Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Early Diagnostic Telehealth Pilot for Moderate- and High-Risk Children: Evaluating Assessment Protocols and Efficiency in Georgia's Early Intervention Program

29 mai 2026 mis à jour par: Allison Schwartz, Emory University

Early Diagnostic Telehealth Pilot for Moderate- and High-risk Children: Evaluating Protocols for Children in Georgia's Early Intervention Program

This pilot study includes children identified as moderate- as well as high-risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) within Georgia's Babies Can't Wait (BCW) Early Intervention (EI) program. The project will evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and implementation of a diagnostic protocol, including optional measures, through measures of recruitment, retention, adherence, provider confidence, and time from referral to report completion. It will also examine which child diagnostic measures are essential and needed to improve psychologists' diagnostic confidence. Caregiver, early intervention provider, and clinician experiences and satisfaction before, during, and after assessment will be assessed to evaluate protocol acceptability, knowledge, and access to services. Outcomes will be analyzed using the RE-AIM Framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance) and compared across BCW districts and child characteristics, including changes in autism screening, referral, and evaluation rates over time.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Description détaillée

The objective of this study is to develop, pilot, and evaluate a telehealth diagnostic protocol for assessing toddlers identified as moderate- or high-risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) within Georgia's Babies Can't Wait (BCW) Early Intervention (EI) program.

Many BCW children with moderate- or high-risk screening results face long wait times and limited access to diagnostic evaluations. This pilot will evaluate how many of these assessments can be completed entirely via a streamlined telehealth protocol and the level of diagnostic confidence achieved. It is hypothesized that the EDRM-E will increase access to timely, evidence-based autism evaluations and yield diagnostic outcomes comparable to in-person assessments based on DSM-5-TR criteria.

Secondary aims include identifying which additional assessment measures increase clinician confidence and are most acceptable to families and providers. It is hypothesized that moderate-risk children will require more in-depth evaluation and that families receiving expanded assessments will report higher satisfaction and acceptability.

A further objective is to examine family, BCW provider, and clinician satisfaction, understanding, and access to services following participation in the EDRM-E pilot. No data will be submitted to the FDA, and no algorithm, product, or software will be commercialized or used outside Emory.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

100

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Child is enrolled in a participating BCW district.
  • Child is 16-36 months of age at the time of referral.
  • Child is identified as moderate- or high-risk on the M-CHAT-R/F
  • BCW provider submits a referral to the EDRM-E pilot by 33 months of age.
  • Parent/guardian has basic English proficiency in order to complete intake forms and in-depth interview, and the child has exposure to English at home or in out-of-home care.
  • Documentation of the M-CHAT-R/F screening results and parental consent to refer is completed and submitted.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Families making self-referrals to the EAC or referred from non-onboarded BCW districts.
  • Child is older than 33 months at referral.
  • Non-English speaking families due to staffing and resource limitations as the consent, parent interview and child assessment would need to be done and accessible in other languages and are not available within this study scope at this time. .

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Diagnostique
  • Répartition: N / A
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Families with children enrolled in BCW with suspected diagnosis of autism
Post-consent, families with children between 16-33 months will receive a link to complete the EAC Developmental History Survey on REDCap and a link to complete parent/caregiver questionnaires about developmental and/or adaptive information. Children will be assessed via a remote telehealth session with an EAC clinician, using age-appropriate standardized measures. Clinicians rate confidence after four points: intake review, parent interview and child observation, child assessment, and DSM-5-TR checklist completion. Feedback is provided via telehealth, and a final report with recommendations is issued. Psychologists will be asked about the protocol after each assessment. Parents/caregivers will be asked to answer questions during the assessment, immediately after the assessment, and 3 months later. EI providers will also be asked questions about their experience after the assessment. Total length of enrollment range 3-16 weeks.
A telehealth diagnostic protocol for assessing toddlers identified as moderate- or high-risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) within Georgia's Babies Can't Wait (BCW) Early Intervention (EI) program. This pilot will evaluate how many of the initial assessments can be completed entirely via a streamlined telehealth protocol and the level of diagnostic confidence achieved.
Autres noms:
  • EDRM-E

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Number of moderate and high-risk referral assessments that were completed entirely via a streamlined telehealth protocol
Délai: Monthly until the end of the study (approximately one year)
Number of moderate and high-risk referral assessments that can be completed entirely via streamlined telehealth protocol
Monthly until the end of the study (approximately one year)
Number of participants referred to the Early Diagnostic Response Model Expanded (EDRM-E)
Délai: End of study (up to 16 weeks post-intervention)
Monthly numbers of high-risk referrals to the EDRM-E pilot project and total number of referrals made to the EDRM-E at the end of the study.
End of study (up to 16 weeks post-intervention)
Number of participants consented in the Early Diagnostic Response Model Expanded (EDRM-E) study
Délai: Monthly until the end of the study (approximately one year)
Monthly number of families referred who consent to EDRM-E participation
Monthly until the end of the study (approximately one year)
Response rate in the Early Diagnostic Response Model Expanded (EDRM-E) study
Délai: Monthly until the end of the study (approximately one year)
Response rate will be calculated at project end using the formula [# of families who consented / # of families referred to project] x 100 = response rate)
Monthly until the end of the study (approximately one year)
Number of participants that completed the Early Diagnostic Response Model Expanded (EDRM-E) study
Délai: Every 3 months (Quarterly) until end of study (approximately one year)
Quarterly numbers of participants that completed the EDRM-E assessment protocol and total number of participants who completed EDRM-E assessment protocol at study conclusion
Every 3 months (Quarterly) until end of study (approximately one year)
Time from referral to completion of the program
Délai: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention

Individual calculation of time from BCW referral to final summary report sent to family using the formula:

Date of Final Report sent to family - Date of referral from BCW =Time in EDRM-E pilot

Up to 12 weeks post-intervention

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Nombre de participants avec des informations supplémentaires collectées pour tirer une conclusion finale du DSM-5
Délai: Tous les 3 mois (Trimestriel) jusqu'à la fin de l'étude (environ un an), Jusqu'à 12 semaines après l'intervention
Nombre de participants avec des informations supplémentaires collectées pour tirer une conclusion finale du DSM-5
Tous les 3 mois (Trimestriel) jusqu'à la fin de l'étude (environ un an), Jusqu'à 12 semaines après l'intervention
Nombre de familles qui ont reçu une évaluation des TSA à la fin de l'étude via le projet pilote par rapport à d'autres moyens
Délai: À la fin des études, en moyenne 1 an
Nombre de familles qui ont reçu une évaluation des TSA à la fin de l'étude via le projet pilote par rapport à d'autres moyens
À la fin des études, en moyenne 1 an
Number of moderate and high-risk referrals by BCW district
Délai: Every 3 months (Quarterly) until end of study (approximately one year), Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
Number of moderate-high risk referral assessments by specific BCW district. Monthly, Quarterly, and Total numbers of participants who completed EDRM-E pilot assessment.
Every 3 months (Quarterly) until end of study (approximately one year), Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
Number of moderate and high-risk referral by child factors
Délai: Every 3 months (Quarterly) until end of study (approximately one year), Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
Number of high-risk referral assessments by child factors. Monthly, Quarterly, and Total numbers of participants who completed EDRM-E pilot assessment.
Every 3 months (Quarterly) until end of study (approximately one year), Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
Number of moderate and high-risk referrals by clinician setting
Délai: Every 3 months (Quarterly) until end of study (approximately one year), Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
Number of high-risk referral assessments by clinician setting. Monthly, Quarterly, and Total numbers of participants who completed EDRM-E pilot assessment.
Every 3 months (Quarterly) until end of study (approximately one year), Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
Parent satisfaction of EDRM-E assessment survey
Délai: At completion of EDRM-E assessment (4 weeks post-intervention)
Administered at the end of individual EDRM-E assessment. Satisfaction surveys will use a Likert-scale of 1-5 with 1 being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree as well as 0 being not applicable/unknown. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with specific aspect of EDRM project. Total score: 0 to 110.
At completion of EDRM-E assessment (4 weeks post-intervention)
BCW provider(s) Service Coordinator satisfaction with EDRM-E assessment survey
Délai: At completion of EDRM-E assessment (4 weeks post-intervention)
Administered at end of individual EDRM-E assessment. Satisfaction surveys will use a Likert-scale of 1-5 with 1 being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree as well as 0 being not applicable/unknown. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with specific aspect of EDRM-E project.
At completion of EDRM-E assessment (4 weeks post-intervention)
Parent satisfaction with access to treatment survey
Délai: 3 months after completion of EDRM-E assessment
Parent satisfaction with access to treatment survey Administered 3-months after completion of EDRM-E assessment. Satisfaction surveys will use a Likert-scale of 1-5 with 1 being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree as well as 0 being not applicable/unknown. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with specific aspect of EDRM-E project. Total score: 0 to 15.
3 months after completion of EDRM-E assessment
BCW provider(s) Early Intervention Coordinator satisfaction with EDRM-E pilot survey
Délai: Every 3 months (Quarterly) until end of study (approximately one year), Up to 12 weeks postintervention
Completed every 3 months (Quarterly). Satisfaction surveys will use a Likert-scale of 1-5 with 1 being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree as well as 0 being not applicable/unknown. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with specific aspect of EDRM project. Total score: 0 to 55
Every 3 months (Quarterly) until end of study (approximately one year), Up to 12 weeks postintervention
Number of families screened moderate and high-risk for ASD and referred for an evaluation
Délai: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Number of families screened moderate and high-risk for ASD and referred for an evaluation
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Allison J Schwartz, PhD, Emory University

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 juin 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 juin 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 juin 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

29 mai 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

29 mai 2026

Première publication (Réel)

3 juin 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

3 juin 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

29 mai 2026

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

Data will be shared with qualified researchers with relevant expertise, researchers affiliated with academic or clinical institutions, and investigators with IRB/ethics approval for secondary analyses as needed, including basic demographic information, scores on assessments, and final diagnostic results.

Délai de partage IPD

Proposals may be submitted to up to 3 years following article publication. After 3 years, data will be provided in Emory University's data warehouse but without investigator support other than deposited materials.

Critères d'accès au partage IPD

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal that has been approved by an IRB. To achieve aims in proposed activity and/or for meta-analysis of telehealth assessments.

Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD

  • PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
  • SÈVE
  • CIF

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur Early Diagnostic Response Model Expanded

S'abonner