Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

A Study on the Consistency Evaluation of Digital PCR Technology for Quantitative Detection of HBV Nucleic Acid

3 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Minghui Li, Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals

A Study on the Consistency Evaluation of Digital PCR Technology for Quantitative Detection of Hepatitis B Virus Nucleic Acid

The research plan aims to evaluate the consistency of the digital PCR-based hepatitis B virus nucleic acid quantification technique with the existing Roche qPCR-based detection method. Approximately 200 samples of residual serum from patients with chronic hepatitis B, covering high, medium, low, and those below the Roche lower limit concentration or undetectable, will be collected. The two methods will be used for parallel testing. The main objective is to evaluate the quantitative consistency of the two methods within the quantifiable range of Roche (≥ 20 IU/mL); the secondary objectives include evaluating the qualitative detection rate of samples with concentrations below 20 IU/mL or undetectable nucleic acid.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

The study aims to include a total sample size of approximately 200 cases: 100 positive cases: ≥ 1000 IU/mL: 40 cases; 100 - 1000 IU/mL: 30 cases; 20 - 100 IU/mL: 30 cases; 100 negative cases: lower than 20 IU/mL: 40 cases, and undetected: 60 cases. Collect the age, gender, duration of HBV infection, antiviral treatment drugs and treatment courses, HBeAg status, HBsAg quantification (if available), ALT/AST levels, date of blood sample collection, date and result of combas HBV DNA detection, and digital PCR detection results of the enrolled patients. By comparing the detection results of the two methods, evaluate the quantitative accuracy or qualitative detection ability of the digital PCR hepatitis B detection method.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Estimé)

200

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

  • Chine
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Chine, 100015
        • Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon de probabilité

Population étudiée

The research samples were derived from the routine diagnostic leftover serum samples of chronic hepatitis B patients who were treated at the outpatient or inpatient departments of Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University. All the samples were the leftover samples obtained after the routine HBV DNA testing (combas HBV) was completed, and they were the secondary utilization of the leftover samples from clinical routine tests.

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who have been diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B (in accordance with the diagnostic criteria of the "Chronic Hepatitis B Prevention and Treatment Guidelines (2022 Edition)") and are currently receiving NAs antiviral treatment for ≥ 6 months or have not received treatment and are ≥ 18 years old;
  2. Remaining samples (serum) that have undergone combas HBV DNA testing and have clear test results, with the sample collection time frozen for ≤ 6 months;
  3. The remaining sample volume is sufficient (≥ 1.0 mL), sufficient for digital PCR testing and necessary duplicate testing;
  4. Samples from the same patient at different time points can be included as independent samples, but the sampling interval time needs to be recorded.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Combine other liver virus infections such as HCV, HDV or HIV;
  2. Poor sample quality, such as severe hemolysis, lipemia or repeated freezing and thawing ≥ 3 times;
  3. The samples were not properly frozen and stored (-80℃) after collection or the temperature records were missing;
  4. The clinical information is severely lacking, making it impossible to confirm the diagnosis and treatment status;
  5. The duplicate samples already included at the same time point (only the first included sample is retained).

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
Intervention / Traitement
High-concentration group
After detection using digital PCR technology, the results were classified according to concentration levels as follows: high concentration group (≥ 1000 IU/mL); medium concentration group (100 - 1000 IU/mL); low concentration group (20 - 100 IU/mL); extremely low concentration group (below 20 IU/mL); undetectable group.
Autre: the results were classified according to concentration levels
the results were classified according to concentration levels
medium concentration group
After detection using digital PCR technology, the results were classified according to concentration levels as follows: high concentration group (≥ 1000 IU/mL); medium concentration group (100 - 1000 IU/mL); low concentration group (20 - 100 IU/mL); extremely low concentration group (below 20 IU/mL); undetectable group.
Autre: the results were classified according to concentration levels
the results were classified according to concentration levels
low concentration group
After detection using digital PCR technology, the results were classified according to concentration levels as follows: high concentration group (≥ 1000 IU/mL); medium concentration group (100 - 1000 IU/mL); low concentration group (20 - 100 IU/mL); extremely low concentration group (below 20 IU/mL); undetectable group.
Autre: the results were classified according to concentration levels
the results were classified according to concentration levels
extremely low concentration group
After detection using digital PCR technology, the results were classified according to concentration levels as follows: high concentration group (≥ 1000 IU/mL); medium concentration group (100 - 1000 IU/mL); low concentration group (20 - 100 IU/mL); extremely low concentration group (below 20 IU/mL); undetectable group.
Autre: the results were classified according to concentration levels
the results were classified according to concentration levels
undetectable group
After detection using digital PCR technology, the results were classified according to concentration levels as follows: high concentration group (≥ 1000 IU/mL); medium concentration group (100 - 1000 IU/mL); low concentration group (20 - 100 IU/mL); extremely low concentration group (below 20 IU/mL); undetectable group.
Autre: the results were classified according to concentration levels
the results were classified according to concentration levels

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
quantitative consistency
Délai: "Baseline, single cross-sectional testing at sample collection, through study completion"
Evaluate the quantitative consistency of the self-developed digital PCR (ddPCR) method with the Roche Cobas TaqMan HBV DNA test (cobas HBV) within the quantifiable range (≥ 20 IU/mL)
"Baseline, single cross-sectional testing at sample collection, through study completion"

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 août 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 août 2028

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 août 2028

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

29 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

29 juin 2026

Première publication (Réel)

6 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

7 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

3 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • DTEC-KY2026-075-01

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner