Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Medical Large Language Model-Assisted Diagnosis and Treatment in Primary Care Chronic Disease Management

27. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: Jiangsu Taizhou People's Hospital

Verification and Application Study of Medical Large Language Model-Assisted Diagnosis and Treatment in Primary Care Chronic Disease Management: A Randomized Controlled Study

This study aims to explore the feasibility of using medical large language models to assist in chronic disease management. By setting up experimental and control group interventions and having experts blindly evaluate anonymized cases, it compares different management approaches in chronic disease care, verifying the scientific basis, effectiveness, and potential for broader use of medical large language models in supporting chronic disease management.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

20

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studienorte

  • China
    • Jiangsu
      • Taizhou, Jiangsu, China, 225300
        • The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
        • Kontakt:

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Work experience of 3 years or more;
  2. Able to complete the case assessment tasks required by the study;
  3. Have a practicing doctor qualification;
  4. Work at a township health center or community health service center;
  5. Voluntarily participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

N/A

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Sonstiges
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Aktiver Komparator: LLM-Assisted Intervention Group
Primary care doctors creating management plans for chronic diseases (coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, stroke) with the help of large medical language models
Gerät: Medical large language model
The primary care physicians in the intervention group completed the management decisions for chronic disease cases, including disease assessment, examination suggestions, treatment plans, selection of management methods, and health education, with the assistance of the medical LLM.
Kein Eingriff: Usual Care Control Group
Primary care doctors creating management plans for chronic diseases (coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, stroke) without the help of a large medical language model

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
expert overall scores
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. They rated them using a Likert scale on several aspects: accuracy of condition assessment, reasonableness of test recommendations, reasonableness of treatment plans, appropriateness of management choices, scientific nature of patient education content, feasibility at the primary care level, overall clinical quality. Experts were instructed to rank the seven dimensions from lowest to highest quality. These ordinal rankings were then converted into standardized scores of 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
accuracy of condition assessment
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. They rated them using a Likert scale on accuracy of condition assessment from lowest to highest quality. These ordinal rankings were then converted into standardized scores of 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
reasonableness of test recommendations
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. They rated them using a Likert scale regarding the reasonableness of test recommendations. Experts were instructed to rank the dimension from lowest to highest quality. These ordinal rankings were then converted into standardized scores of 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
reasonableness of treatment plans
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. They rated them using a Likert scale regarding the reasonableness of treatment plans. Experts were instructed to rank the dimension from lowest to highest quality. These ordinal rankings were then converted into standardized scores of 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
appropriateness of management choices
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. They rated them using a Likert scale regarding the ppropriateness of management choices. Experts were instructed to rank the dimension from lowest to highest quality. These ordinal rankings were then converted into standardized scores of 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
scientific nature of patient education content
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. They rated them using a Likert scale regarding the scientific nature of patient education content. Experts were instructed to rank the dimension from lowest to highest quality. These ordinal rankings were then converted into standardized scores of 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
feasibility at the primary care level
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. They rated them using a Likert scale regarding the feasibility at the primary care level. Experts were instructed to rank the dimension from lowest to highest quality. These ordinal rankings were then converted into standardized scores of 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
the overall clinical quality
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. They rated them using a Likert scale regarding the overall clinical quality. Experts were instructed to rank the dimension from lowest to highest quality. These ordinal rankings were then converted into standardized scores of 1 to 5. Higher scores mean better.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
risk advice
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. If there is no risk advice, the expert selects 'No'; otherwise, the expert selects 'Yes' and specifically lists the content of the risk advice.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
Any diagnostic or treatment information missing
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
A total of 200 cases (50 each of coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and stroke) were grouped by disease type and independently evaluated in a blinded manner by three subspecialty experts. For each case, the two management plans were anonymized in the same way and then randomly labeled by a computer as Plan A and Plan B. Experts could only view the anonymized case information and the two corresponding anonymized management plans. If there is no omission of diagnostic and treatment information, the expert selects "No"; otherwise, the expert selects "Yes" and specifically lists the omitted diagnostic and treatment content.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.
feedback regarding the use of medical LLM by primary care physicians
Zeitfenster: through study completion, an average of 3 months.
After primary care physicians complete a case assessment assisted by medical LLM , they will fill out an evaluation of the medical LLM usage, including whether the medical LLM helped in disease assessment, assisted in formulating examination plans, aided in developing treatment plans, improved chronic disease management capabilities, supported chronic disease education, assisted in management approach selection, enhanced confidence, saved time, whether there were hallucinations or omissions, whether it provided risky suggestions, and any additional comments on the use of the medical LLM.
through study completion, an average of 3 months.

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Jiangsu Taizhou People's Hospital

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

17. August 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

30. September 2026

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

30. November 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

20. Juli 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

27. Juli 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

31. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

31. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

27. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • LSKY 2026-114-01

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren