Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Animation-Based Orotracheal Suction Training for Expert Nurses (ABOST-EN)

30 de junho de 2026 atualizado por: Makbule YILMAZ, Bartın Unıversity

Effect of Animation-Based Orotracheal Suction Training on Clinical Reasoning Competency and Knowledge Level of Expert Nurses: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the effect of animation-based orotracheal suction training on the clinical reasoning competency and knowledge levels of expert pediatric nurses. Orotracheal suctioning is a complex and invasive nursing procedure requiring advanced clinical reasoning, rapid decision-making, and patient safety awareness. Although digital learning approaches are increasingly used in nursing education, evidence regarding their effectiveness among expert nurses remains limited.

A total of 66 pediatric nurses with at least five years of clinical experience and classified as expert nurses according to Patricia Benner's Novice-to-Expert Model were randomly assigned to either an intervention group receiving animation-based mobile training or a control group receiving PowerPoint-supported traditional training. Clinical reasoning competency and knowledge regarding orotracheal suctioning were assessed before and after the educational intervention.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Background:

Orotracheal suctioning is an essential but invasive nursing intervention frequently performed in pediatric clinical settings. Safe and effective implementation of this procedure requires advanced clinical reasoning skills, prioritization, rapid decision-making, and patient safety awareness. Expert nurses are expected to integrate experiential knowledge and clinical judgment during such complex procedures. However, traditional in-service educational approaches may not sufficiently support the development of clinical reasoning competencies.

Animation-based educational technologies provide opportunities for repeated observation, visualization of procedural steps, and reinforcement of clinical decision-making processes. Despite increasing interest in digital educational approaches, evidence regarding their effectiveness among expert nurses remains limited.

Objective:

This study aimed to examine the effect of animation-based orotracheal suction training on expert nurses' clinical reasoning competency and knowledge regarding orotracheal suctioning.

Methods:

This study was designed as a single-blind, parallel-group, pretest-posttest randomized controlled trial. The study was conducted between January and April 2026 in pediatric clinics of a city hospital in Istanbul, Türkiye.

Participants were pediatric nurses with at least five years of clinical nursing experience who met the expert-level criteria defined by Patricia Benner's Novice-to-Expert Model. Participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (animation-based mobile training) or the control group (PowerPoint-supported traditional training).

Data were collected using a Descriptive Characteristics Form, the Orotracheal Suction Knowledge Test, and the Clinical Reasoning Competency Scale for Nurses. Outcomes were evaluated before and after the intervention.

Primary Outcome:

Clinical reasoning competency measured by the Clinical Reasoning Competency Scale for Nurses.

Secondary Outcome:

Knowledge regarding orotracheal suctioning measured using the Orotracheal Suction Knowledge Test.

Significance:

The findings of this study are expected to contribute to the development of innovative, technology-enhanced educational strategies aimed at strengthening clinical reasoning, decision-making, and patient safety among expert nurses.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

66

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

      • Istanbul, Turquia (Türkiye), 34083
        • Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Registered nurses working in pediatric clinics.
  • Having at least five years of clinical nursing experience.
  • Meeting expert-level criteria according to Patricia Benner's Novice-to-Expert Model.
  • Willing to participate voluntarily in the study.
  • Providing written informed consent.
  • Having access to a smartphone or mobile device to access the educational materials.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having less than five years of clinical nursing experience.
  • Being on leave or absent during the study period.
  • Failing to complete the educational intervention or posttest assessments.
  • Withdrawing from the study at any stage.
  • Submitting incomplete questionnaires.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Outro
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Animation-Based Training Group
Participants in this group received animation-based orotracheal suction training delivered through QR code-enabled mobile access. The educational intervention included animated visualization of procedural steps and clinical decision-making processes related to pediatric orotracheal suctioning.
A mobile-supported animation-based educational intervention designed to improve expert nurses' clinical reasoning competency and knowledge regarding pediatric orotracheal suctioning. Participants accessed the educational content through QR code-enabled mobile devices.
Outro: Traditional Training Group
Participants in this group received PowerPoint-supported traditional training on pediatric orotracheal suctioning delivered through conventional face-to-face educational methods.
Traditional educational training delivered using PowerPoint presentations covering pediatric orotracheal suctioning procedures and related theoretical content.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Clinical Reasoning Competency
Prazo: Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention (approximately 2 weeks)
Clinical reasoning competency will be assessed using the Clinical Reasoning Competency Scale for Nurses. Higher scores indicate higher levels of clinical reasoning competency.
Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention (approximately 2 weeks)

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Orotracheal Suction Knowledge Level
Prazo: Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention (approximately 2 weeks)
Knowledge regarding pediatric orotracheal suctioning will be assessed using the Orotracheal Suction Knowledge Test. Higher scores indicate greater knowledge regarding evidence-based orotracheal suction practices.
Baseline and immediately after completion of the educational intervention (approximately 2 weeks)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

1 de janeiro de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Real)

30 de abril de 2026

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

30 de abril de 2026

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

30 de junho de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

30 de junho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

7 de julho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

7 de julho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

30 de junho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de junho de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

SIM

Descrição do plano IPD

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in this study will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Data will be available beginning 6 months and ending 5 years following publication. Requests will be reviewed by the principal investigator, and access will be granted for scientifically sound research purposes after approval and signing of a data access agreement.

Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD

Individual participant data and supporting materials will be available beginning 6 months following publication and ending 5 years after publication.

Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD

De-identified individual participant data, study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and analytic code will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for achieving the aims of the approved proposal. Access will be granted after review and approval by the principal investigator and completion of a data access agreement.

Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
  • SEIVA
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever