Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Animation-Based Orotracheal Suction Training for Expert Nurses (ABOST-EN)

30 juin 2026 mis à jour par: Makbule YILMAZ, Bartın Unıversity

Effect of Animation-Based Orotracheal Suction Training on Clinical Reasoning Competency and Knowledge Level of Expert Nurses: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the effect of animation-based orotracheal suction training on the clinical reasoning competency and knowledge levels of expert pediatric nurses. Orotracheal suctioning is a complex and invasive nursing procedure requiring advanced clinical reasoning, rapid decision-making, and patient safety awareness. Although digital learning approaches are increasingly used in nursing education, evidence regarding their effectiveness among expert nurses remains limited.

A total of 66 pediatric nurses with at least five years of clinical experience and classified as expert nurses according to Patricia Benner's Novice-to-Expert Model were randomly assigned to either an intervention group receiving animation-based mobile training or a control group receiving PowerPoint-supported traditional training. Clinical reasoning competency and knowledge regarding orotracheal suctioning were assessed before and after the educational intervention.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Background:

Orotracheal suctioning is an essential but invasive nursing intervention frequently performed in pediatric clinical settings. Safe and effective implementation of this procedure requires advanced clinical reasoning skills, prioritization, rapid decision-making, and patient safety awareness. Expert nurses are expected to integrate experiential knowledge and clinical judgment during such complex procedures. However, traditional in-service educational approaches may not sufficiently support the development of clinical reasoning competencies.

Animation-based educational technologies provide opportunities for repeated observation, visualization of procedural steps, and reinforcement of clinical decision-making processes. Despite increasing interest in digital educational approaches, evidence regarding their effectiveness among expert nurses remains limited.

Objective:

This study aimed to examine the effect of animation-based orotracheal suction training on expert nurses' clinical reasoning competency and knowledge regarding orotracheal suctioning.

Methods:

This study was designed as a single-blind, parallel-group, pretest-posttest randomized controlled trial. The study was conducted between January and April 2026 in pediatric clinics of a city hospital in Istanbul, Türkiye.

Participants were pediatric nurses with at least five years of clinical nursing experience who met the expert-level criteria defined by Patricia Benner's Novice-to-Expert Model. Participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (animation-based mobile training) or the control group (PowerPoint-supported traditional training).

Data were collected using a Descriptive Characteristics Form, the Orotracheal Suction Knowledge Test, and the Clinical Reasoning Competency Scale for Nurses. Outcomes were evaluated before and after the intervention.

Primary Outcome:

Clinical reasoning competency measured by the Clinical Reasoning Competency Scale for Nurses.

Secondary Outcome:

Knowledge regarding orotracheal suctioning measured using the Orotracheal Suction Knowledge Test.

Significance:

The findings of this study are expected to contribute to the development of innovative, technology-enhanced educational strategies aimed at strengthening clinical reasoning, decision-making, and patient safety among expert nurses.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

66

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

      • Istanbul, Turquie (Türkiye), 34083
        • Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Registered nurses working in pediatric clinics.
  • Having at least five years of clinical nursing experience.
  • Meeting expert-level criteria according to Patricia Benner's Novice-to-Expert Model.
  • Willing to participate voluntarily in the study.
  • Providing written informed consent.
  • Having access to a smartphone or mobile device to access the educational materials.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having less than five years of clinical nursing experience.
  • Being on leave or absent during the study period.
  • Failing to complete the educational intervention or posttest assessments.
  • Withdrawing from the study at any stage.
  • Submitting incomplete questionnaires.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Autre
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Animation-Based Training Group
Participants in this group received animation-based orotracheal suction training delivered through QR code-enabled mobile access. The educational intervention included animated visualization of procedural steps and clinical decision-making processes related to pediatric orotracheal suctioning.
A mobile-supported animation-based educational intervention designed to improve expert nurses' clinical reasoning competency and knowledge regarding pediatric orotracheal suctioning. Participants accessed the educational content through QR code-enabled mobile devices.
Autre: Traditional Training Group
Participants in this group received PowerPoint-supported traditional training on pediatric orotracheal suctioning delivered through conventional face-to-face educational methods.
Traditional educational training delivered using PowerPoint presentations covering pediatric orotracheal suctioning procedures and related theoretical content.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Clinical Reasoning Competency
Délai: Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention (approximately 2 weeks)
Clinical reasoning competency will be assessed using the Clinical Reasoning Competency Scale for Nurses. Higher scores indicate higher levels of clinical reasoning competency.
Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention (approximately 2 weeks)

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Orotracheal Suction Knowledge Level
Délai: Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention (approximately 2 weeks)
Knowledge regarding pediatric orotracheal suctioning will be assessed using the Orotracheal Suction Knowledge Test. Higher scores indicate greater knowledge regarding evidence-based orotracheal suction practices.
Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention (approximately 2 weeks)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 janvier 2026

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

30 avril 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

30 avril 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

30 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

30 juin 2026

Première publication (Réel)

7 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

7 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

30 juin 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juin 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in this study will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Data will be available beginning 6 months and ending 5 years following publication. Requests will be reviewed by the principal investigator, and access will be granted for scientifically sound research purposes after approval and signing of a data access agreement.

Délai de partage IPD

Individual participant data and supporting materials will be available beginning 6 months following publication and ending 5 years after publication.

Critères d'accès au partage IPD

De-identified individual participant data, study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and analytic code will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for achieving the aims of the approved proposal. Access will be granted after review and approval by the principal investigator and completion of a data access agreement.

Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD

  • PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
  • SÈVE
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner