Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Efficacy of a Roller Device Facilitating Self-massage in the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis (EPIROLL)

25 mai 2026 mis à jour par: Puressentiel

Evaluation of the Analgesic and Functional Efficacy of a Roller Device Facilitating Self-massage in the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis

Tennis elbow, also known as lateral epicondylitis, is a pathology of the enthesis of tendons attaching near or directly on the lateral epicondyle of the humerus. Lateral epicondylitis is characterized by progressive pain localized on the outer edge of the elbow, reproduced by palpation, stretching, and/or isometric resistance contraction of the lateral epicondylar muscles. This pain may be accompanied by a deficit in muscle strength compared to the opposite side. The diagnosis is mainly clinical, although imaging tests may be considered in cases of doubt or if the pain persists despite appropriate therapeutic management. There is no specific treatment for tennis elbow that has been proven to be effective. However, starting treatment can speed up the return to sporting activities and prevent the condition from becoming chronic. This study aims to fill this gap by evaluating the effectiveness of a simple and natural treatment for the symptoms of tennis elbow: a roller equipped with a ball that facilitates self-massage with simultaneous diffusion of an essential oil-based emulsion.

Objective : To evaluate the analgesic and functional efficacy of a roller device that facilitates mechanical self-massage through the simultaneous diffusion of an emulsion composed mainly of essential oils in the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis.

Participants : Lateral epicondylitis lasting more than 3 months, isolated and confirmed by clinical examination and ultrasound, in subjects aged 18 years and older.

Procedures : Clinical examination to confirm the diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis (specific tests for pain on stretching and palpation, elimination of differential diagnoses), and ultrasound.

  • Assessment using the PRTEE (Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation) questionnaire (French version).
  • Assessment using the numerical pain rating scale (0-10),
  • Assessment of the location associated with the pain.
  • Treatment instructions: 2 daily applications, morning and evening, involving mechanical friction of the epicondylar and muscular area for 2 minutes, i.e., a total of 2 x 70 roller rotations (70 roller rotations on the tendon and 70 roller rotations on the muscle) for 3 months. The same parameters will be assessed one month, two months, and three months after use of the device. Patients will be randomized to receive either an Articulations & Muscles (AM) roller or a Control (T) roller.
  • Assessment of analgesic and anti-inflammatory consumption. Each participant will be given a daily monitoring diary to record their analgesic and anti-inflammatory intake.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

6.1 Type of Study

International multicenter interventional, single-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel-group study in centers with practitioners trained in diagnosis.

Randomization is achieved by dedicated software.

6.2 Primary Endpoint

  • Improvement in PRTEE questionnaire scores [10, 11, 12] before and after application of the Control roller (T) or the Joints & Muscles roller (AM) combined with simultaneous delivery of an emulsion composed notably of essential oils. An improvement of 20% [13] (minimum clinically significant threshold for epicondylitis) in the PRTEE score will be used as the success criterion.
  • Improvement of the score at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months.

6.3 Secondary Endpoints

  • Reduction in pain assessed by a numerical rating scale (0-10).
  • Reduction in analgesic and anti-inflammatory consumption.
  • Assessment of device tolerability.

6.4 Calculation of the number of participants

The primary endpoint is clinical response, defined as a ≥ 20% reduction in the PRTEE score from baseline. For each patient, the month in which the first response is observed is assessed - month 1, month 2, or month 3. If there is no response at these three time points, the patient remains included in the analysis. The model then takes into account the fact that the patient did not respond at three months and that their clinical progression beyond that point remains unknown.

Sample size:

The power of the Cox model was evaluated based on a simulation of a response 2 times faster in the active group (10%, 15%, and 20% reduction in score at 1, 2, and 3 months versus 5%, 7%, and 10% in the control group). With 40 and 30 patients per group, we obtain a power of 0.83 and 0.72 at the 0.05 level, respectively.

The following will therefore be included:

80 patients, randomly divided into two groups: Group 1: 40 patients with Control roller (T) Group 2: 40 patients with Joints and Muscles roller (AM) and essential oil-based solution

Consultation C1 (Baseline):

  • Provision of information and signing of informed consent (see Appendix 1 and 2).
  • Verification of inclusion and exclusion criteria.
  • Assessment via PRTEE questionnaire.
  • Assessment via numerical pain rating scale (0-10).
  • Assessment of pain location.
  • Provision of treatment instructions: 2 daily applications morning and evening by mechanical self-massage of the epicondylar and muscular area for 2 minutes, i.e. 2 × 70 roller passes in total (70 on the tendon and 70 on the muscle), for 3 months (an explanatory video provided via QR code in an appendix given to patients and assessors).
  • Assessment of analgesic and anti-inflammatory consumption. A daily monitoring diary will be given to each participant to record intake.
  • Provision of 3 Rollers.

Consultation C2 (1 month):

  • Assessment via PRTEE questionnaire.
  • Assessment via numerical pain rating scale (0-10).
  • Assessment of analgesic and anti-inflammatory consumption.
  • Provision of 3 Rollers.

Consultation C3 (2 months):

  • Assessment via PRTEE questionnaire.
  • Assessment via numerical pain rating scale (0-10).
  • Assessment of analgesic and anti-inflammatory consumption.
  • Provision of 3 Rollers.

Consultation C4 (3 months):

  • Assessment via PRTEE questionnaire.
  • Assessment via numerical pain rating scale (0-10).
  • Assessment of analgesic and anti-inflammatory consumption.
  • Provision of the numerical pain rating scale, in preparation for the telephone consultation.

Optional Telephone Consultation C5 (6 months):

  • Assessment via PRTEE questionnaire.
  • Assessment via numerical pain rating scale (0-10).

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

80

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:• Lateral epicondylitis of more than 3 months' duration, isolated and confirmed by clinical and ultrasonographic examination.

  • Failure of at least one prior rehabilitation treatment.
  • No ongoing physical treatment (shockwave therapy, physiotherapy) for at least 6 weeks, including a well-conducted rehabilitation.
  • Adults aged over 18 years.

Exclusion Criteria:• Manual workers in active employment conducive to lateral epicondylitis.

  • Occupational injury.
  • Patients who have received at least one treatment with PRP (platelet-rich plasma) or any other regenerative treatment.
  • Uncontrolled inflammatory or metabolic diseases.
  • Neuropsychological disorders preventing proper completion of the protocol.
  • Age under 18 years.
  • Person unable to understand French.
  • Associated osteoarticular and neurological pathologies of the upper limb.
  • Known allergy to any component of the essential oils used.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: active roller Puressentiel with essentiel oils
Automassage with the active roller Puressentiel
Active automassage with roller Puressentiel
automassage twice a day with a non active roller Puressentiel
To evaluate the analgesic and functional efficacy of a roller device that facilitates mechanical self-massage through the simultaneous diffusion of an emulsion composed mainly of essential oils in the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis.
Comparateur actif: Automassage with an empty roller Puressentiel
Active automassage with roller Puressentiel
automassage twice a day with a non active roller Puressentiel
To evaluate the analgesic and functional efficacy of a roller device that facilitates mechanical self-massage through the simultaneous diffusion of an emulsion composed mainly of essential oils in the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
PRTEE questionnaire (Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation)
Délai: Improvement of the score at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months
Change in Ptient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire scores before and after application of the Control roller (T) or the Joints & Muscles roller (AM) combined with simultaneous delivery of an emulsion composed notably of essential oils. The maximum score (worse) being 100 and the minimum sore (best) being 0. An improvement of 20% [13] (minimum clinically significant threshold for epicondylitis) in the PRTEE score will be used as the success criterion
Improvement of the score at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Pain assessed by a visual numerical rating scale
Délai: Improvement of the score at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months.
Reduction in pain assessed by a numerical rating scale (0-10), O being the best and 10 being the worse
Improvement of the score at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months.
Tolerance
Délai: Report at 1, 2 and 3 months
Report of side effects on a diary
Report at 1, 2 and 3 months

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 juin 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

28 mai 2028

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 septembre 2028

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

18 mai 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

25 mai 2026

Première publication (Réel)

29 mai 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

29 mai 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

25 mai 2026

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • Puressentiel 2025-A02179-40

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner