Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Clinical Validation Study Protocol for SmartEyes Smart Optometry Measurement Device (Medical Device Clinical Validation Study) (CVSP-SOMD)

2 de septiembre de 2026 actualizado por: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Clinical Validation Study of SmartEyes Smart Optometry Measurement Instrument for Objective Refraction Agreement, Repeatability, Optical Eye Relaxation Function, and Refractive Fine-Scale Prediction of Axial Length Growth in Pediatric and Adolescent Outpatient Refraction Settings

This study aims to evaluate the SmartEyes smart refraction measurement device in two phases under real outpatient optometry room visits at Wuhan Children's Hospital. The first phase used a prospective, single-center, stratified paired cross-sectional clinical validation design, evaluating the consistency between SmartEyes, Topcon KR-800, and subjective refraction/post-dilation refraction results among outpatient children and adolescents without and those requiring dilation, and evaluating the repeatability of the three devices under corresponding conditions. The second phase added prospective cohort follow-up to explore the relationship between SmartEyes fine scale refractive data and axial length growth, evaluating whether these results better match or predict short-term axial growth trends than traditional 0.25D stepped objective refraction results.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

This prospective, single-center, non-interventional clinical validation study is designed to systematically evaluate the clinical performance, accuracy, repeatability, and functional utility of the SmartEyes optometric measurement device in pediatric and adolescent outpatient settings.

The study enrolls pediatric and adolescent subjects presenting for routine optometric examinations, covering a diverse spectrum of refractive statuses, including myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism. The research design is structured into distinct phases and cohorts to thoroughly assess device performance under varying physiological conditions:

Phase I (Cross-Sectional Evaluation): Subjects are allocated into two parallel subgroups based on clinical routine and requirements:

Non-Cycloplegic Subgroup: Subjects complete two independent measurements with each of the three devices (Topcon KR-800, and the SmartEyes device) within a single visit, followed by subjective refraction. Between consecutive measurements, subjects are required to leave the chin/forehead rest and reposition to verify device repeatability. SmartEyes outputs its refractive results after completing its built-in optical eye relaxation protocol.

Cycloplegic Subgroup: Subjects undergo one measurement with each of the three devices prior to cycloplegia. Following routine clinical cycloplegia/ciliary muscle paralysis and subsequent subjective refraction, subjects complete two additional independent measurements with each of the three devices to evaluate repeatability and agreement under cycloplegic conditions. (Note: No extra or study-mandated cycloplegic drugs are administered solely for research purposes).

Phase II (Follow-up Evaluation): Conducts longitudinal tracking and follow-up assessments to evaluate the ongoing stability and consistency of the measurement devices over time.

To thoroughly validate the device's diagnostic capabilities, the study focuses on primary evaluation dimensions including accuracy validation (assessing agreement of sphere, cylinder, axis, spherical equivalent, and corneal curvature via Bland-Altman analysis, ICC, and Pearson correlation), repeatability validation through consecutive independent scans, and the assessment of adaptive optical relaxation functions.

This study does not involve any investigational drugs, invasive procedures, or alterations to standard clinical care pathways. The generated data will establish robust clinical evidence supporting the device's accuracy and stability, while providing standardized datasets for the continuous optimization of artificial intelligence-driven optometric algorithms and smart assistance platforms.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Estimado)

200

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Jijing Li, MD, PhD
  • Número de teléfono: 027-83627088
  • Correo electrónico: jijing.li@cevr.hk

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

Pediatric and adolescent outpatients presenting for routine optometric examinations and refractive status evaluation at the clinical site.

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 6-17 years old, no gender limit;
  2. Visiting the outpatient optometry room of Wuhan Children's Hospital, clinically required refraction examination;
  3. Ability to cooperate in completing SmartEyes, Topcon KR-800, Topcon KR-1W examinations;
  4. Able to complete reliable subjective refraction;
  5. Subjects in the mydriasis subgroup should be those who need mydriasis/cycloplegia refraction for clinical diagnosis and treatment;
  6. Those who participate in the second phase cohort must be able to complete the axial length measurement and be willing to return to complete the 3-month (and 6-month) follow-up as planned;
  7. Guardians are fully informed and sign written informed consent;
  8. Subject children accept research notifications based on their age and understanding ability, and express agreement or no objection to participating in the research.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Those unable to maintain stable fixation, unable to cooperate with desktop equipment for examination, or unable to perform reliable subjective refraction;
  2. Obvious strabismus, nystagmus, severe amblyopia, or other conditions affecting the reliability of objective/subjective refraction;
  3. Keratoconus, obviously irregular astigmatism, corneal scarring, corneal edema, or other corneal diseases that significantly affect refractive measurement;
  4. Moderate to severe cataracts, obvious lens opacity, vitreous opacity, fundus diseases, and other conditions that may affect the refraction endpoint;
  5. History of previous corneal refractive surgery or intraocular surgery;
  6. Still wearing orthokeratology lenses, RGP, or other contact lenses on the day and determined by the investigator to affect measurement results;
  7. Participants in the second phase cohort who are unable to complete follow-up, plan to undergo eye surgery in the short term, or have investigators who judge axial measurement results to be clearly unreliable will not be included in the cohort follow-up analysis;
  8. Other circumstances where the investigator determines the participant is unsuitable for this study.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
No pupil dilation subgroup(Phase I)
No pupil dilation subgroup: Subjects completed two independent tests each of Topcon KR-800 and SmartEyes smart optometry devices during the same outpatient procedure, followed by subjective refraction. Between two independent tests, subjects were asked to leave the mandibular rest/forehead rest and reposition to verify the repeatability of each device. Each SmartEyes test outputs the refraction results after completing the device's built-in optical eye relaxation process.
Used to acquire objective optometric parameters, including refractive errors and corneal measurements, during the clinical evaluation and comparison protocol.
Used to acquire objective optometric parameters, including refractive errors and corneal measurements, during the clinical evaluation and comparison protocol.
Routine refractive examination
Required pupil dilation subgroup(Phase I)
Before pupil dilation, subjects completed one test each of Topcon KR-800, and SmartEyes devices; Then, following the routine outpatient procedures of Wuhan Children's Hospital, the clinically required pupil dilation/ciliary muscle palsy was completed, followed by subjective refraction after pupil dilation. After meeting clinical examination requirements, each of the three devices underwent two independent tests to evaluate repeatability and consistency under dilated pupil conditions. No additional mydriatic drugs were used for research purposes.
Used to acquire objective optometric parameters, including refractive errors and corneal measurements, during the clinical evaluation and comparison protocol.
Used to acquire objective optometric parameters, including refractive errors and corneal measurements, during the clinical evaluation and comparison protocol.
Routine refractive examination
Follow-up visit group (Phase II)
Subjects may be selected from those willing to continue follow-up in the first phase, or from newly screened eligible subjects in the same outpatient setting. All cohort subjects completed baseline refraction and axial measurement, followed up at 3 months (and 6 months). To reduce the impact of inspection sequence, the first phase uses a pre-established random sequence or balanced rotation sequence for the three devices; The dilation subgroup should try to maintain the same device sequence for the same subject before and after dilation. Final subjective optometry is performed by an experienced optometrist, who must not view the results of SmartEyes, or KR-800 before recording the subjective refraction endpoint.
Used to acquire objective optometric parameters, including refractive errors and corneal measurements, during the clinical evaluation and comparison protocol.
Used to acquire objective optometric parameters, including refractive errors and corneal measurements, during the clinical evaluation and comparison protocol.
Routine refractive examination
FDA-certified equipment used for measuring the axial length

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Refractive Measurement Agreement and Repeatability across Subgroups
Periodo de tiempo: Phase I clinical evaluation (completed during the baseline outpatient examination sessions)

Evaluate the agreement between SmartEyes, Topcon KR-800, and subjective/cycloplegic reference refractions, as well as the independent measurement repeatability of each device, across both non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic subgroups.

Assess whether the optical eye relaxation function of SmartEyes yields refractive outcomes closer to subjective and cycloplegic references than conventional objective methods.

Phase I clinical evaluation (completed during the baseline outpatient examination sessions)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Absolute axial length change measured by optical biometry
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline through the Phase II longitudinal follow-up period (6 months)
Absolute change in axial length (unit: mm) measured by optical biometry device.
From baseline through the Phase II longitudinal follow-up period (6 months)
Axial length growth rate measured by optical biometry
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline through the Phase II longitudinal follow-up period (6 months)
Axial length monthly growth rate (unit: mm/month), derived from serial axial-length measurements obtained by optical biometry device.
From baseline through the Phase II longitudinal follow-up period (6 months)
Correlation between fine-graded refractive change and absolute axial length change
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline through the Phase II longitudinal follow-up period (6 months)
Pearson correlation coefficient between fine-graded spherical equivalent change (SmartEyes autorefractor, diopter) and absolute axial-length change (optical biometry, mm).
From baseline through the Phase II longitudinal follow-up period (6 months)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Hong Jie, MD, Wuhan Children's Hospital affiliated with Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  • Silla de estudio: Mingguang He, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

28 de agosto de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

2 de febrero de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

2 de junio de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

21 de agosto de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de septiembre de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

3 de septiembre de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

3 de septiembre de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de septiembre de 2026

Última verificación

1 de agosto de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • SE-202608

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

Sí

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir