Internal Irrigation Surgery
Evaluation of an Internal Irrigation Surgical Guide to Reduce Heat Generation During Dental Implant Surgery
Heat generated during osteotomy and implant placement may cause thermal injury to bone and adversely affect healing and osseointegration. External irrigation is commonly used to reduce heat generation; however, cooling may be less effective at the drill-bone interface, particularly during guided implant surgery.
Surgical guides with integrated irrigation channels have been developed to deliver coolant more directly to the osteotomy site, but clinical evidence regarding their effectiveness remains limited. This study will evaluate whether an internal irrigation surgical guide system reduces heat generation during osteotomy compared with a conventional guided implant surgery approach. The study will also assess clinical outcomes associated with implant placement. The findings may help inform safer and more effective protocols for guided dental implant surgery.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Heat generation during osteotomy and implant placement is a critical concern in implant dentistry, as excessive temperatures can lead to bone necrosis, impaired healing, and early implant failure. A temperature increase of 10°C can be considered a threshold for potential issues. Bone cell damage can occur if the temperature reaches 47°C.3 A temperature of 47°C for 1 minute can impair implant osseointegration. The current standard of care involves the use of external irrigation to reduce heat generation during the drilling process. However, this method has limitations including poor visibility of surgical site, uneven cooling at the drill-bone interface, and inability to directly cool in guided surgery.
To address these concerns, recent innovations include surgical guides with integrated irrigation channels, which direct cooling fluid more efficiently to the drilling site and may reduce the risk of heat-induced bone injury. However, clinical evidence supporting the superiority of these advanced irrigation guides over traditional designs is still limited, highlighting the need for further research to optimize both surgical safety and outcomes.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an internal irrigation surgical guide system in reducing heat generation during osteotomy and improving outcomes of dental implant surgery. The findings from this study could inform clinical practice and contribute to the development of safer, more effective implant placement protocols.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Estimado)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Radi Masri
- Número de telefone: 410 706 8133
- E-mail: rmasri@umaryland.edu
Estude backup de contato
- Nome: Hanae Saito
- Número de telefone: 410 706 3646
- E-mail: hsaito@umaryland.edu
Locais de estudo
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, Estados Unidos, 21201
- University of Maryland School of Dentistry
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 25+
- Patients requiring a dental implant in the maxilla or mandible
- Patients with sufficient bone volume for implant placement.
- Patients classified as ASA I or II based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system.
- Patients capable of providing informed consent and willing to adhere to study procedures and follow-up appointments.
- Patients with adequate interarch space to accommodate guided implant surgery.
- No history of implant placement at the experimental or control site.
Exclusion Criteria:
- ASA class 3 or higher
- Currently undergoing or history of bisphosphonate or antiresorptive therapy
- Patients who have received prior radiation therapy to the head and neck.
- Patients with contraindications for implant placement, such as active infections or severe periodontal disease.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Patients with psychiatric or cognitive conditions impairing informed consent or compliance
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador Ativo: Conventional Surgical Guide With External Irrigation
Implant osteotomy and implant placement will be performed using a conventional surgical guide with standard external sterile saline irrigation.
|
Conventional guided implant osteotomy using external sterile saline irrigation.
|
|
Experimental: Irrigation-Integrated Surgical Guide
Implant osteotomy and implant placement will be performed using a surgical guide incorporating an internal irrigation channel designed to direct sterile saline to the drill-bone interface.
|
Guided implant osteotomy using a surgical guide with an integrated irrigation channel for delivery of sterile saline to the osteotomy site.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Early Implant Failure
Prazo: From implant placement through 6 months postoperatively
|
Number and percentage of dental implants demonstrating clinical mobility or implant loss before prosthetic loading.
|
From implant placement through 6 months postoperatively
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Early Marginal Bone Level Change
Prazo: Implant placement, approximately 3 months postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively
|
Change in marginal bone level measured on standardized periapical radiographs relative to the implant platform.
|
Implant placement, approximately 3 months postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively
|
|
Peri-implant Radiolucency
Prazo: Through 6 months postoperatively
|
Presence or absence of radiographic radiolucency surrounding the dental implant.
|
Through 6 months postoperatively
|
|
Persistent Peri-implant Pain or Suppuration
Prazo: Through 6 months postoperatively
|
Number and percentage of implant sites demonstrating persistent pain or suppuration during postoperative follow-up.
|
Through 6 months postoperatively
|
|
Clinician-Reported Ease of Use
Prazo: Immediately after implant placement
|
Clinician assessment of the ease of use, procedural efficiency, and perceived clinical benefit of the assigned surgical guide using a study-specific postoperative questionnaire.
Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater ease of use, efficiency, or perceived benefit.
|
Immediately after implant placement
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Estimado)
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- HP-00119624
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .