- ICH GCP
- Registre américain des essais cliniques
- Essai clinique NCT07804862
Efficacy and Safety of RFA vs MWA for Treatment of Large Benign Thyroid Nodules, RCT
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Large Benign Thyroid Nodules, a Randomized Controlled Trial
We conduct a multi-institutional randomized control trial of RFA and MWA for the primary treatment of large, benign nodules. Adult patients >/=18 years of age who have a solitary thyroid nodule ≥20ml in volume who presents to 1) Columbia University, NY or 2) Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong for consultation will be eligible for enrollment in the study. They will need either a) two benign fine needle biopsies, with the most recent biopsy performed within 1 year of enrollment in study or b) one benign fine needle biopsy and low suspicion characteristics on ultrasound. Both functional and non-functional nodules are eligible.
Patients will be randomly assigned to either treatment arm a) RFA or treatment arm b) MWA according to a pre-generated block randomization list.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Benign thyroid nodules can cause compressive symptoms for patients, including neck pressure and discomfort, dysphagia, dyspnea, and dysphonia. Some nodules will become autonomously functioning causing hyperthyroidism. Traditionally the gold standard treatment for these benign, but problematic nodules, has been thyroidectomy. Although generally a low risk operation, thyroidectomy is associated with some risk for recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, bleeding, infection, and need for thyroid hormone supplementation.
Introduced in the early 2000s, ultrasound-guided percutaneous ablation of thyroid lesions has emerged as a potential alternative to surgery in patients with benign thyroid nodules. Of the myriad ablation methods, the most commonly used technique are radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA). The two techniques used different mechanisms for heat generation.
Current evidence comparing RFA versus MWA for thyroid ablation were limited and were either retrospective or non-randomized, with focus mainly on small thyroid nodules of ≤10ml in volume. There is a lack of high quality evidence on the safety and efficacy of RFA versus MWA for the treatment of large thyroid nodules (≥20ml).
The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the safety and efficacy of RFA and MWA in the treatment of large, benign thyroid nodules.
The primary outcome of is the volume reduction rate at 6 months after ablation. The secondary outcomes include safety, complication rates and quality of life after both procedures.
Type d'étude
Inscription (Réel)
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Lieux d'étude
-
-
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Queen Mary Hospital
-
-
Critères de participation
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
Accepte les volontaires sains
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- who have a solitary thyroid nodule ≥20ml in volume
- two benign fine needle biopsies, with the most recent biopsy performed within 1 year of enrollment in study or one benign fine needle biopsy and low suspicion characteristics on ultrasound
- Both functional and non-functional nodules are eligible
Exclusion Criteria:
- have multiple nodules and planned simultaneous ablation
- cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules
- nodules with substernal extension or posterior extension that cannot be viewed sufficiently with ultrasound
- current pregnancy or cardiac arrhythmias
Plan d'étude
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Microwave ablation
Apply microwave ablation to those large benign thyroid nodules for shrinkage purpose |
Ultrasound-guided thermal ablation will be performed using ECO Medical internally cooled MWA antennas (16 or 17 gauge) powered by the ECO Medical generator in accordance with the trans-isthmic 'moving shot' technique.
Autres noms:
|
|
Expérimental: Radiofrequency ablation
Apply radiofrequency ablation to those large benign thyroid nodules for shrinkage purpose |
Ultrasound-guided thermal ablation will be performed using STARmed internally cooled RFA electrodes (18 gauge) powered by the VIVA RF generator in accordance with the trans-isthmic 'moving shot' technique.
Autres noms:
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Volume reduction rate (VRR) of thyroid nodule at 6 months (%)
Délai: 6 months
|
To measure the volume reduction rate (VRR) of thyroid nodule at 6-month. volume of nodule= length(cm) x width(cm) x depth(cm) x (π / 6 ) VRR = [(volume at baseline - volume at 6-month)/volume of baseline] x 100% |
6 months
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Volume reduction rate (VRR) of thyroid nodule at 12 months (%)
Délai: 12-months
|
To measure the volume reduction rate (VRR) of thyroid nodule at 12-month. volume of nodule= length(cm) x width(cm) x depth(cm) x (π / 6 ) VRR = [(volume at baseline - volume at 12-m / Volume at baseline] x 100% |
12-months
|
|
Changes in compressive symptom scores (0-100)
Délai: 12 months
|
To measure the changes in compressive symptoms scores. Compressive symptoms score is from 0 to 100. The higher score means more compressive symptom. |
12 months
|
|
Changes in cosmetic symptom scores (1-4)
Délai: 12 months
|
To assess the change of cosmetic symptom by experienced doctors until 12 months. Cosmetic symptoms is from 1 to 4 as below
|
12 months
|
|
Peri-operative pain scores (0-10)
Délai: 12 months
|
To measure the change in pain score before and after ablation. The pain score is from 0 to 10, the higher score means more painful. |
12 months
|
|
Complications from procedure including vocal cord palsy, bleeding, infection, nodule rupture, skin burn
Délai: 12 months
|
Description: To assess for any complications arising from procedure during follow-up period after ablation |
12 months
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
Parrainer
Collaborateurs
Publications et liens utiles
Publications générales
- Cheng Z, Che Y, Yu S, Wang S, Teng D, Xu H, Li J, Sun D, Han Z, Liang P. US-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency versus Microwave Ablation for Benign Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Multicenter Study. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 25;7(1):9554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09930-7.
- Wu W, Gong X, Zhou Q, Chen X, Chen X. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Solid Benign Thyroid Nodules: Comparison of MWA versus Control Group. Int J Endocrinol. 2017;2017:9724090. doi: 10.1155/2017/9724090. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
- He L, Zhao W, Xia Z, Su A, Li Z, Zhu J. Comparative efficacy of different ultrasound-guided ablation for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 20;16(1):e0243864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243864. eCollection 2021.
- Hu K, Wu J, Dong Y, Yan Z, Lu Z, Liu L. Comparison between ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency and microwave ablation in benign thyroid nodules. J Cancer Res Ther. 2019;15(7):1535-1540. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_322_19.
- Guo DM, Chen Z, Zhai YX, Su HH. Comparison of radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation for benign thyroid nodules: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2021 Jul;95(1):187-196. doi: 10.1111/cen.14438. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
- Jin H, Fan J, Lu L, Cui M. A Propensity Score Matching Study Between Microwave Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation in Terms of Safety and Efficacy for Benign Thyroid Nodules Treatment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 9;12:584972. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.584972. eCollection 2021.
- Kim JH, Baek JH, Lim HK, Ahn HS, Baek SM, Choi YJ, Choi YJ, Chung SR, Ha EJ, Hahn SY, Jung SL, Kim DS, Kim SJ, Kim YK, Lee CY, Lee JH, Lee KH, Lee YH, Park JS, Park H, Shin JH, Suh CH, Sung JY, Sim JS, Youn I, Choi M, Na DG; Guideline Committee for the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KSThR) and Korean Society of Radiology. 2017 Thyroid Radiofrequency Ablation Guideline: Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology. Korean J Radiol. 2018 Jul-Aug;19(4):632-655. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.632. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
- Huh JY, Baek JH, Choi H, Kim JK, Lee JH. Symptomatic benign thyroid nodules: efficacy of additional radiofrequency ablation treatment session--prospective randomized study. Radiology. 2012 Jun;263(3):909-16. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111300. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
- Lim HK, Lee JH, Ha EJ, Sung JY, Kim JK, Baek JH. Radiofrequency ablation of benign non-functioning thyroid nodules: 4-year follow-up results for 111 patients. Eur Radiol. 2013 Apr;23(4):1044-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2671-3. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
Achèvement primaire (Estimé)
Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Première publication (Réel)
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
Dernière vérification
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Mots clés
Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- UW 23-574
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
produit fabriqué et exporté des États-Unis.
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .