Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Hyaluronic Acid Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma for Chronic Tendinopathy and Enthesopathy

14 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Tomasz Wnuk, MD, PhD, Ortonika Orthopedic Medical Clinic in Lublin

Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Hyaluronic Acid and Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections in the Treatment of Chronic Tendinopathies and Enthesopathies: A Prospective, Randomized Comparative Study

Chronic tendinopathies and enthesopathies are common musculoskeletal conditions in orthopedics and sports medicine, frequently leading to pain, impaired function, and significantly reduced quality of life. Their pathogenesis involves tissue degeneration and ineffective repair response, often without an active inflammatory process.

Standard conservative management based on physiotherapy and activity modification is often prolonged and not always satisfactory. Minimally invasive injectable interventions supporting tendon and enthesis regeneration represent a promising alternative due to their favorable safety profile and outpatient feasibility.

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a glycosaminoglycan naturally present in connective tissues. In the context of tendinopathy, it is thought to modulate inflammatory processes, provide mechanical protection by reducing friction and adhesion within the tendon sheath, and support the proper organization of collagen fibers in the tendon matrix.

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous concentrate of platelets providing high local concentrations of growth factors, including platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which initiate and support repair processes, cellular proliferation, and angiogenesis.

This prospective, randomized, open-label, two-arm study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in 80 participants with chronic Achilles tendinopathy or medial epicondylopathy of the elbow. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either two HA injections or two PRP injections administered two weeks apart under ultrasonographic guidance. Follow-up will continue for 12 months after the second injection. The primary outcomes are the changes from baseline to 6 months in pain intensity measured using a 100-millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), upper-limb function measured using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire in participants with medial epicondylopathy, and Achilles tendon symptoms and function measured using the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire in participants with Achilles tendinopathy. The results will provide evidence to support the selection of injectable treatment for chronic tendinopathies and enthesopathies.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Recrutement

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

80

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

  • Pologne
    • Lublin Voivodeship
      • Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship, Pologne, 20-841
        • Recrutement
        • Ortonika Orthopedic Medical Clinic in Lublin
        • Contact:
        • Chercheur principal:
          • Tomasz Wnuk, MD, PhD
        • Sous-enquêteur:
          • Piotr Przybylski, MD, PhD
        • Sous-enquêteur:
          • Mateusz Matyjaszczyk, MD
        • Sous-enquêteur:
          • Przemysław Golonka, MD
        • Sous-enquêteur:
          • Damian Borys, MD
        • Sous-enquêteur:
          • Beata Krupska, MSc
        • Sous-enquêteur:
          • Emilia Antoniewska, MSc

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic tendinopathy or enthesopathy of the Achilles tendon or tendon insertion in the elbow region (medial epicondylopathy, so-called golfer's elbow)
  • Symptom duration exceeding 3 months
  • Pain intensity of at least 40 millimeters (mm) on a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
  • Age 18-65 years
  • Signed written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous surgical treatment of the studied tendon or tendon insertion
  • Prior injection of corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), or hyaluronic acid into the area being studied within 3 months before enrollment
  • Active systemic or local infection at the planned injection site
  • Systemic inflammatory or autoimmune disease involving the joints, including rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, or systemic lupus erythematosus
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Body mass index (BMI) of 40 kilograms per square meter (kg/m²) or greater

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Arm 1 - Hyaluronic Acid (HA)
Two peritendinous or intratendinous injections of hyaluronic acid (HA), containing 32 milligrams (mg) of sodium hyaluronate in 2 milliliters (mL) per injection, administered two weeks apart under ultrasonographic guidance.
Dispositif: Hyaluronic acid injection
Assigned to: Arm 1
Expérimental: Arm 2 - Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)
Two peritendinous or intratendinous injections of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP), administered two weeks apart under ultrasonographic guidance.
Dispositif: Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection
Assigned to: Arm 2

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Mean Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Measured Using the 100-Millimeter Visual Analog Scale at 6 Months
Délai: Baseline and 6 months after the second injection
Pain intensity will be measured using a 100-millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 mm, indicating no pain, to 100 mm, indicating the worst imaginable pain. The outcome will be the mean change in VAS score from baseline to 6 months after the second injection. A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Baseline and 6 months after the second injection
Mean Change From Baseline in the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score at 6 Months
Délai: Baseline and 6 months after the second injection
Upper-limb symptoms and function will be assessed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire in participants with medial epicondylopathy. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating greater disability. The outcome will be the mean change from baseline to 6 months after the second injection. A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Baseline and 6 months after the second injection
Mean Change From Baseline in the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles Score at 6 Months
Délai: Baseline and 6 months after the second injection
Symptoms and function associated with Achilles tendinopathy will be assessed using the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire in participants with Achilles tendinopathy. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating better function and fewer symptoms. The outcome will be the mean change from baseline to 6 months after the second injection. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Baseline and 6 months after the second injection

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Mean Change From Baseline in Pain Intensity Measured Using the 100-Millimeter Visual Analog Scale at 1, 3, and 12 Months
Délai: Baseline and 1, 3, and 12 months after the second injection
Pain intensity will be measured using a 100-millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 mm, indicating no pain, to 100 mm, indicating the worst imaginable pain. Mean changes from baseline will be assessed separately at 1, 3, and 12 months after the second injection. A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Baseline and 1, 3, and 12 months after the second injection
Mean Change From Baseline in the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score at 1, 3, and 12 Months
Délai: Baseline and 1, 3, and 12 months after the second injection
Upper-limb symptoms and function will be assessed using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire in participants with medial epicondylopathy. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating greater disability. Mean changes from baseline will be assessed separately at 1, 3, and 12 months after the second injection. A decrease in score indicates improvement.
Baseline and 1, 3, and 12 months after the second injection
Mean Change From Baseline in the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles Score at 1, 3, and 12 Months
Délai: Baseline and 1, 3, and 12 months after the second injection
Symptoms and function associated with Achilles tendinopathy will be assessed using the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire in participants with Achilles tendinopathy. The total score ranges from 0 to 100 points, with higher scores indicating better function and fewer symptoms. Mean changes from baseline will be assessed separately at 1, 3, and 12 months after the second injection. An increase in score indicates improvement.
Baseline and 1, 3, and 12 months after the second injection
Time From the Second Injection to Return to the Pre-Injury Level of Physical Activity
Délai: From the second injection through 12 months of follow-up
The number of days from the second injection to the first documented return to the participant's pre-injury level of physical activity without activity restrictions will be recorded. Participants who do not return to their pre-injury activity level during follow-up will be considered not to have experienced the event by the end of the 12-month follow-up period.
From the second injection through 12 months of follow-up
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, or Adverse Device Effects
Délai: From the first injection through 12 months after the second injection
The number and percentage of participants experiencing one or more adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), or adverse device effects (ADEs) will be reported. Events will be assessed according to their type, severity, seriousness, and relationship to the administered intervention.
From the first injection through 12 months after the second injection

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Ortonika Orthopedic Medical Clinic in Lublin

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Tomasz Wnuk, MD, PhD, Ortonika Orthopedic Medical Clinic

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

10 juin 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 juin 2028

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 juin 2028

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

3 juillet 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

20 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

20 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 1.0 13.04.2026

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner