Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Efficacy of Fascia Iliaca Block Versus Intraoperative Nerve Infiltration During Anterior Hip Replacement Surgery

23 agosto 2017 aggiornato da: Randy Fayne, DO
Surgical trauma causes nerve sensitization leading to amplification and prolongation of postoperative pain. In experimental studies, pre-injury neural blockade using local anesthetics has been shown to reduce post-injury sensitization of the central nervous system, while similar techniques applied after the injury had less or no effect (FILOS). Investigators have therefore designed this study to examine the timing of FICB (pre-operatively versus intra-operatively) on postoperative pain in patients undergoing anterior hip replacement surgery.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Though still uncommonly used in the United States, the popularity of the anterior approach for total hip replacement is rapidly growing because of its clinical advantages. Rehabilitation is simplified and accelerated, dislocation risk is reduced, leg length is more accurately controlled, and incision is smaller than with traditional approaches (GOEBEL). Nevertheless, although pain is lessened, it is still considerable, and new techniques have been developed to improve postoperative pain control for this procedure.

Surgical incision and tissue trauma result in postoperative pain. Regional pain blocks, especially when done under ultrasound guidance, have proven to be extremely effective at reducing postoperative pain and improving patient satisfaction. One such block, the fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB), has been shown to be effective in controlling pain associated with surgery involving the hip and femur.

Although possible without ultrasound guidance, using this technique allows for identification of specific tissue planes and precise placement of medication near the nerves responsible for postoperative pain. Using ultrasound, the superficial fascial layer of the iliopsoas muscle is identified at the anterior edge of the ilium, and a needle is placed just beneath that fascia. A high volume of local anesthetic is then injected under ultrasound guidance, ensuring cephalad spread of medication, in an attempt to provide anesthesia of the lateral femoral cutaneous, femoral and obturator nerves.

Unlike other approaches to hip replacement, anterior repair allows for direct visualization of the fascial layers described above. This allows for direct injection of local anesthetic beneath this fascia, potentially obviating the need for preoperatively performed, ultrasound guided, FICB. The primary differences in approach (ultrasound guided preop versus direct visualization intraop) is the timing of injection, and it is unclear if nerve block prior to or after tissue damage affects postoperative pain in these patients.

Surgical trauma causes nerve sensitization leading to amplification and prolongation of postoperative pain. In experimental studies, pre-injury neural blockade using local anesthetics has been shown to reduce post-injury sensitization of the central nervous system, while similar techniques applied after the injury had less or no effect (FILOS). Investigators have therefore designed this study to examine the timing of FICB (pre-operatively versus intra-operatively) on postoperative pain in patients undergoing anterior hip replacement surgery.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

50

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • Michigan
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, Stati Uniti, 48073
        • Beaumont Health System

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

Da 18 anni a 65 anni (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults 18-65 years of age
  • Female patients must be surgically sterile, postmenopausal or have a negative pregnancy test on the day of surgery
  • Willing and able to sign the informed consent approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB)
  • Willing and able to complete the study procedures and pain scales, and to communicate meaningfully in English with study personnel
  • Elective anterior hip replacement to be performed at Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification 1, 2, and 3 (patients that have either no systemic illness, or mild to moderate systemic disease, eg. asthma, diabetes or hypertension)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of allergy to study medications including ropivacaine and other local anesthetic agents of the amide-type
  • Enrollment in concurrent research study
  • Female patients who are pregnant or lactating, or who have a positive urine pregnancy test
  • Opioid tolerant, ie, A patient taking a narcotic > 30mg per day morphine equivalent. (Source: www.globalrph.com/narcotic.cgi) for pain in the 2 months prior to surgery
  • A medical condition that in the investigator's opinion could adversely impact the patient's participation or safety, conducts of the study, or interferes with the pain assessments
  • Previous hip arthroplasty (partial or total) of the index hip
  • History of illicit drug use, or prescription medicine or alcohol abuse within the past 2 years

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Pre-operative Ultrasound FICB Group
Enrolled subjects will receive FICB with 50cc of 0.3% ropivacaine. Blocks will be performed under an ultrasound guidance device with an in-plane technique by a single study investigator, in the preoperative area.
Enrolled subjects will receive FICB with 50cc of 0.3% ropivacaine. Blocks will be performed under ultrasound guidance with an in-plane technique by a single study investigator in the preoperative area. Although possible without ultrasound guidance, using this technique allows for identification of specific tissue planes and precise placement of medication near the nerves responsible for postoperative pain. Using ultrasound, the superficial fascial layer of the iliopsoas muscle is identified at the anterior edge of the ilium, and a needle is placed just beneath that fascia. A high volume of local anesthetic is then injected under ultrasound guidance, ensuring cephalad spread of medication in an attempt to provide anesthesia of the lateral femoral cutaneous, femoral and obturator nerves.
Comparatore attivo: Intra-operative FICB Group
Enrolled subjects will receive FICB with 50cc of 0.3% ropivacaine. Blocks will be performed intra-operatively under direct surgeon visualization, in the operating room.
Enrolled subjects will receive FICB with 50cc of 0.3% ropivacaine. Blocks will be performed intra-operatively under direct surgeon visualization, in the operating room. Unlike other approaches to hip replacement, anterior repair allows for direct visualization of the fascial layers described above. This allows for direct injection of local anesthetic beneath this fascia, potentially obviating the need for preoperatively performed, ultrasound guided, FICB.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Postoperative Pain During PACU Admission
Lasso di tempo: From time of PACU admission until discharge from PACU, an average of 2 hours

Pain assessments will be made by the subject using a 10.0 cm Visual-Analog scale (VAS) (scale 1-100 where 1=minimal pain and 100= worst pain imaginable) as follows at each time point:

  • Baseline assessment in Preoperative area
  • Upon arrival to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU)
  • Every 15 min (+/- 2 minutes) thereafter and prior to any request for pain medication until PACU discharge All pain scores per subject from the time of PACU admission until discharge from PACU will be averaged to obtain one data point per subject.
From time of PACU admission until discharge from PACU, an average of 2 hours
Postoperative Pain During Recovery
Lasso di tempo: From discharge from PACU until discharge from hospital, an average of 2-3 days
Pain assessments were made by the subject using a 10.0 cm VAS (scale 1-100 where 1=minimal pain and 100= worst pain imaginable) prior to any request for pain medication. Up to 40 values per patient were averaged.
From discharge from PACU until discharge from hospital, an average of 2-3 days

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Incidence of Adverse Events
Lasso di tempo: From the signature on the informed consent document for the duration of the hospital stay, an expected average of 2 - 3 days.
Measure is count of participants experiencing any adverse event. Adverse events will be reported by the patient (or when appropriate, staff personnel) during hospitalization.
From the signature on the informed consent document for the duration of the hospital stay, an expected average of 2 - 3 days.
Patient Satisfaction With Postoperative Pain Control
Lasso di tempo: At the 3 week post-op visit
Patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control, using a 10 point Likert scale where 1=extremely dissatisfied and 10= extremely satisfied. Patients were called 3 weeks post-op to determine pain control satisfaction.
At the 3 week post-op visit

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Randy Fayne, DO, Beaumont Health System

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio

1 agosto 2012

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 giugno 2014

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 gennaio 2015

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

23 agosto 2012

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

21 settembre 2012

Primo Inserito (Stima)

26 settembre 2012

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

15 febbraio 2018

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

23 agosto 2017

Ultimo verificato

1 agosto 2017

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

prodotto fabbricato ed esportato dagli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi