- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk utprøving NCT07585058
Safety and Efficacy of Early Brain-Computer Interface Training After Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke (RT-BCI)
This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of early EEG-based non-invasive brain-computer interface (EEG-BCI) training as an add-on to standard early rehabilitation in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after reperfusion therapy. Eligible participants are adults aged 18 to 80 years with unilateral limb motor dysfunction after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Participants will be randomized to receive either standard early rehabilitation plus closed-loop EEG-BCI dual-module virtual hand and gait training, or standard early rehabilitation alone.
The EEG-BCI intervention includes upper-limb virtual hand training and lower-limb gait/ankle dorsiflexion training, delivered twice daily for approximately 20 minutes per session over 5 consecutive days. The primary outcome is the change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score from baseline (T0) to Day 30. Secondary outcomes include upper- and lower-limb motor function, ambulation, neurological status, disability, and activities of daily living. Safety and feasibility outcomes will also be assessed.
Studieoversikt
Status
Forhold
Studietype
Registrering (Antatt)
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiekontakt
- Navn: Wang Chen, MD
- Telefonnummer: +86-68773274
- E-post: chenwang@sph.com.cn
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
- Voksen
- Eldre voksen
Tar imot friske frivillige
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1. Age 18 to 80 years.
- 2. Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with reperfusion therapy, including intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or mechanical thrombectomy (MT); for participants undergoing MT, successful recanalization during the procedure defined as eTICI 2b-3.
- 3. Meets the protocol-defined clinical stability criteria for the corresponding treatment pathway (see Section 4.3).
- 4. Unilateral limb motor dysfunction on the same side as the dominant hand.
- 5. Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score of 10 to 50 at T0.
- 6. Pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score <= 2.
- 7. Written informed consent provided by the participant and ability to comply with training and follow-up; if necessary, consent may be provided by a legally authorized representative.
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1. Imaging-confirmed symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), or bleeding risk considered unacceptable by the investigator and requiring a change in treatment strategy.
- 2. Overt progressive neurological deterioration or need for urgent intervention, making training inappropriate, such as an increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of >=4 from a prior assessment with cause not yet clarified or stabilized.
- 3. Severe disturbance of consciousness, severe aphasia or neglect, or significant cognitive impairment that would prevent completion of BCI training tasks or primary outcome assessment.
- 4. Bilateral significant motor impairment, such as brainstem or bilateral lesions, or pre-existing moderate-to-severe disability of the contralateral upper or lower limb, which would interfere with training or interpretation of assessments under the unilateral impairment framework.
- 5. Severe comorbidity or unstable vital signs, including but not limited to unstable arrhythmia, severe heart failure or respiratory failure, active severe infection or sepsis, or severe hepatic or renal failure, such that the investigator judges the participant unable to safely complete training and follow-up.
- 6. Severe scalp skin damage or infection, or any other condition preventing safe use of the EEG electrode cap.
- 7. Frequent seizures within 7 days before randomization, or seizure risk considered unacceptable by the investigator.
- 8. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- 9. Participation in another interventional clinical study that may affect the outcomes of this study, or any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the participant unsuitable for enrollment.
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Ingen (Open Label)
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: Experimental BCI Rehabilitation Group
Standard early rehabilitation plus early EEG-BCI dual-module virtual hand and gait training
|
Closed-loop EEG-based non-invasive brain-computer interface training added to standard early rehabilitation, including virtual hand training for the upper limb and gait/ankle dorsiflexion training for the lower limb.
Training is delivered twice daily, approximately 20 minutes per session, for 5 consecutive days.
Participants receive site-standard early rehabilitation according to the local rehabilitation protocol.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: Standard Early Rehabilitation Group
Standard early rehabilitation without additional BCI training.
|
Participants receive site-standard early rehabilitation according to the local rehabilitation protocol.
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score
Tidsramme: Baseline (T0), Day 30
|
Change is calculated as the Day 30 FMA-UE score minus the baseline (T0) FMA-UE score.
Higher positive values indicate greater improvement in upper-extremity motor function.
T0 is defined as 48 hours after IVT for the IVT-only pathway, and Day 5 (120 ± 24 hours) after MT for the MT ± IVT pathway.
|
Baseline (T0), Day 30
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score
Tidsramme: Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Upper-extremity motor impairment assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity.
Higher scores indicate better upper-extremity motor function.
|
Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
|
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) score
Tidsramme: Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Upper-limb activity limitation assessed using the Action Research Arm Test.
Higher scores indicate better upper-limb function.
|
Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) score
Tidsramme: Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Lower-extremity motor impairment assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Lower Extremity.
Higher scores indicate better lower-extremity motor function.
|
Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
|
Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) score
Tidsramme: Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Walking ability assessed using the Functional Ambulation Category.
Higher scores indicate greater independence in ambulation.
|
Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
|
10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) performance
Tidsramme: Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Walking performance assessed by the 10-Meter Walk Test in participants who meet prespecified walking criteria.
Walking speed and/or time required to complete the test will be recorded.
|
Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
|
Timed Up and Go (TUG) test performance
Tidsramme: Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Functional mobility assessed by the Timed Up and Go test in participants who meet prespecified walking criteria.
Time required to complete the test will be recorded.
|
Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
|
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score
Tidsramme: Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Neurological deficit severity assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.
Lower scores indicate less severe neurological impairment.
|
Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
|
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score
Tidsramme: Day 30, Day 90
|
Global disability assessed using the modified Rankin Scale.
Lower scores indicate less disability and greater functional independence.
|
Day 30, Day 90
|
|
Barthel Index (BI) / Modified Barthel Index (MBI) score
Tidsramme: Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Activities of daily living assessed using the Barthel Index or Modified Barthel Index, according to the scale used at each study site.
Higher scores indicate better functional independence in daily activities.
|
Day 10 (±2 days), Day 30, Day 90
|
Andre resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Screening-to-enrollment ratio
Tidsramme: Through completion of recruitment, an estimated 16 months
|
Feasibility outcome defined as the number of participants enrolled and randomized divided by the total number of participants screened.
|
Through completion of recruitment, an estimated 16 months
|
|
Intervention adherence rate
Tidsramme: During the 5-day intervention period
|
Feasibility outcome defined as the proportion of planned training sessions completed by each participant.
|
During the 5-day intervention period
|
|
Effective BCI training duration
Tidsramme: During the 5-day intervention period
|
Feasibility outcome defined as the cumulative duration of valid BCI training completed during the intervention period.
|
During the 5-day intervention period
|
|
EEG signal quality and classification accuracy
Tidsramme: During the 5-day intervention period
|
Feasibility outcome assessing the quality of EEG acquisition and the performance of signal classification during BCI training sessions.
|
During the 5-day intervention period
|
|
Follow-up completion rate
Tidsramme: Through Day 90
|
Feasibility outcome defined as the proportion of randomized participants who complete scheduled outcome assessments through Day 90.
|
Through Day 90
|
|
Protocol deviation rate
Tidsramme: From randomization through Day 90
|
Feasibility outcome defined as the proportion of participants with one or more protocol deviations.
|
From randomization through Day 90
|
|
Incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
Tidsramme: From T0 through Day 30
|
Safety outcome defined as the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after study enrollment.
|
From T0 through Day 30
|
|
Incidence of any intracranial hemorrhage
Tidsramme: From T0 through Day 30
|
Safety outcome defined as the occurrence of any type of intracranial hemorrhage after study enrollment.
|
From T0 through Day 30
|
|
Incidence of neurological deterioration
Tidsramme: From T0 through Day 30
|
Safety outcome defined as clinical neurological worsening after study enrollment according to the study protocol.
|
From T0 through Day 30
|
|
Incidence of seizures
Tidsramme: From T0 through Day 30
|
Safety outcome defined as the occurrence of seizure events after study enrollment.
|
From T0 through Day 30
|
|
Incidence of falls
Tidsramme: From T0 through Day 30
|
Safety outcome defined as the occurrence of falls during the study period.
|
From T0 through Day 30
|
|
Incidence of blood pressure or cardiac rhythm adverse events
Tidsramme: From T0 through Day 30
|
Safety outcome defined as blood pressure instability or cardiac arrhythmia events occurring during the study period.
|
From T0 through Day 30
|
|
Incidence of puncture-site bleeding or hematoma
Tidsramme: From T0 through Day 30
|
Safety outcome assessed in participants in the MT pathway, defined as puncture-site bleeding or hematoma after mechanical thrombectomy.
|
From T0 through Day 30
|
|
Incidence of training-related discomfort
Tidsramme: During the 5-day intervention period
|
Safety outcome defined as training-related discomfort, including fatigue, headache, skin irritation, or other reported discomfort associated with the intervention.
|
During the 5-day intervention period
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Sponsor
Etterforskere
- Hovedetterforsker: QinJian Sun, MD, Shandong Provincial Hospital
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Antatt)
Primær fullføring (Antatt)
Studiet fullført (Antatt)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
- RT-BCI-2026-0219
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
IPD-planbeskrivelse
IPD-delingstidsramme
Tilgangskriterier for IPD-deling
IPD-deling Støtteinformasjonstype
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SEVJE
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .