Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Predictors of Epidural Depth in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Model Development

13 de julho de 2026 atualizado por: Hongbo Zheng, Tongji Hospital

Analysis of Factors Influencing Epidural Depth in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Development of a Predictive Model

Accurate estimation of epidural depth is critical for safe epidural anesthesia during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Although various imaging modalities can predict epidural depth, they increase healthcare burden and are not always feasible in emergency or bedside settings. Identifying simple, easily obtainable clinical parameters-such as sex, age, and body mass index (BMI)-for predicting epidural depth has become a research priority. However, systematic investigations specifically targeting the Chinese population remain scarce. This retrospective study aims to identify independent factors influencing epidural depth in PCNL patients and to develop simple, level-specific predictive models for different puncture sites, thereby providing a practical reference for clinical epidural anesthesia.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Ainda não está recrutando

Descrição detalhada

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard minimally invasive surgical procedure for removal of kidney stones larger than 2 cm and is established as the gold standard for the management of complex renal calculi. This procedure may be performed under either general anesthesia or regional anesthesia, including epidural or spinal anesthesia. Accumulating meta-analyses have demonstrated that, compared with general anesthesia, regional anesthesia is associated with reduced postoperative pain scores and lower total hospital costs, without compromising the stone-free rate. Furthermore, in awake patients undergoing regional anesthesia, respiratory movements may generate a so-called "respiratory-synchronous stone fragmentation effect," which facilitates the expulsion of stone debris.

Successful epidural anesthesia relies critically on accurate identification of the epidural space and precise control of puncture depth. Insufficient puncture depth may result in improper catheter placement and subsequent block failure, whereas excessive puncture depth increases the risk of dural puncture, leading to cerebrospinal fluid leakage and post-dural puncture headache. In severe cases, inadvertent injection of a large dose of local anesthetics into the subarachnoid space can cause life-threatening cardiovascular and respiratory depression. Therefore, preprocedural estimation of the skin-to-epidural space distance is of considerable clinical importance.

Although racial differences in epidural depth have been reported, systematic investigations specifically targeting the Chinese population remain scarce. Various imaging modalities, including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound, can be used to predict epidural depth. However, these examinations increase healthcare burden and are not always feasible in emergency or bedside settings. Consequently, identifying simple, easily obtainable clinical parameters-such as sex, age, and body mass index (BMI)-for predicting epidural depth has become a research priority.

In this context, the present study aimed to identify factors influencing epidural depth through a retrospective analysis of clinical data from PCNL patients and to develop simple, level-specific predictive models for different puncture sites, thereby providing a practical reference for clinical epidural anesthesia.

Tipo de estudo

Observacional

Inscrição (Estimado)

3278

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

  • Nome: Hongbo Zheng, MM
  • Número de telefone: +8618040544926
  • E-mail: zheng1283@163.com

Estude backup de contato

Locais de estudo

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430030
        • Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
        • Contato:
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Método de amostragem

Amostra Não Probabilística

População do estudo

Adult patients who underwent PCNL under continuous epidural anesthesia between January 2014 and December 2025. All patients were treated at a single academic medical center. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and anesthesia records.

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Successful epidural puncture and catheter placement using the midline approach
  • Clear documentation of puncture level and puncture depth in the anesthesia record

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dural puncture during anesthesia (including those who subsequently had a successful repuncture)
  • Use of the paramedian approach for epidural puncture
  • Uncertain epidural anesthesia effect requiring combined general anesthesia
  • Incomplete clinical data

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

Coortes e Intervenções

Grupo / Coorte
T11-T12
On operating room admission, after providing written informed consent for anesthesia, patients underwent standard monitoring (ECG, NIBP, pulse oximetry). Baseline demographic and anthropometric data, including hospital admission ID, sex, height, and weight, were recorded, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. After positioning in the lateral decubitus position, the T11-T12 interspace was selected for puncture using a midline approach, and the loss-of-resistance technique confirmed epidural space entry. Puncture depth (skin-to-epidural space) was recorded from needle shaft markings to the nearest 0.1 cm.
T12-L1
On operating room admission, after providing written informed consent for anesthesia, patients underwent standard monitoring (ECG, NIBP, pulse oximetry). Baseline demographic and anthropometric data, including hospital admission ID, sex, height, and weight, were recorded, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. After positioning in the lateral decubitus position, the T12-L1 interspace was selected for puncture using a midline approach, and the loss-of-resistance technique confirmed epidural space entry. Puncture depth (skin-to-epidural space) was recorded from needle shaft markings to the nearest 0.1 cm.
L1-L2
On operating room admission, after providing written informed consent for anesthesia, patients underwent standard monitoring (ECG, NIBP, pulse oximetry). Baseline demographic and anthropometric data, including hospital admission ID, sex, height, and weight, were recorded, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. After positioning in the lateral decubitus position, the L1-L2 interspace was selected for puncture using a midline approach, and the loss-of-resistance technique confirmed epidural space entry. Puncture depth (skin-to-epidural space) was recorded from needle shaft markings to the nearest 0.1 cm.
L2-L3
On operating room admission, after providing written informed consent for anesthesia, patients underwent standard monitoring (ECG, NIBP, pulse oximetry). Baseline demographic and anthropometric data, including hospital admission ID, sex, height, and weight, were recorded, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. After positioning in the lateral decubitus position, the L2-L3 interspace was selected for puncture using a midline approach, and the loss-of-resistance technique confirmed epidural space entry. Puncture depth (skin-to-epidural space) was recorded from needle shaft markings to the nearest 0.1 cm.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Epidural depth
Prazo: Perioperative/Periprocedural
Epidural depth, defined as the vertical distance from the skin surface to the epidural space measured at the time of puncture using the loss-of-resistance technique via the midline approach. Depth was recorded from the needle shaft markings to the nearest 0.1 cm.
Perioperative/Periprocedural

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Adjusted R²
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 month
The coefficient of determination adjusted for the number of predictors in the model, reflecting the proportion of variance in epidural depth explained by the predictive model at each puncture level. Higher values indicate better model fit.
through study completion, an average of 1 month
Root mean square error (RMSE)
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 month
The square root of the average squared difference between the model-predicted epidural depth and the actual measured depth, expressed in cm. Lower values indicate better predictive accuracy of the model at each puncture level.
through study completion, an average of 1 month

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Hongbo Zheng, MM, Tongji Hospital

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

30 de junho de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

31 de agosto de 2026

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

31 de agosto de 2026

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

5 de julho de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

5 de julho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

10 de julho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

16 de julho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

13 de julho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de julho de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

SIM

Descrição do plano IPD

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables,figures, and appendices).

Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD

Immediately followingpublication. No end date.

Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD

Anyone who wishes to access the data.

Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
  • SEIVA

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever