- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT07697053
Predictors of Epidural Depth in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Model Development
Analysis of Factors Influencing Epidural Depth in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Development of a Predictive Model
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Descrição detalhada
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard minimally invasive surgical procedure for removal of kidney stones larger than 2 cm and is established as the gold standard for the management of complex renal calculi. This procedure may be performed under either general anesthesia or regional anesthesia, including epidural or spinal anesthesia. Accumulating meta-analyses have demonstrated that, compared with general anesthesia, regional anesthesia is associated with reduced postoperative pain scores and lower total hospital costs, without compromising the stone-free rate. Furthermore, in awake patients undergoing regional anesthesia, respiratory movements may generate a so-called "respiratory-synchronous stone fragmentation effect," which facilitates the expulsion of stone debris.
Successful epidural anesthesia relies critically on accurate identification of the epidural space and precise control of puncture depth. Insufficient puncture depth may result in improper catheter placement and subsequent block failure, whereas excessive puncture depth increases the risk of dural puncture, leading to cerebrospinal fluid leakage and post-dural puncture headache. In severe cases, inadvertent injection of a large dose of local anesthetics into the subarachnoid space can cause life-threatening cardiovascular and respiratory depression. Therefore, preprocedural estimation of the skin-to-epidural space distance is of considerable clinical importance.
Although racial differences in epidural depth have been reported, systematic investigations specifically targeting the Chinese population remain scarce. Various imaging modalities, including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound, can be used to predict epidural depth. However, these examinations increase healthcare burden and are not always feasible in emergency or bedside settings. Consequently, identifying simple, easily obtainable clinical parameters-such as sex, age, and body mass index (BMI)-for predicting epidural depth has become a research priority.
In this context, the present study aimed to identify factors influencing epidural depth through a retrospective analysis of clinical data from PCNL patients and to develop simple, level-specific predictive models for different puncture sites, thereby providing a practical reference for clinical epidural anesthesia.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Estimado)
Contactos e Locais
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Hongbo Zheng, MM
- Número de telefone: +8618040544926
- E-mail: zheng1283@163.com
Estude backup de contato
- Nome: Hong Chen Chen, MM
- Número de telefone: 17786127071
- E-mail: 2010tj0573@hust.edu.cn
Locais de estudo
-
-
Hubei
-
Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430030
- Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
-
Contato:
- Hongbo Zheng, MM
- Número de telefone: +8618040544926
- E-mail: zheng1283@163.com
-
Contato:
- E-mail: zheng1283@163.com
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Método de amostragem
População do estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Successful epidural puncture and catheter placement using the midline approach
- Clear documentation of puncture level and puncture depth in the anesthesia record
Exclusion Criteria:
- Dural puncture during anesthesia (including those who subsequently had a successful repuncture)
- Use of the paramedian approach for epidural puncture
- Uncertain epidural anesthesia effect requiring combined general anesthesia
- Incomplete clinical data
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
Coortes e Intervenções
Grupo / Coorte |
|---|
|
T11-T12
On operating room admission, after providing written informed consent for anesthesia, patients underwent standard monitoring (ECG, NIBP, pulse oximetry).
Baseline demographic and anthropometric data, including hospital admission ID, sex, height, and weight, were recorded, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated.
After positioning in the lateral decubitus position, the T11-T12 interspace was selected for puncture using a midline approach, and the loss-of-resistance technique confirmed epidural space entry.
Puncture depth (skin-to-epidural space) was recorded from needle shaft markings to the nearest 0.1 cm.
|
|
T12-L1
On operating room admission, after providing written informed consent for anesthesia, patients underwent standard monitoring (ECG, NIBP, pulse oximetry).
Baseline demographic and anthropometric data, including hospital admission ID, sex, height, and weight, were recorded, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated.
After positioning in the lateral decubitus position, the T12-L1 interspace was selected for puncture using a midline approach, and the loss-of-resistance technique confirmed epidural space entry.
Puncture depth (skin-to-epidural space) was recorded from needle shaft markings to the nearest 0.1 cm.
|
|
L1-L2
On operating room admission, after providing written informed consent for anesthesia, patients underwent standard monitoring (ECG, NIBP, pulse oximetry).
Baseline demographic and anthropometric data, including hospital admission ID, sex, height, and weight, were recorded, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated.
After positioning in the lateral decubitus position, the L1-L2 interspace was selected for puncture using a midline approach, and the loss-of-resistance technique confirmed epidural space entry.
Puncture depth (skin-to-epidural space) was recorded from needle shaft markings to the nearest 0.1 cm.
|
|
L2-L3
On operating room admission, after providing written informed consent for anesthesia, patients underwent standard monitoring (ECG, NIBP, pulse oximetry).
Baseline demographic and anthropometric data, including hospital admission ID, sex, height, and weight, were recorded, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated.
After positioning in the lateral decubitus position, the L2-L3 interspace was selected for puncture using a midline approach, and the loss-of-resistance technique confirmed epidural space entry.
Puncture depth (skin-to-epidural space) was recorded from needle shaft markings to the nearest 0.1 cm.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Epidural depth
Prazo: Perioperative/Periprocedural
|
Epidural depth, defined as the vertical distance from the skin surface to the epidural space measured at the time of puncture using the loss-of-resistance technique via the midline approach.
Depth was recorded from the needle shaft markings to the nearest 0.1 cm.
|
Perioperative/Periprocedural
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Adjusted R²
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 month
|
The coefficient of determination adjusted for the number of predictors in the model, reflecting the proportion of variance in epidural depth explained by the predictive model at each puncture level.
Higher values indicate better model fit.
|
through study completion, an average of 1 month
|
|
Root mean square error (RMSE)
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 1 month
|
The square root of the average squared difference between the model-predicted epidural depth and the actual measured depth, expressed in cm.
Lower values indicate better predictive accuracy of the model at each puncture level.
|
through study completion, an average of 1 month
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Hongbo Zheng, MM, Tongji Hospital
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Estimado)
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- EDPN
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Descrição do plano IPD
Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD
Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD
Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
- SEIVA
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .