Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Efficacy of a Roller Device Facilitating Self-massage in the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis (EPIROLL)

25 maggio 2026 aggiornato da: Puressentiel

Evaluation of the Analgesic and Functional Efficacy of a Roller Device Facilitating Self-massage in the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis

Tennis elbow, also known as lateral epicondylitis, is a pathology of the enthesis of tendons attaching near or directly on the lateral epicondyle of the humerus. Lateral epicondylitis is characterized by progressive pain localized on the outer edge of the elbow, reproduced by palpation, stretching, and/or isometric resistance contraction of the lateral epicondylar muscles. This pain may be accompanied by a deficit in muscle strength compared to the opposite side. The diagnosis is mainly clinical, although imaging tests may be considered in cases of doubt or if the pain persists despite appropriate therapeutic management. There is no specific treatment for tennis elbow that has been proven to be effective. However, starting treatment can speed up the return to sporting activities and prevent the condition from becoming chronic. This study aims to fill this gap by evaluating the effectiveness of a simple and natural treatment for the symptoms of tennis elbow: a roller equipped with a ball that facilitates self-massage with simultaneous diffusion of an essential oil-based emulsion.

Objective : To evaluate the analgesic and functional efficacy of a roller device that facilitates mechanical self-massage through the simultaneous diffusion of an emulsion composed mainly of essential oils in the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis.

Participants : Lateral epicondylitis lasting more than 3 months, isolated and confirmed by clinical examination and ultrasound, in subjects aged 18 years and older.

Procedures : Clinical examination to confirm the diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis (specific tests for pain on stretching and palpation, elimination of differential diagnoses), and ultrasound.

  • Assessment using the PRTEE (Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation) questionnaire (French version).
  • Assessment using the numerical pain rating scale (0-10),
  • Assessment of the location associated with the pain.
  • Treatment instructions: 2 daily applications, morning and evening, involving mechanical friction of the epicondylar and muscular area for 2 minutes, i.e., a total of 2 x 70 roller rotations (70 roller rotations on the tendon and 70 roller rotations on the muscle) for 3 months. The same parameters will be assessed one month, two months, and three months after use of the device. Patients will be randomized to receive either an Articulations & Muscles (AM) roller or a Control (T) roller.
  • Assessment of analgesic and anti-inflammatory consumption. Each participant will be given a daily monitoring diary to record their analgesic and anti-inflammatory intake.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

6.1 Type of Study

International multicenter interventional, single-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel-group study in centers with practitioners trained in diagnosis.

Randomization is achieved by dedicated software.

6.2 Primary Endpoint

  • Improvement in PRTEE questionnaire scores [10, 11, 12] before and after application of the Control roller (T) or the Joints & Muscles roller (AM) combined with simultaneous delivery of an emulsion composed notably of essential oils. An improvement of 20% [13] (minimum clinically significant threshold for epicondylitis) in the PRTEE score will be used as the success criterion.
  • Improvement of the score at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months.

6.3 Secondary Endpoints

  • Reduction in pain assessed by a numerical rating scale (0-10).
  • Reduction in analgesic and anti-inflammatory consumption.
  • Assessment of device tolerability.

6.4 Calculation of the number of participants

The primary endpoint is clinical response, defined as a ≥ 20% reduction in the PRTEE score from baseline. For each patient, the month in which the first response is observed is assessed - month 1, month 2, or month 3. If there is no response at these three time points, the patient remains included in the analysis. The model then takes into account the fact that the patient did not respond at three months and that their clinical progression beyond that point remains unknown.

Sample size:

The power of the Cox model was evaluated based on a simulation of a response 2 times faster in the active group (10%, 15%, and 20% reduction in score at 1, 2, and 3 months versus 5%, 7%, and 10% in the control group). With 40 and 30 patients per group, we obtain a power of 0.83 and 0.72 at the 0.05 level, respectively.

The following will therefore be included:

80 patients, randomly divided into two groups: Group 1: 40 patients with Control roller (T) Group 2: 40 patients with Joints and Muscles roller (AM) and essential oil-based solution

Consultation C1 (Baseline):

  • Provision of information and signing of informed consent (see Appendix 1 and 2).
  • Verification of inclusion and exclusion criteria.
  • Assessment via PRTEE questionnaire.
  • Assessment via numerical pain rating scale (0-10).
  • Assessment of pain location.
  • Provision of treatment instructions: 2 daily applications morning and evening by mechanical self-massage of the epicondylar and muscular area for 2 minutes, i.e. 2 × 70 roller passes in total (70 on the tendon and 70 on the muscle), for 3 months (an explanatory video provided via QR code in an appendix given to patients and assessors).
  • Assessment of analgesic and anti-inflammatory consumption. A daily monitoring diary will be given to each participant to record intake.
  • Provision of 3 Rollers.

Consultation C2 (1 month):

  • Assessment via PRTEE questionnaire.
  • Assessment via numerical pain rating scale (0-10).
  • Assessment of analgesic and anti-inflammatory consumption.
  • Provision of 3 Rollers.

Consultation C3 (2 months):

  • Assessment via PRTEE questionnaire.
  • Assessment via numerical pain rating scale (0-10).
  • Assessment of analgesic and anti-inflammatory consumption.
  • Provision of 3 Rollers.

Consultation C4 (3 months):

  • Assessment via PRTEE questionnaire.
  • Assessment via numerical pain rating scale (0-10).
  • Assessment of analgesic and anti-inflammatory consumption.
  • Provision of the numerical pain rating scale, in preparation for the telephone consultation.

Optional Telephone Consultation C5 (6 months):

  • Assessment via PRTEE questionnaire.
  • Assessment via numerical pain rating scale (0-10).

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

80

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:• Lateral epicondylitis of more than 3 months' duration, isolated and confirmed by clinical and ultrasonographic examination.

  • Failure of at least one prior rehabilitation treatment.
  • No ongoing physical treatment (shockwave therapy, physiotherapy) for at least 6 weeks, including a well-conducted rehabilitation.
  • Adults aged over 18 years.

Exclusion Criteria:• Manual workers in active employment conducive to lateral epicondylitis.

  • Occupational injury.
  • Patients who have received at least one treatment with PRP (platelet-rich plasma) or any other regenerative treatment.
  • Uncontrolled inflammatory or metabolic diseases.
  • Neuropsychological disorders preventing proper completion of the protocol.
  • Age under 18 years.
  • Person unable to understand French.
  • Associated osteoarticular and neurological pathologies of the upper limb.
  • Known allergy to any component of the essential oils used.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Comparatore attivo: active roller Puressentiel with essentiel oils
Automassage with the active roller Puressentiel
Active automassage with roller Puressentiel
automassage twice a day with a non active roller Puressentiel
To evaluate the analgesic and functional efficacy of a roller device that facilitates mechanical self-massage through the simultaneous diffusion of an emulsion composed mainly of essential oils in the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis.
Comparatore attivo: Automassage with an empty roller Puressentiel
Active automassage with roller Puressentiel
automassage twice a day with a non active roller Puressentiel
To evaluate the analgesic and functional efficacy of a roller device that facilitates mechanical self-massage through the simultaneous diffusion of an emulsion composed mainly of essential oils in the treatment of chronic lateral epicondylitis.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
PRTEE questionnaire (Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation)
Lasso di tempo: Improvement of the score at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months
Change in Ptient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire scores before and after application of the Control roller (T) or the Joints & Muscles roller (AM) combined with simultaneous delivery of an emulsion composed notably of essential oils. The maximum score (worse) being 100 and the minimum sore (best) being 0. An improvement of 20% [13] (minimum clinically significant threshold for epicondylitis) in the PRTEE score will be used as the success criterion
Improvement of the score at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Pain assessed by a visual numerical rating scale
Lasso di tempo: Improvement of the score at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months.
Reduction in pain assessed by a numerical rating scale (0-10), O being the best and 10 being the worse
Improvement of the score at 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months.
Tolerance
Lasso di tempo: Report at 1, 2 and 3 months
Report of side effects on a diary
Report at 1, 2 and 3 months

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 giugno 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

28 maggio 2028

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 settembre 2028

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

18 maggio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

25 maggio 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

29 maggio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

29 maggio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

25 maggio 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 maggio 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • Puressentiel 2025-A02179-40

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Active comparator

Sottoscrivi