Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Comparing the Effects of Macquarie Injury Management Group Protocol and Targeted Knee Exercise Program on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Patients With Grade II Knee Osteoarthritis

12 maggio 2026 aggiornato da: Muhammd zain ul bashir, Green International University

Comparative Effects of Macquarie Injury Management Group Protocol and Targeted Knee Exercise Program on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Patients With Grade II Knee Osteoarthritis

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the macquire injury management group protocol and targeted knee exercise program works to treat knee osteoarthritis grade 2.This clinical trial compares the effects of macquire injury management group protocol and targeted knee exercise program on pain and range of motion and functional disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis grade 2.Adults with knee osteoarthritis grade 2 were included in this study. A total of 84 participants were divided into two groups with 42 patients in each group.

One group received macquire injury management group protocol and the other group received targeted knee exercise program. Pain was assessed using the numeric pain rating scale and functional disability was measured using WOMAC index. Range of motion was also evaluated before and after treatment by universal goniometer.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Osteoarthritis (OA), the most prevalent type of arthritis, is the foremost cause of disability. Knee OA mainly affects the synovial membrane, bones, and cartilage of the joint. The synovial membrane is a smooth lining that protects the joint. Conservative management through manual therapy is widely used, but comparative effectiveness of different techniques remains unclear. This randomized clinical trial was designed to compare the effects of macquire injury management group protocol and targeted knee exercise program on pain and range of motion and functional disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis grade 2.A total of 84 participants diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis grade 2 were recruited . All the screened and willing participants were randomly allocated to two groups by lottery method with 42 patients in each group. (Group A: Experimental group /MIMG group, Group B: Comparative Group / CK group) .Group A received macquire injury management group protocol . The MIMG Knee Protocol is known for its emphasis on soft tissue mobilization. The patients were made to lie down in a supine position and their knee joints were in an extended position during the treatment. In order to perform the soft tissue mobilization, the physiotherapist gently worked on the soft tissues of the knee joint for about two to three minutes using both his hands. In addition to the manual treatment method, the patients also underwent 45 minutes of physical therapy exercises . Group B received targeted knee exercise program , was aimed at improving the strength, proprioception, and stability of the knee joint. It comprised of progressively increasing knee exercises for the quadriceps (for example, straight leg raises and terminal knee extensions), hip abductors, and hamstrings. In addition to these exercises, there were also exercises to increase the stability of the joint by means of proprioceptive exercises involving single leg standing and dynamic stability exercises. Functional exercises including sit-to-stand and step up were also included. The intervention period lasted for 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and post-intervention.

Pain was assessed using the numeric pain rating scale and functional disability was measured using WOMAC index. Range of motion was also evaluated before and after treatment by universal goniometer. The primary objective of this study is To determine the effects of Macquire Injury Management Group protocol and Targeted Knee Exercise Program on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Patients with Grade II Knee Osteoarthritis. The findings will help clinicians select the most effective manual therapy approach for managing Grade II Knee Osteoarthritis.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

84

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • Punjab Province
      • Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 54000
        • Johar pain relief center ,Lahore

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Both female and male subjects aged between 40 to 60 year
  2. Diagnosed knee osteoarthritis, Grade II by Kellegren Lawrence.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any surgical procedure done for lower extremity
  2. Any infection
  3. Post traumatic knee stiffness
  4. Secondary knee osteoarthritis
  5. Peripheral vascular disease.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Doppio

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: macquire injury management group Protocol (MIMG )
The macquire injury management group Protocol is known for its emphasis on soft tissue mobilization. The patients were made to lie down in a supine position and their knee joints were in an extended position during the treatment. In order to perform the soft tissue mobilization, the physiotherapist gently worked on the soft tissues of the knee joint for about two to three minutes using both his hands. In addition to the manual treatment method, the patients also underwent 45 minutes of physical therapy exercises
The patients were made to lie down in a supine position and their knee joints were in an extended position during the treatment. In order to perform the soft tissue mobilization, the physiotherapist gently worked on the soft tissues of the knee joint for about two to three minutes using both his hands. In addition to the manual treatment method, the patients also underwent 45 minutes of physical therapy exercises
Comparatore attivo: Targeted knee exercise program
targeted knee exercise program , was aimed at improving the strength, proprioception, and stability of the knee joint. It comprised of progressively increasing knee exercises for the quadriceps (for example, straight leg raises and terminal knee extensions), hip abductors, and hamstrings. In addition to these exercises, there were also exercises to increase the stability of the joint by means of proprioceptive exercises involving single leg standing and dynamic stability exercises. Functional exercises including sit-to-stand and step up were also included. The intervention period lasted for 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week.
It comprised of progressively increasing knee exercises for the quadriceps (for example, straight leg raises and terminal knee extensions), hip abductors, and hamstrings. In addition to these exercises, there were also exercises to increase the stability of the joint by means of proprioceptive exercises involving single leg standing and dynamic stability exercises. Functional exercises including sit-to-stand and step up were also included. The intervention period lasted for 12 weeks with 3 sessions per week.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Pain by numeric pain rating scale
Lasso di tempo: Baseline , 6th week and 12th week post intervention
The level of pain was assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), which is a simple and widely used tool for evaluating pain intensity. In this scale, individuals are asked to rate their pain on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain. Based on the categorization by Fiddiyanti et al. (2024), pain scores ranging from 1-3 are considered mild pain, 4-6 indicate moderate pain, and 7-10 represent severe pain. This scale provides a quick and reliable measure of a person's subjective pain experience.
Baseline , 6th week and 12th week post intervention

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Range of motion by universal goniometer
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 6th week and 12th week post intervention.
Range of motion was measured by Universal goniometer (UG) is commonly used as a standard method to evaluate Range of motion (ROM) as part of joint motions.
Baseline, 6th week and 12th week post intervention.
Functional disability by WOMAC index
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 6th week and 12th week post intervention.
Functional disability was measured by WOMAC index, is a scale consisting of 24 items in 3 domains. Pain- 5 items, Stiffness -2 items, Physical function- 17 items. Total score ranges from 0 to 96. Each item is scored 0(none), 1(mild), 2(moderate), 3(severe) and 4(extreme). Average of the score is obtained by dividing the total score with 96 and multiplying with 100.
Baseline, 6th week and 12th week post intervention.

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

28 aprile 2025

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

29 aprile 2026

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

4 maggio 2026

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

12 maggio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

12 maggio 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

18 maggio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

18 maggio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

12 maggio 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 maggio 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

SÌ

Descrizione del piano IPD

Only IPD used in the results publication will be shared.

Periodo di condivisione IPD

It will be available after completion of study.

Criteri di accesso alla condivisione IPD

Data requests should be sent to the corresponding author. Access will be granted to qualified researchers for approved research proposals. Data will be de-identified before sharing.

Tipo di informazioni di supporto alla condivisione IPD

  • STUDIO_PROTOCOLLO
  • LINFA
  • ICF
  • RSI

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi