- ICH GCP
- Registro degli studi clinici negli Stati Uniti
- Sperimentazione clinica NCT04659395
How to Develop a Training Program for Nurses in Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Block
How to Develop a Training Program for Nurses in Ultrasound Guided Femoral - a Methodology Study
In this study the intervention consists of a one-day-training program for nurses and three supervised ultrasound guided femoral nerve block (UGFNB) per registered nurse.
The training consists of an instruction movie, one-day on-site-simulation and practical examination. The nurses are watching an instruction video and review current local guidelines for UGFNB in advance. The one-day training is situated in a simulation center and consists of theoretical and practical training divided into; infection prevention, anatomy, use of ultrasound and prevention and treatment of complications. A ultrasound model (Gen II Femoral Vascular Access and Regional Anesthesia Ultrasound Training Model) and a living human model is used to examine the femoral nerve and the neighboring structures using ultrasound. At the end of the one-day course, the nurses attends a practical examination with the researchers and anesthesiologists observing, to assure that they could perform the UGFNB procedure correctly. To pass the exam and be able to move on to the supervised blocks in real patients, there has to be a consensus between the researchers and anesthesiologist that they had sufficient knowledge and practical skills. 1) Sterile procedure 2) Management of the ultrasound machine and oral description of the anatomic surroundings in the groin area 3) Preparation of the local anesthetics and performance of an UGFNB. They also have to do an oral presentation in how they would perform a cardiopulmonary resuscitation procedure and how to manage complications / toxic reactions. Approved exam required at least seven points. This study will explore if a one-day course as described above is adequate, sufficient and maintains the safety framework of performing UGFNB in nurses
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Intervento / Trattamento
Descrizione dettagliata
Acute pain is a common reason for patients admitted to Emergency Departments (ED) . Globally over 1 million hip fractures occur yearly , a trauma that is close related with acute distinct pain in the proximal part of the affected extremity. Experiencing severe pain is associated with increased length of stay, higher risk of delirium, movement restriction, difficulties with mobilization and reduced health related quality of life. There is considerable research regarding patients' satisfaction with their ED experiences. These studies indicate that patient dissatisfaction with the stay at ED has been an international challenge over several years . Disapproval such as; pain management , but also limited information on potential latency before further treatment and poor explanation about the causes and treatment of the condition is prominent.
Pain control can be difficult , and often requires advanced nursing and physician care due to co-morbidity . Inadequate analgesia appear to be risk factors for delirium in frail older adults, and research indicates that total avoiding opioids or using very low or high doses of opioids may increase the risk of delirium. Therefore, optimizing acute pain management is important. Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve block (UGFNB) performed in hip fracture patients is a valuable alternative to systemic analgesic, as it provides analgesia to the fractured area, thereby facilitating reduction in opioid administration. Traditionally, an UGFNB is performed by an anesthesiologist. Recently, several examples of task shifting from physicians to nurses are described with no significant difference in successful treatment results with equal patients satisfaction and safety as physician performed procedures. Task shifting approach is endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in order to make more efficient use of the available human resource of health. A recent report from the European Union (EU) states that implementation of task shifting has been rarely evaluated and limited documented. Therefore, we need studies to examine the methodology in how we can train nurses in the ED to take more responsibility for assessing and treating patients.
In the study we aime to;
- describe a methodology for a training course for nurse led UGFNB.
- evaluate if the training process resulted in a safe and successful UGFNB.
Data which will be collected are
- ASA classification (ASA Physical Status Classification System )
- Length of stay
Morbidity
- Hospital acquired pneumonia
- Acute myocardial infarction (AMI)
- Acute renal failure
- Respiratory failure
Complication rate, number of;
- intravasal injection - visually + circulatory and neurological symptoms
- hematoma - defined as a new tumor > 2 cm in the groin / injection site measured by ultrasound
- Neurologic systemic outcomes / symptoms / paresthesia that have occurred after admission and which persist until discharge.
- Allergic reaction
- Number of total morphine equivalents, mg (iv/po) administered prehospital and during Emergency Department stay
- Patients physical characteristic (physical examination; gender, age, height, weight, , blood pressure, heart rate, SpO2 (oxygen saturation) and use of oxygen will be noted together with current disease
A short, but personal interview with the patients having received an UGFNB by a study nurse can describe both the service received and the patient's experience with it. The interviews will be performed after the patient has been relieved of pain. The PhD (Philosophiae Doctor)-candidate, not the study nurse having performed the nerve block, will conduct the interviews. The patients will be asked whether the nerve block relieved them of pain, how they experienced the procedure and the fact that it was performed by a nurse had any relevance. Also, the PhD-candidate will interview the patient at a later point during the hospital stay for a second time to compare the answers
The study nurses and the anesthesiologists that has supervised the nurses will be presented with a questionnaire after each UGFNB conducted. The PhD-candidate will hand out the questionnaire immediately after the FNB is conducted by a study nurse. The items in the questionnaire include feasibility and success of the procedure and are identical for nurses and anesthesiologists.
Finally, each study nurse will do three UGFNB with supervision by an anesthesiologist before we start inclusion in a later randomized controlled trial. Five study nurses will be included and fifteen patients.
The inclusion criteria for patients will be:
- Patients arriving at the ED diagnosed with a hip fracture (radiological confirmed)
- ASA- classification 1-4
- Written and verbal informed consent by patient
Exclusion criteria for patients will be:
- Patients with; dementia, without ability to give informed consent and other cognitively challenges needed to participate in this study (at the discretion of the study nurse)
- Known allergies to local anesthetic (Ropivacaine) used in UGFNB
- Use of anticoagulants or platelet inhibitors. Acetylsalicylic acid and dipyridamole is allowed. If a recent (last 2 hours) INR( international normalized ratio) is below <1.5 the patient can be included.
- Pregnant
- Age <18 years
- Severe head injury which leads to significant loss of consciousness (GCS <12)
- >10 mg or more morphine administrated pre-hospital
- Skin lesions/infection at presumed block site
- Patients admitted with other suspected or verified fractures, except small fractures in hands and foots.
Verbal and written informed consent The study nurses will inform the patients by oral and written information and inclusion and intervention of the patient will start after written consent.
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
Fase
- Non applicabile
Contatti e Sedi
Luoghi di studio
-
-
-
Tønsberg, Norvegia, 3103
- Vestfold Hospital Trust
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
- Bambino
- Adulto
- Adulto più anziano
Accetta volontari sani
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Registered nurses or registered nurses with continuing education in acute nursing or geriatrics
- The nurses need to be aware that it will increase the workload in beginning of the project.
- Registered nurse has to be senior staff experienced i.e. worked in the ED
- Motivated to take on a new task in the ED
- Certificated in advanced CPR
- Familiar with routines in the ED and the relevant patient group
- They must be willing to be a part of this project for approximately 12 months.
- Working at least 75%.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refuse to participate
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Ricerca sui servizi sanitari
- Assegnazione: N / A
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione di gruppo singolo
- Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Altro: Emergency nurses
Emergency nurses who are trained in an one-day course
|
Emergency nurses who are trained for one-day in ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Cumulative Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement at 120 minutes after start of procedure, measured by 5 timepoints
Lasso di tempo: 120 minutes
|
Cumulative Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED at 120 minutes after admission, measured by five time Points; At the end of procedure, 30 min.-,
60 min.-,
90 min.-
and 120 min after start of procedure.
NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
|
120 minutes
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Ematoma
Lasso di tempo: 24 ore
|
Ematoma - definito come un nuovo tumore > 2 centimetri nell'inguine / sito di iniezione misurato mediante ultrasuoni, sì o no
|
24 ore
|
|
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement at baseline
Lasso di tempo: At baseline (timepoint 0)
|
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED at baseline (inclution of patient) NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
|
At baseline (timepoint 0)
|
|
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement after 30 minutes
Lasso di tempo: After 30 minutes from baseline
|
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED after 30 minutes from baseline NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
|
After 30 minutes from baseline
|
|
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement after 60 minutes
Lasso di tempo: After 60 minutes from baseline
|
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED after 60 minutes from baseline NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
|
After 60 minutes from baseline
|
|
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement after 90 minutes
Lasso di tempo: After 90 minutes from baseline
|
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED after 90 minutes from baseline NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
|
After 90 minutes from baseline
|
|
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement after 120 minutes
Lasso di tempo: After 120 minutes from baseline
|
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED after 120 minutes from baseline NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
|
After 120 minutes from baseline
|
|
Intravasal injection
Lasso di tempo: 24 hours
|
Intravasal injection - visually + circulatory and neurological symptoms, yes or no
|
24 hours
|
|
Patient experience- description of pain
Lasso di tempo: 24 hours
|
Patient experience of pain- During rest and motion measured by a 1-5 scale
|
24 hours
|
|
Patient satisfaction- waiting time to pain relief
Lasso di tempo: 24 hours
|
Patiens experiences on waiting time to pain relief measured in a scale form 1-5
|
24 hours
|
|
Patient satisfaction- information
Lasso di tempo: 24 hours
|
Patient experiences on information measured in a scale form 1-5
|
24 hours
|
|
Patient satisfaction- description of pain before the procedure
Lasso di tempo: 24 hours
|
Patient experience on pre-procedure pain measured by 1-5 scale
|
24 hours
|
|
Patient satisfaction- description of pain after the procedure
Lasso di tempo: 24 hours
|
Patient satisfaction- description of pain after the procedure measured by 1-5 scale
|
24 hours
|
|
Patient satisfaction- safety
Lasso di tempo: 24 hours
|
Patient satisfaction- description of patient reported feeling of safety during nurse led procedure measured by a 1-5 scale
|
24 hours
|
|
Patient satisfaction-effect of procedure
Lasso di tempo: 24 hours
|
Patient satisfaction regarding reduction of pain after the procedure measured by a 1-5 scale
|
24 hours
|
|
Patient satisfaction-hearing status
Lasso di tempo: 24 hours
|
Patient satisfaction hearing status measured by a 1-4 scale
|
24 hours
|
|
Self reported-registered nurse- complexity
Lasso di tempo: approximately 2 hours
|
Complexity of procedure measured by scale 1-5
|
approximately 2 hours
|
|
Self reported-registered nurse-success
Lasso di tempo: approximately 2 hours
|
Success of procedure measured by 1-5 scale
|
approximately 2 hours
|
|
Self reported-registered nurse-Recognition of anatomic structures
Lasso di tempo: approximately 2 hours
|
Recognition of anatomic structures at ultrasound, measured by a 1-4
|
approximately 2 hours
|
|
Self reported-registred nurse-spread of anesthesia
Lasso di tempo: approximately 2 hours
|
Spread of anesthesia, measured by a 1-4 scale
|
approximately 2 hours
|
|
Self reported-registered nurse- patient benefit from procedure
Lasso di tempo: approximately 2 hours
|
Patient benefit of procedure measured by a 1-5 scale
|
approximately 2 hours
|
|
Self reported-Anesthesiologist-complexity
Lasso di tempo: approximately 2 hours
|
Complexity of procedure measured by scale 1-5
|
approximately 2 hours
|
|
Self reported-Anesthesiologist-success
Lasso di tempo: approximately 2 hours
|
Success of procedure measured by a 1-5 scale
|
approximately 2 hours
|
|
Self reported-Anesthesiologist-Recognition of anatomic structures
Lasso di tempo: approximately 2 hours
|
Recognition of anatomic structures at ultrasound measured by a 1-4 scale
|
approximately 2 hours
|
|
Self reported-Anesthesiologist-spread of anesthesia
Lasso di tempo: approximately 2 hours
|
Spread of anesthesia, measured by a 1-4 scale
|
approximately 2 hours
|
|
Self reported-Anesthesiologist-Patient benefit of procedure
Lasso di tempo: approxemitely 2 hours
|
Patient benefit of procedure measured by a 1-5 scale
|
approxemitely 2 hours
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Sponsor
Collaboratori
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Elin Saga, nurse, The Hospital of Vestfold
Pubblicazioni e link utili
Pubblicazioni generali
- Ketelaars R, Stollman JT, van Eeten E, Eikendal T, Bruhn J, van Geffen GJ. Emergency physician-performed ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in proximal femoral fractures provide safe and effective pain relief: a prospective observational study in The Netherlands. Int J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar 2;11(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12245-018-0173-z.
- Dochez E, van Geffen GJ, Bruhn J, Hoogerwerf N, van de Pas H, Scheffer G. Prehospital administered fascia iliaca compartment block by emergency medical service nurses, a feasibility study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014 Jun 23;22:38. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-22-38.
- Mandy, L. . Nurse-led femoral nerve service for patients with fractured neck of femur. Advanced Nursing Practice in Pain Management. C. E. e. al., John wiley and sons: (2009)16.
- Layzell M. Nurse-led femoral nerve block service for patients with fractured neck of femur. 2010 05.02.18. In: Advancing nursing practice in pain management [Internet]. Chichester, West Sussex; Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Pub.; [16]
- WHO (2008). Task Shifting - Global Recommendations and Guidelines. WHO. Geneva, Switzerland., WHO Document Production Services: 96.
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- 533039
Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)
Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?
Descrizione del piano IPD
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .