Internal Irrigation Surgery
Evaluation of an Internal Irrigation Surgical Guide to Reduce Heat Generation During Dental Implant Surgery
Heat generated during osteotomy and implant placement may cause thermal injury to bone and adversely affect healing and osseointegration. External irrigation is commonly used to reduce heat generation; however, cooling may be less effective at the drill-bone interface, particularly during guided implant surgery.
Surgical guides with integrated irrigation channels have been developed to deliver coolant more directly to the osteotomy site, but clinical evidence regarding their effectiveness remains limited. This study will evaluate whether an internal irrigation surgical guide system reduces heat generation during osteotomy compared with a conventional guided implant surgery approach. The study will also assess clinical outcomes associated with implant placement. The findings may help inform safer and more effective protocols for guided dental implant surgery.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Heat generation during osteotomy and implant placement is a critical concern in implant dentistry, as excessive temperatures can lead to bone necrosis, impaired healing, and early implant failure. A temperature increase of 10°C can be considered a threshold for potential issues. Bone cell damage can occur if the temperature reaches 47°C.3 A temperature of 47°C for 1 minute can impair implant osseointegration. The current standard of care involves the use of external irrigation to reduce heat generation during the drilling process. However, this method has limitations including poor visibility of surgical site, uneven cooling at the drill-bone interface, and inability to directly cool in guided surgery.
To address these concerns, recent innovations include surgical guides with integrated irrigation channels, which direct cooling fluid more efficiently to the drilling site and may reduce the risk of heat-induced bone injury. However, clinical evidence supporting the superiority of these advanced irrigation guides over traditional designs is still limited, highlighting the need for further research to optimize both surgical safety and outcomes.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an internal irrigation surgical guide system in reducing heat generation during osteotomy and improving outcomes of dental implant surgery. The findings from this study could inform clinical practice and contribute to the development of safer, more effective implant placement protocols.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Radi Masri
- Numéro de téléphone: 410 706 8133
- E-mail: rmasri@umaryland.edu
Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude
- Nom: Hanae Saito
- Numéro de téléphone: 410 706 3646
- E-mail: hsaito@umaryland.edu
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, États-Unis, 21201
- University of Maryland School of Dentistry
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
- Adulte plus âgé
Accepte les volontaires sains
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 25+
- Patients requiring a dental implant in the maxilla or mandible
- Patients with sufficient bone volume for implant placement.
- Patients classified as ASA I or II based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system.
- Patients capable of providing informed consent and willing to adhere to study procedures and follow-up appointments.
- Patients with adequate interarch space to accommodate guided implant surgery.
- No history of implant placement at the experimental or control site.
Exclusion Criteria:
- ASA class 3 or higher
- Currently undergoing or history of bisphosphonate or antiresorptive therapy
- Patients who have received prior radiation therapy to the head and neck.
- Patients with contraindications for implant placement, such as active infections or severe periodontal disease.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Patients with psychiatric or cognitive conditions impairing informed consent or compliance
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Comparateur actif: Conventional Surgical Guide With External Irrigation
Implant osteotomy and implant placement will be performed using a conventional surgical guide with standard external sterile saline irrigation.
|
Conventional guided implant osteotomy using external sterile saline irrigation.
|
|
Expérimental: Irrigation-Integrated Surgical Guide
Implant osteotomy and implant placement will be performed using a surgical guide incorporating an internal irrigation channel designed to direct sterile saline to the drill-bone interface.
|
Guided implant osteotomy using a surgical guide with an integrated irrigation channel for delivery of sterile saline to the osteotomy site.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Early Implant Failure
Délai: From implant placement through 6 months postoperatively
|
Number and percentage of dental implants demonstrating clinical mobility or implant loss before prosthetic loading.
|
From implant placement through 6 months postoperatively
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Early Marginal Bone Level Change
Délai: Implant placement, approximately 3 months postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively
|
Change in marginal bone level measured on standardized periapical radiographs relative to the implant platform.
|
Implant placement, approximately 3 months postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively
|
|
Peri-implant Radiolucency
Délai: Through 6 months postoperatively
|
Presence or absence of radiographic radiolucency surrounding the dental implant.
|
Through 6 months postoperatively
|
|
Persistent Peri-implant Pain or Suppuration
Délai: Through 6 months postoperatively
|
Number and percentage of implant sites demonstrating persistent pain or suppuration during postoperative follow-up.
|
Through 6 months postoperatively
|
|
Clinician-Reported Ease of Use
Délai: Immediately after implant placement
|
Clinician assessment of the ease of use, procedural efficiency, and perceived clinical benefit of the assigned surgical guide using a study-specific postoperative questionnaire.
Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater ease of use, efficiency, or perceived benefit.
|
Immediately after implant placement
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- HP-00119624
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .