Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Medical Large Language Model-Assisted Diagnosis and Treatment in Primary Care Chronic Disease Management

27 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Jiangsu Taizhou People's Hospital

Verification and Application Study of Medical Large Language Model-Assisted Diagnosis and Treatment in Primary Care Chronic Disease Management: A Randomized Controlled Study

This study aims to explore the feasibility of using medical large language models to assist in chronic disease management. By setting up experimental and control group interventions and having experts blindly evaluate anonymized cases, it compares different management approaches in chronic disease care, verifying the scientific basis, effectiveness, and potential for broader use of medical large language models in supporting chronic disease management.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

20

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

  • Chine
    • Jiangsu
      • Taizhou, Jiangsu, Chine, 225300
        • The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
        • Contact:

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Work experience of 3 years or more;
  2. Able to complete the case assessment tasks required by the study;
  3. Have a practicing doctor qualification;
  4. Work at a township health center or community health service center;
  5. Voluntarily participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

N/A

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Autre
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: LLM-Assisted Intervention Group
Primary care doctors creating management plans for chronic diseases (coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, stroke) with the help of large medical language models
Dispositif: Medical large language model
The primary care physicians in the intervention group completed the management decisions for chronic disease cases, including disease assessment, examination suggestions, treatment plans, selection of management methods, and health education, with the assistance of the medical LLM.
Aucune intervention: Usual Care Control Group
Primary care doctors creating management plans for chronic diseases (coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, stroke) without the help of a large medical language model

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
expert overall scores
Délai: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. They rated them using a Likert scale on several aspects: accuracy of condition assessment, reasonableness of test recommendations, reasonableness of treatment plans, appropriateness of management choices, scientific nature of patient education content, feasibility at the primary care level, overall clinical quality. Experts were instructed to rank the seven dimensions from lowest to highest quality. These ordinal rankings were then converted into standardized scores of 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
accuracy of condition assessment
Délai: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. They rated them using a Likert scale on accuracy of condition assessment from lowest to highest quality. These ordinal rankings were then converted into standardized scores of 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
reasonableness of test recommendations
Délai: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. They rated them using a Likert scale regarding the reasonableness of test recommendations. Experts were instructed to rank the dimension from lowest to highest quality. These ordinal rankings were then converted into standardized scores of 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
reasonableness of treatment plans
Délai: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. They rated them using a Likert scale regarding the reasonableness of treatment plans. Experts were instructed to rank the dimension from lowest to highest quality. These ordinal rankings were then converted into standardized scores of 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
appropriateness of management choices
Délai: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. They rated them using a Likert scale regarding the ppropriateness of management choices. Experts were instructed to rank the dimension from lowest to highest quality. These ordinal rankings were then converted into standardized scores of 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
scientific nature of patient education content
Délai: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. They rated them using a Likert scale regarding the scientific nature of patient education content. Experts were instructed to rank the dimension from lowest to highest quality. These ordinal rankings were then converted into standardized scores of 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
feasibility at the primary care level
Délai: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. They rated them using a Likert scale regarding the feasibility at the primary care level. Experts were instructed to rank the dimension from lowest to highest quality. These ordinal rankings were then converted into standardized scores of 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
the overall clinical quality
Délai: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. They rated them using a Likert scale regarding the overall clinical quality. Experts were instructed to rank the dimension from lowest to highest quality. These ordinal rankings were then converted into standardized scores of 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
risk advice
Délai: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. If there is no risk advice, the expert selects 'No'; otherwise, the expert selects 'Yes' and specifically lists the content of the risk advice.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
Any diagnostic or treatment information missing
Délai: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. If there is no omission of diagnostic and treatment information, the expert selects "No"; otherwise, the expert selects "Yes" and specifically lists the omitted diagnostic and treatment content.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
feedback regarding the use of medical LLM by primary care physicians
Délai: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
After primary care physicians complete a case assessment assisted by medical LLM , they will fill out an evaluation of the medical LLM usage, including whether the medical LLM helped in disease assessment, assisted in formulating examination plans, aided in developing treatment plans, improved chronic disease management capabilities, supported chronic disease education, assisted in management approach selection, enhanced confidence, saved time, whether there were hallucinations or omissions, whether it provided risky suggestions, and any additional comments on the use of the medical LLM.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Jiangsu Taizhou People's Hospital

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

17 août 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

30 septembre 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

30 novembre 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

20 juillet 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

27 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

31 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

31 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

27 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • LSKY 2026-114-01

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner