Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Clinical Validation Study Protocol for SmartEyes Smart Optometry Measurement Device (Medical Device Clinical Validation Study) (CVSP-SOMD)

2 septembre 2026 mis à jour par: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Clinical Validation Study of SmartEyes Smart Optometry Measurement Instrument for Objective Refraction Agreement, Repeatability, Optical Eye Relaxation Function, and Refractive Fine-Scale Prediction of Axial Length Growth in Pediatric and Adolescent Outpatient Refraction Settings

This study aims to evaluate the SmartEyes smart refraction measurement device in two phases under real outpatient optometry room visits at Wuhan Children's Hospital. The first phase used a prospective, single-center, stratified paired cross-sectional clinical validation design, evaluating the consistency between SmartEyes, Topcon KR-800, and subjective refraction/post-dilation refraction results among outpatient children and adolescents without and those requiring dilation, and evaluating the repeatability of the three devices under corresponding conditions. The second phase added prospective cohort follow-up to explore the relationship between SmartEyes fine scale refractive data and axial length growth, evaluating whether these results better match or predict short-term axial growth trends than traditional 0.25D stepped objective refraction results.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

This prospective, single-center, non-interventional clinical validation study is designed to systematically evaluate the clinical performance, accuracy, repeatability, and functional utility of the SmartEyes optometric measurement device in pediatric and adolescent outpatient settings.

The study enrolls pediatric and adolescent subjects presenting for routine optometric examinations, covering a diverse spectrum of refractive statuses, including myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism. The research design is structured into distinct phases and cohorts to thoroughly assess device performance under varying physiological conditions:

Phase I (Cross-Sectional Evaluation): Subjects are allocated into two parallel subgroups based on clinical routine and requirements:

Non-Cycloplegic Subgroup: Subjects complete two independent measurements with each of the three devices (Topcon KR-800, and the SmartEyes device) within a single visit, followed by subjective refraction. Between consecutive measurements, subjects are required to leave the chin/forehead rest and reposition to verify device repeatability. SmartEyes outputs its refractive results after completing its built-in optical eye relaxation protocol.

Cycloplegic Subgroup: Subjects undergo one measurement with each of the three devices prior to cycloplegia. Following routine clinical cycloplegia/ciliary muscle paralysis and subsequent subjective refraction, subjects complete two additional independent measurements with each of the three devices to evaluate repeatability and agreement under cycloplegic conditions. (Note: No extra or study-mandated cycloplegic drugs are administered solely for research purposes).

Phase II (Follow-up Evaluation): Conducts longitudinal tracking and follow-up assessments to evaluate the ongoing stability and consistency of the measurement devices over time.

To thoroughly validate the device's diagnostic capabilities, the study focuses on primary evaluation dimensions including accuracy validation (assessing agreement of sphere, cylinder, axis, spherical equivalent, and corneal curvature via Bland-Altman analysis, ICC, and Pearson correlation), repeatability validation through consecutive independent scans, and the assessment of adaptive optical relaxation functions.

This study does not involve any investigational drugs, invasive procedures, or alterations to standard clinical care pathways. The generated data will establish robust clinical evidence supporting the device's accuracy and stability, while providing standardized datasets for the continuous optimization of artificial intelligence-driven optometric algorithms and smart assistance platforms.

Type d'étude

Observationnel

Inscription (Estimé)

200

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

  • Nom: Jijing Li, MD, PhD
  • Numéro de téléphone: 027-83627088
  • E-mail: jijing.li@cevr.hk

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Méthode d'échantillonnage

Échantillon non probabiliste

Population étudiée

Pediatric and adolescent outpatients presenting for routine optometric examinations and refractive status evaluation at the clinical site.

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 6-17 years old, no gender limit;
  2. Visiting the outpatient optometry room of Wuhan Children's Hospital, clinically required refraction examination;
  3. Ability to cooperate in completing SmartEyes, Topcon KR-800, Topcon KR-1W examinations;
  4. Able to complete reliable subjective refraction;
  5. Subjects in the mydriasis subgroup should be those who need mydriasis/cycloplegia refraction for clinical diagnosis and treatment;
  6. Those who participate in the second phase cohort must be able to complete the axial length measurement and be willing to return to complete the 3-month (and 6-month) follow-up as planned;
  7. Guardians are fully informed and sign written informed consent;
  8. Subject children accept research notifications based on their age and understanding ability, and express agreement or no objection to participating in the research.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Those unable to maintain stable fixation, unable to cooperate with desktop equipment for examination, or unable to perform reliable subjective refraction;
  2. Obvious strabismus, nystagmus, severe amblyopia, or other conditions affecting the reliability of objective/subjective refraction;
  3. Keratoconus, obviously irregular astigmatism, corneal scarring, corneal edema, or other corneal diseases that significantly affect refractive measurement;
  4. Moderate to severe cataracts, obvious lens opacity, vitreous opacity, fundus diseases, and other conditions that may affect the refraction endpoint;
  5. History of previous corneal refractive surgery or intraocular surgery;
  6. Still wearing orthokeratology lenses, RGP, or other contact lenses on the day and determined by the investigator to affect measurement results;
  7. Participants in the second phase cohort who are unable to complete follow-up, plan to undergo eye surgery in the short term, or have investigators who judge axial measurement results to be clearly unreliable will not be included in the cohort follow-up analysis;
  8. Other circumstances where the investigator determines the participant is unsuitable for this study.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

Cohortes et interventions

Groupe / Cohorte
Intervention / Traitement
No pupil dilation subgroup(Phase I)
No pupil dilation subgroup: Subjects completed two independent tests each of Topcon KR-800 and SmartEyes smart optometry devices during the same outpatient procedure, followed by subjective refraction. Between two independent tests, subjects were asked to leave the mandibular rest/forehead rest and reposition to verify the repeatability of each device. Each SmartEyes test outputs the refraction results after completing the device's built-in optical eye relaxation process.
Used to acquire objective optometric parameters, including refractive errors and corneal measurements, during the clinical evaluation and comparison protocol.
Used to acquire objective optometric parameters, including refractive errors and corneal measurements, during the clinical evaluation and comparison protocol.
Routine refractive examination
Required pupil dilation subgroup(Phase I)
Before pupil dilation, subjects completed one test each of Topcon KR-800, and SmartEyes devices; Then, following the routine outpatient procedures of Wuhan Children's Hospital, the clinically required pupil dilation/ciliary muscle palsy was completed, followed by subjective refraction after pupil dilation. After meeting clinical examination requirements, each of the three devices underwent two independent tests to evaluate repeatability and consistency under dilated pupil conditions. No additional mydriatic drugs were used for research purposes.
Used to acquire objective optometric parameters, including refractive errors and corneal measurements, during the clinical evaluation and comparison protocol.
Used to acquire objective optometric parameters, including refractive errors and corneal measurements, during the clinical evaluation and comparison protocol.
Routine refractive examination
Follow-up visit group (Phase II)
Subjects may be selected from those willing to continue follow-up in the first phase, or from newly screened eligible subjects in the same outpatient setting. All cohort subjects completed baseline refraction and axial measurement, followed up at 3 months (and 6 months). To reduce the impact of inspection sequence, the first phase uses a pre-established random sequence or balanced rotation sequence for the three devices; The dilation subgroup should try to maintain the same device sequence for the same subject before and after dilation. Final subjective optometry is performed by an experienced optometrist, who must not view the results of SmartEyes, or KR-800 before recording the subjective refraction endpoint.
Used to acquire objective optometric parameters, including refractive errors and corneal measurements, during the clinical evaluation and comparison protocol.
Used to acquire objective optometric parameters, including refractive errors and corneal measurements, during the clinical evaluation and comparison protocol.
Routine refractive examination
FDA-certified equipment used for measuring the axial length

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Refractive Measurement Agreement and Repeatability across Subgroups
Délai: Phase I clinical evaluation (completed during the baseline outpatient examination sessions)

Evaluate the agreement between SmartEyes, Topcon KR-800, and subjective/cycloplegic reference refractions, as well as the independent measurement repeatability of each device, across both non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic subgroups.

Assess whether the optical eye relaxation function of SmartEyes yields refractive outcomes closer to subjective and cycloplegic references than conventional objective methods.

Phase I clinical evaluation (completed during the baseline outpatient examination sessions)

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Absolute axial length change measured by optical biometry
Délai: From baseline through the Phase II longitudinal follow-up period (6 months)
Absolute change in axial length (unit: mm) measured by optical biometry device.
From baseline through the Phase II longitudinal follow-up period (6 months)
Axial length growth rate measured by optical biometry
Délai: From baseline through the Phase II longitudinal follow-up period (6 months)
Axial length monthly growth rate (unit: mm/month), derived from serial axial-length measurements obtained by optical biometry device.
From baseline through the Phase II longitudinal follow-up period (6 months)
Correlation between fine-graded refractive change and absolute axial length change
Délai: From baseline through the Phase II longitudinal follow-up period (6 months)
Pearson correlation coefficient between fine-graded spherical equivalent change (SmartEyes autorefractor, diopter) and absolute axial-length change (optical biometry, mm).
From baseline through the Phase II longitudinal follow-up period (6 months)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Hong Jie, MD, Wuhan Children's Hospital affiliated with Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  • Chaise d'étude: Mingguang He, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

28 août 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

2 février 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

2 juin 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

21 août 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

2 septembre 2026

Première publication (Réel)

3 septembre 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

3 septembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

2 septembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 août 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • SE-202608

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Oui

produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner