Patient-reported Outcomes-driven Supportive Care Navigation Among Hispanic/Latinx Cancer Patients
A Randomized Controlled, Type 1 Hybrid Effectiveness-implementation Trial Study to Compare the Effectiveness of a Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO)-Driven Culturally Grounded Supportive Care Navigation in Reducing Healthcare Disparities Among Hispanic/Latinx Patients Receiving Anticancer Therapies
This is a randomized controlled, type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a patient-reported outcomes (PRO)-driven culturally grounded supportive care navigation in reducing healthcare disparities among Hispanic/Latinx patients receiving anticancer therapies. The objectives of this study are: (1) to compare the effectiveness of an ePRO-driven culturally grounded supportive care navigation versus usual care (control) in Hispanic/Latinx patients undergoing anticancer treatment; and (2) to elicit perspectives from Hispanic/Latinx patients, healthcare providers, and community partners on how an ePRO-driven culturally grounded supportive care navigation can address health disparities.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Type d'étude
Inscription (Estimé)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Coordonnées de l'étude
- Nom: Fan-Ying Chan, MS
- Numéro de téléphone: 949-738-7135
- E-mail: fanyinc@uci.edu
Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude
- Nom: Matthew Heshmatipour, MPH
- Numéro de téléphone: 9494624610
- E-mail: mheshmat@hs.uci.edu
Lieux d'étude
-
-
California
-
Irvine, California, États-Unis, 92617
- Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 18 years old
- Hispanic/LatinX origin
- Newly diagnosed cancer patients
- Receiving anticancer treatment (may include combinations of intravenous or oral chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and/or immunotherapies)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Being physically and/or mentally incapable of providing written consent
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Soins de soutien
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Aucune intervention: Soins habituels
|
|
|
Expérimental: Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO)-driven supportive care navigation
|
Patients within the intervention arm will receive ePRO-driven supportive care navigation consisting of: (1) routine distress screening and care needs assessment; (2) machine learning-based acute care utilization risk prediction; (3) culturally grounded supportive care navigation; and (4) community follow-up. |
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and urgent care visits
Délai: baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
Detailed information regarding emergency department visits, hospitalization, and urgent care visits from the first 3 months of anticancer treatment (after joining the study) will be obtained using electronic medical records, and the UCI Health Data Warehouse. |
baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Health-related quality of life
Délai: baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
Quality of life will be measured Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health (PROMIS Global Health), a 10-item Likert scale (questions 1-8 and 10 on a 5-point scale and question 9 on an 11-point scale) instrument yielding two scores, physical health and mental health, where higher scores indicate better health. |
baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
|
Symptom severity
Délai: baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
Symptom severity will be assessed by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), an 11-point Likert scale (0-10) that measures symptom intensity. A change of at least one point is considered clinically meaningful, with higher scores indicating greater symptom burden. |
baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
|
Health literacy
Délai: baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
Health literacy will be assessed using the Brief Health Literacy Screening (BHLS) tool, with each item rated on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5, yielding a total score ranging from 3 to 15. Higher scores indicate better health literacy. |
baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
Autres mesures de résultats
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level
Délai: baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling will be used to collect and analyze CRP level (mg/L) |
baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
|
Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA) Level
Délai: Baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling will be used to collect and analyze IL-1RA level (pg/mL) |
Baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
|
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Level
Délai: Baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling will be used to collect and analyze IL-6 level (pg/mL) |
Baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
|
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α) Level
Délai: Baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling will be used to collect and analyze TNF-α level (pg/mL) |
Baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
|
TNF Receptor Type II (TNF-RII) Level
Délai: Baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling will be used to collect and analyze TNF-RII level (pg/mL) |
Baseline and 3 months post-baseline
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Les enquêteurs
- Chercheur principal: Alexandre Chan, PharmD, PhD, MPH, University of California, Irvine
Publications et liens utiles
Publications générales
- Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, Brown PM, Lynch P, Brown JM, Selby PJ. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Feb 15;22(4):714-24. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.078.
- Kotronoulas G, Kearney N, Maguire R, Harrow A, Di Domenico D, Croy S, MacGillivray S. What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 10;32(14):1480-501. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5948. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
- Alvidrez J, Castille D, Laude-Sharp M, Rosario A, Tabor D. The National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework. Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(S1):S16-S20. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304883.
- Cooper LA, Roter DL, Johnson RL, Ford DE, Steinwachs DM, Powe NR. Patient-centered communication, ratings of care, and concordance of patient and physician race. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Dec 2;139(11):907-15. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-11-200312020-00009.
- Wagner LI, Schink J, Bass M, Patel S, Diaz MV, Rothrock N, Pearman T, Gershon R, Penedo FJ, Rosen S, Cella D. Bringing PROMIS to practice: brief and precise symptom screening in ambulatory cancer care. Cancer. 2015 Mar 15;121(6):927-34. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29104. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
- Basch E, Reeve BB, Mitchell SA, Clauser SB, Minasian LM, Dueck AC, Mendoza TR, Hay J, Atkinson TM, Abernethy AP, Bruner DW, Cleeland CS, Sloan JA, Chilukuri R, Baumgartner P, Denicoff A, St Germain D, O'Mara AM, Chen A, Kelaghan J, Bennett AV, Sit L, Rogak L, Barz A, Paul DB, Schrag D. Development of the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Sep 29;106(9):dju244. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju244. Print 2014 Sep.
- Basch E, Barbera L, Kerrigan CL, Velikova G. Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Medical Care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:122-134. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_200383.
- Cheung YT, Chan A, Charalambous A, Darling HS, Eng L, Grech L, van den Hurk CJG, Kirk D, Mitchell SA, Poprawski D, Rammant E, Ramsey I, Fitch MI, Chan RJ. The use of patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer care: preliminary insights from a multinational scoping survey of oncology practitioners. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Feb;30(2):1427-1439. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06545-7. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
- Chan RJ, Milch VE, Crawford-Williams F, Agbejule OA, Joseph R, Johal J, Dick N, Wallen MP, Ratcliffe J, Agarwal A, Nekhlyudov L, Tieu M, Al-Momani M, Turnbull S, Sathiaraj R, Keefe D, Hart NH. Patient navigation across the cancer care continuum: An overview of systematic reviews and emerging literature. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Nov-Dec;73(6):565-589. doi: 10.3322/caac.21788. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
- Santos Salas A, Fuentes Contreras J, Armijo-Olivo S, Saltaji H, Watanabe S, Chambers T, Walter L, Cummings GG. Non-pharmacological cancer pain interventions in populations with social disparities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Feb;24(2):985-1000. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2998-9. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
- Duma N, Velazquez AI, Franco I, Kiel L, Levit LA, Schenkel C, Kirkwood K, Green S, Rodriguez G. Donde Estan? Latinx/Hispanic Representation in the Oncology Workforce: Present and Future. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 May;18(5):388-395. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00153.
- Seible DM, Kundu S, Azuara A, Cherry DR, Arias S, Nalawade VV, Cruz J, Arreola R, Martinez ME, Nodora JN, Rahn DA, Murphy JD. The Influence of Patient-Provider Language Concordance in Cancer Care: Results of the Hispanic Outcomes by Language Approach (HOLA) Randomized Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Nov 15;111(4):856-864. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.122. Epub 2021 May 29.
- Martinez KA, Snyder CF, Malin JL, Dy SM. Is race/ethnicity related to the presence or severity of pain in colorectal and lung cancer? J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Dec;48(6):1050-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
- Reyes-Gibby CC, Anderson KO, Shete S, Bruera E, Yennurajalingam S. Early referral to supportive care specialists for symptom burden in lung cancer patients: a comparison of non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics, and non-Hispanic blacks. Cancer. 2012 Feb 1;118(3):856-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26312. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
- Duran DG, Perez-Stable EJ. Novel Approaches to Advance Minority Health and Health Disparities Research. Am J Public Health. 2019 Jan;109(S1):S8-S10. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304931. No abstract available.
- John DA, Kawachi I, Lathan CS, Ayanian JZ. Disparities in perceived unmet need for supportive services among patients with lung cancer in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium. Cancer. 2014 Oct 15;120(20):3178-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28801. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
- Chan A, Ng DQ, Arcos D, Heshmatipour M, Lee BJ, Chen A, Duong L, Van L, Nguyen T, Green V, Hoang D. Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome-Driven Symptom Management by Oncology Pharmacists in a Majority-Minority Population: An Implementation Study. JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Dec;20(12):1744-1754. doi: 10.1200/OP.24.00050. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Estimé)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
- Tumeurs
- Administration des services de santé
- Qualité des soins de santé, accès et évaluation
- Techniques d'investigation
- Méthodes épidémiologiques
- Collecte de données
- Mécanismes d'évaluation des soins de santé
- Qualité des soins de santé
- Santé publique
- Environnement et santé publique
- Économie et organisations des soins de santé
- Évaluation des résultats, soins de santé
- Évaluation des résultats et des processus, soins de santé
- Enquêtes et questionnaires
- Planification de la santé
- Enquêtes sur les soins de santé
- Recherche des services de santé
- Évaluation des résultats des patients
- Mesures des résultats signalés par les patients
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 5677
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .