Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

AI Assistance for Detecting Active Bleeding During DSA Procedures

11 septembre 2026 mis à jour par: Jian Lu, Zhongda Hospital

Real-Time DSA-VDet Assistance for Detecting Active Bleeding Across Multiple Anatomical Regions: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label, Blinded-Endpoint Controlled Trial

Clinically, DSA-VDet can continuously indicate suspected bleeding regions throughout a complete angiographic sequence and provide a second-reader opinion to the operator. It is expected to reduce the time required for frame-by-frame review and localization of culprit vessels, reduce missed detection of small, multiple, or unusually located bleeding sites, and improve consistency among physicians with different levels of experience. Faster culprit-vessel localization may also reduce repeat angiography, radiation exposure, and unnecessary superselective catheterization. These potential benefits will be tested in the prospective randomized trial; the study does not assume that the model will necessarily improve clinical outcomes. From a translational perspective, the study will establish a standardized temporal DSA database spanning multiple centers, devices, and anatomical regions, together with bleeding-site annotation standards, a model suitable for real-time deployment, and a pathway for clinical evaluation. These resources may provide a reproducible technical foundation for regional collaboration in emergency interventional care and AI-assisted interpretation in lower-resource hospitals.

The core value of this study is therefore to address the 'single-region, weak-temporal, algorithm-centered, clinically under-evaluated' limitations of existing models. Using multicenter DSA videos from multiple anatomical regions, the study will leverage contrast kinetics and motion information to improve detection of small bleeding sites and will progress from retrospective validation through controlled physician interpretation to a prospective randomized trial, providing a continuous evaluation from technical performance to clinical benefit.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

1324

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

  • Chine
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, Chine, 213003
        • Zhongda hospital
        • Contact:

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18 years or older;
  • suspected acute active bleeding in an intracranial, solid-organ, pelvic, gastrointestinal, respiratory, great-vessel, or other relevant anatomical region requiring DSA-guided interventional diagnosis or treatment;
  • clinical suitability for the planned DSA procedure;
  • written informed consent from the patient or legally authorized representative before randomization whenever feasible, or eligibility for an ethics-approved deferred-consent pathway at an activated site when prior consent is impossible and treatment cannot be delayed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a history of severe allergic reaction to iodinated contrast medium or related medications that precludes the planned procedure;
  • severe coagulopathy or a platelet count below 50x10^9/L when interventional treatment is considered clinically inappropriate;
  • severe cardiac or pulmonary insufficiency that makes the planned procedure unsafe;
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  • severe renal insufficiency or another condition that may substantially increase interventional risk;
  • inability to complete angiography safely according to the required workflow despite clinically appropriate support;
  • any other circumstance that, in the investigator's judgment, makes participation unsuitable. Impaired decision-making capacity alone will not be an exclusion if consent can be obtained from a legally authorized representative or through the ethics-approved deferred-consent pathway.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: DSA-VDet-assisted group
During DSA acquisition, DSA-VDet v1.0 will perform continuous frame-by-frame inference and continuously display suspected bleeding regions, confidence scores, and relevant frame indices. The operator will retain responsibility for the final diagnosis, selection of culprit vessels, and all angiographic and embolization decisions.
Dispositif: DSA-VDet v1.0
During DSA acquisition, DSA-VDet v1.0 will perform continuous frame-by-frame inference and continuously display suspected bleeding regions, confidence scores, and relevant frame indices. The operator will retain responsibility for the final diagnosis, selection of culprit vessels, and all angiographic and embolization decisions.
Aucune intervention: Conventional-interpretation group
The operator will perform frame-by-frame interpretation using the conventional DSA equipment and established workflow, without access to DSA-VDet output. Images may undergo offline model analysis after completion of the index procedure for exploratory purposes, but those results must not be available for the index clinical decision.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
the time from the start of the first diagnostic DSA acquisition to achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint
Délai: Upon achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint, an average of 1 hour
To determine whether real-time DSA-VDet v1.0 assistance shortens the time from the start of the first diagnostic DSA acquisition to achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint, compared with conventional interpretation.
Upon achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint, an average of 1 hour

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
the detection and localization performance of DSA-VDet
Délai: Upon achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint, an average of 1 hour
To evaluate the detection and localization performance of DSA-VDet in DSA sequences acquired across multiple anatomical regions; to assess its effects on interpretation accuracy, interpretation time, and interobserver agreement among interventional physicians with different levels of experience; and to compare total procedure duration, technical embolization success, repeat angiographic acquisitions, radiation exposure, contrast-medium volume, intraprocedural complications, and adverse events through postprocedure day 30 between the randomized groups.
Upon achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint, an average of 1 hour
effects on interpretation accuracy
Délai: Upon achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint, an average of 1 hour
To evaluate the detection and localization performance of DSA-VDet in DSA sequences acquired across multiple anatomical regions; to assess its effects on interpretation accuracy, interpretation time, and interobserver agreement among interventional physicians with different levels of experience; and to compare total procedure duration, technical embolization success, repeat angiographic acquisitions, radiation exposure, contrast-medium volume, intraprocedural complications, and adverse events through postprocedure day 30 between the randomized groups.
Upon achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint, an average of 1 hour
interpretation time
Délai: Upon achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint, an average of 1 hour
To evaluate the detection and localization performance of DSA-VDet in DSA sequences acquired across multiple anatomical regions; to assess its effects on interpretation accuracy, interpretation time, and interobserver agreement among interventional physicians with different levels of experience; and to compare total procedure duration, technical embolization success, repeat angiographic acquisitions, radiation exposure, contrast-medium volume, intraprocedural complications, and adverse events through postprocedure day 30 between the randomized groups.
Upon achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint, an average of 1 hour
interobserver agreement among interventional physicians with different levels of experience
Délai: Upon achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint, an average of 1 hour
To evaluate the detection and localization performance of DSA-VDet in DSA sequences acquired across multiple anatomical regions; to assess its effects on interpretation accuracy, interpretation time, and interobserver agreement among interventional physicians with different levels of experience; and to compare total procedure duration, technical embolization success, repeat angiographic acquisitions, radiation exposure, contrast-medium volume, intraprocedural complications, and adverse events through postprocedure day 30 between the randomized groups.
Upon achievement of the correct diagnostic endpoint, an average of 1 hour

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Zhongda Hospital

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 octobre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 octobre 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

30 décembre 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

2 septembre 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

11 septembre 2026

Première publication (Réel)

17 septembre 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

17 septembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

11 septembre 2026

Dernière vérification

1 septembre 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • DSA-VDet

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner