after MT for the MT ± IVT pathway.
|
Baseline (T0), Day 30
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score
Délai: Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Upper-extremity motor impairment assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity.
Higher scores indicate better upper-extremity motor function.
|
Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
|
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) score
Délai: Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Upper-limb activity limitation assessed using the Action Research Arm Test.
Higher scores indicate better upper-limb function.
|
Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) score
Délai: Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Lower-extremity motor impairment assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Lower Extremity.
Higher scores indicate better lower-extremity motor function.
|
Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
|
Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) score
Délai: Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Walking ability assessed using the Functional Ambulation Category.
Higher scores indicate greater independence in ambulation.
|
Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
|
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) performance
Délai: Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Walking performance assessed by the 10-Meter Walk Test in participants who meet prespecified walking criteria.
Walking speed and/or time required to complete the test will be recorded.
|
Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
|
Timed Up and Go (TUG) test performance
Délai: Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Functional mobility assessed by the Timed Up and Go test in participants who meet prespecified walking criteria.
Time required to complete the test will be recorded.
|
Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
|
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score
Délai: Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Neurological deficit severity assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.
Lower scores indicate less severe neurological impairment.
|
Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
|
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score
Délai: Day 30, Day 90
|
Global disability assessed using the modified Rankin Scale.
Lower scores indicate less disability and greater functional independence.
|
Day 30, Day 90
|
|
Barthel Index (BI) / Modified Barthel Index (MBI) score
Délai: Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Activities of daily living assessed using the Barthel Index or Modified Barthel Index, according to the scale used at each study site.
Higher scores indicate better functional independence in daily activities.
|
Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Autres mesures de résultats
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Screening-to-enrollment ratio
Délai: Through completion of recruitment, an estimated 16 months
|
Feasibility outcome defined as the number of participants enrolled and randomized divided by the total number of participants screened.
|
Through completion of recruitment, an estimated 16 months
|
|
Intervention adherence rate
Délai: During the 5-day intervention period
|
Feasibility outcome defined as the proportion of planned training sessions completed by each participant.
|
During the 5-day intervention period
|
|
Effective BCI training duration
Délai: During the 5-day intervention period
|
Feasibility outcome defined as the cumulative duration of valid BCI training completed during the intervention period.
|
During the 5-day intervention period
|
|
EEG signal quality and classification accuracy
Délai: During the 5-day intervention period
|
Feasibility outcome assessing the quality of EEG acquisition and the performance of signal classification during BCI training sessions.
|
During the 5-day intervention period
|
|
Follow-up completion rate
Délai: Through Day 90
|
Feasibility outcome defined as the proportion of randomized participants who complete scheduled outcome assessments through Day 90.
|
Through Day 90
|
|
Protocol deviation rate
Délai: From randomization through Day 90
|
Feasibility outcome defined as the proportion of participants with one or more protocol deviations.
|
From randomization through Day 90
|
|
Incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
Délai: From T0 through Day 30
|
Safety outcome defined as the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after study enrollment.
|
From T0 through Day 30
|
|
Incidence of any intracranial hemorrhage
Délai: From T0 through Day 30
|
Safety outcome defined as the occurrence of any type of intracranial hemorrhage after study enrollment.
|
From T0 through Day 30
|
|
Incidence of neurological deterioration
Délai: From T0 through Day 30
|
Safety outcome defined as clinical neurological worsening after study enrollment according to the study protocol.
|
From T0 through Day 30
|
|
Incidence of seizures
Délai: From T0 through Day 30
|
Safety outcome defined as the occurrence of seizure events after study enrollment.
|
From T0 through Day 30
|
|
Incidence of falls
Délai: From T0 through Day 30
|
Safety outcome defined as the occurrence of falls during the study period.
|
From T0 through Day 30
|
|
Incidence of blood pressure or cardiac rhythm adverse events
Délai: From T0 through Day 30
|
Safety outcome defined as blood pressure instability or cardiac arrhythmia events occurring during the study period.
|
From T0 through Day 30
|
|
Incidence of puncture-site bleeding or hematoma
Délai: From T0 through Day 30
|
Safety outcome assessed in participants in the MT pathway, defined as puncture-site bleeding or hematoma after mechanical thrombectomy.
|
From T0 through Day 30
|
|
Incidence of training-related discomfort
Délai: During the 5-day intervention period
|
Safety outcome defined as training-related discomfort, including fatigue, headache, skin irritation, or other reported discomfort associated with the intervention.
|
During the 5-day intervention period
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: QinJian Sun, MD, Shandong Provincial Hospital
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- RT-BCI-2026-0219
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Description du régime IPD
Délai de partage IPD
Critères d'accès au partage IPD
Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD
- PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
- SÈVE
- CIF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- RSE
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .