Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Predictors of Epidural Depth in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Model Development

13 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Hongbo Zheng, Tongji Hospital

Analysis of Factors Influencing Epidural Depth in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Development of a Predictive Model

Accurate estimation of epidural depth is critical for safe epidural anesthesia during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Although various imaging modalities can predict epidural depth, they increase healthcare burden and are not always feasible in emergency or bedside settings. Identifying simple, easily obtainable clinical parameters-such as sex, age, and body mass index (BMI)-for predicting epidural depth has become a research priority. However, systematic investigations specifically targeting the Chinese population remain scarce. This retrospective study aims to identify independent factors influencing epidural depth in PCNL patients and to develop simple, level-specific predictive models for different puncture sites, thereby providing a practical reference for clinical epidural anesthesia.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Description détaillée

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard minimally invasive surgical procedure for removal of kidney stones larger than 2 cm and is established as the gold standard for the management of complex renal calculi. This procedure may be performed under either general anesthesia or regional anesthesia, including epidural or spinal anesthesia. Accumulating meta-analyses have demonstrated that, compared with general anesthesia, regional anesthesia is associated with reduced postoperative pain scores and lower total hospital costs, without compromising the stone-free rate. Furthermore, in awake patients undergoing regional anesthesia, respiratory movements may generate a so-called "respiratory-synchronous stone fragmentation effect," which facilitates the expulsion of stone debris.

Successful epidural anesthesia relies critically on accurate identification of the epidural space and precise control of puncture depth. Insufficient puncture depth may result in improper catheter placement and subsequent block failure, whereas excessive puncture depth increases the risk of dural puncture, leading to cerebrospinal fluid leakage and post-dural puncture headache. In severe cases, inadvertent injection of a large dose of local anesthetics into the subarachnoid space can cause life-threatening cardiovascular and respiratory depression. Therefore, preprocedural estimation of the skin-to-epidural space distance is of considerable clinical importance.

Although racial differences in epidural depth have been reported, systematic investigations specifically targeting the Chinese population remain scarce. Various imaging modalities, including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound, can be used to predict epidural depth. However, these examinations increase healthcare burden and are not always feasible in emergency or bedside settings. Consequently, identifying simple, easily obtainable clinical parameters-such as sex, age, and body mass index (BMI)-for predicting epidural depth has become a research priority.

In this context, the present study aimed to identify factors influencing epidural depth through a retrospective analysis of clinical data from PCNL patients and to develop simple, level-specific predictive models for different puncture sites, thereby providing a practical reference for clinical epidural anesthesia.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Estimé)

3278

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

  • Nom: Hongbo Zheng, MM
  • Numéro de téléphone: +8618040544926
  • E-mail: zheng1283@163.com

Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, Chine, 430030
        • Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon non probabiliste

Population étudiée

Adult patients who underwent PCNL under continuous epidural anesthesia between January 2014 and December 2025. All patients were treated at a single academic medical center. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and anesthesia records.

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Successful epidural puncture and catheter placement using the midline approach
  • Clear documentation of puncture level and puncture depth in the anesthesia record

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dural puncture during anesthesia (including those who subsequently had a successful repuncture)
  • Use of the paramedian approach for epidural puncture
  • Uncertain epidural anesthesia effect requiring combined general anesthesia
  • Incomplete clinical data

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
T11-T12
On operating room admission, after providing written informed consent for anesthesia, patients underwent standard monitoring (ECG, NIBP, pulse oximetry). Baseline demographic and anthropometric data, including hospital admission ID, sex, height, and weight, were recorded, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. After positioning in the lateral decubitus position, the T11-T12 interspace was selected for puncture using a midline approach, and the loss-of-resistance technique confirmed epidural space entry. Puncture depth (skin-to-epidural space) was recorded from needle shaft markings to the nearest 0.1 cm.
T12-L1
On operating room admission, after providing written informed consent for anesthesia, patients underwent standard monitoring (ECG, NIBP, pulse oximetry). Baseline demographic and anthropometric data, including hospital admission ID, sex, height, and weight, were recorded, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. After positioning in the lateral decubitus position, the T12-L1 interspace was selected for puncture using a midline approach, and the loss-of-resistance technique confirmed epidural space entry. Puncture depth (skin-to-epidural space) was recorded from needle shaft markings to the nearest 0.1 cm.
L1-L2
On operating room admission, after providing written informed consent for anesthesia, patients underwent standard monitoring (ECG, NIBP, pulse oximetry). Baseline demographic and anthropometric data, including hospital admission ID, sex, height, and weight, were recorded, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. After positioning in the lateral decubitus position, the L1-L2 interspace was selected for puncture using a midline approach, and the loss-of-resistance technique confirmed epidural space entry. Puncture depth (skin-to-epidural space) was recorded from needle shaft markings to the nearest 0.1 cm.
L2-L3
On operating room admission, after providing written informed consent for anesthesia, patients underwent standard monitoring (ECG, NIBP, pulse oximetry). Baseline demographic and anthropometric data, including hospital admission ID, sex, height, and weight, were recorded, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. After positioning in the lateral decubitus position, the L2-L3 interspace was selected for puncture using a midline approach, and the loss-of-resistance technique confirmed epidural space entry. Puncture depth (skin-to-epidural space) was recorded from needle shaft markings to the nearest 0.1 cm.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Epidural depth
Délai: Perioperative/Periprocedural
Epidural depth, defined as the vertical distance from the skin surface to the epidural space measured at the time of puncture using the loss-of-resistance technique via the midline approach. Depth was recorded from the needle shaft markings to the nearest 0.1 cm.
Perioperative/Periprocedural

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Adjusted R²
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 month
The coefficient of determination adjusted for the number of predictors in the model, reflecting the proportion of variance in epidural depth explained by the predictive model at each puncture level. Higher values indicate better model fit.
through study completion, an average of 1 month
Root mean square error (RMSE)
Délai: through study completion, an average of 1 month
The square root of the average squared difference between the model-predicted epidural depth and the actual measured depth, expressed in cm. Lower values indicate better predictive accuracy of the model at each puncture level.
through study completion, an average of 1 month

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Hongbo Zheng, MM, Tongji Hospital

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

30 juin 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

31 août 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

31 août 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

5 juillet 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

5 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

10 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

16 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

13 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables,figures, and appendices).

Délai de partage IPD

Immediately followingpublication. No end date.

Critères d'accès au partage IPD

Anyone who wishes to access the data.

Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD

  • PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
  • SÈVE

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner