Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Dural Puncture Epidural (DPE) Technique: Efficacy and Safety Overview.

17 luglio 2026 aggiornato da: Goran Ristev, Ohio State University

Neuraxial techniques such as lumbar epidural and combined spinal-epidural (CSE) are the most effective methods for labor analgesia and are associated with high patient satisfaction. However, standard epidurals can have failure rates and may be difficult to reliably confirm correct placement.

The dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique has been introduced to improve confirmation of epidural placement and potentially enhance analgesia. It involves identifying the epidural space, puncturing the dura with a spinal needle without injecting medication, confirming cerebrospinal fluid flow, and then placing the epidural catheter. While DPE may improve analgesia and drug spread, current evidence is limited and does not clearly demonstrate superiority over standard epidural techniques.

At The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center, DPE is used routinely for labor epidurals. This observational study evaluates epidural failure rates and anesthesia provider confidence in performing DPE, while also collecting procedural details, patient characteristics, analgesic outcomes, and complications. Provider confidence is assessed using a 3-point scale along with factors influencing performance, and patient outcomes include pain relief, need for rescue dosing, and overall epidural effectiveness.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Reclutamento

Descrizione dettagliata

This is a single-center, prospective observational study conducted at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique for labor analgesia.

Neuraxial analgesia is the gold standard for pain relief during labor, with conventional epidural (CE) and combined spinal-epidural (CSE) being the most commonly used techniques. The DPE technique is a modification of the CSE approach in which the dura is intentionally punctured with a spinal needle to confirm correct epidural needle placement through visualization of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), but no medication is injected into the intrathecal space. This approach is thought to improve epidural placement accuracy, enhance analgesia, and reduce epidural failure while maintaining the safety profile of a conventional epidural. Although DPE has gained widespread clinical use, current evidence regarding its superiority over conventional epidural techniques remains limited and inconsistent.

The primary objective of the study is to determine the success rate of the DPE technique, defined by successful visualization of CSF following dural puncture. Secondary objectives include evaluating epidural success following successful and unsuccessful DPE, anesthesia provider confidence before and after the procedure, labor analgesia effectiveness, maternal satisfaction with pain management, need for rescue analgesia, delivery outcomes, neonatal outcomes (Apgar scores and NICU admission), and procedure-related complications.

The study will enroll approximately 150 term pregnant patients requesting labor epidural analgesia and anesthesia care providers with prior epidural experience. Since DPE is already the institutional standard of care, participation in the study does not alter patient management. Instead, data are collected prospectively from routine clinical care, while participating anesthesia providers complete brief surveys assessing their confidence, procedural details, and technical success.

Clinical data collected include maternal demographics, obstetric characteristics, labor analgesia outcomes, epidural performance measures, rescue analgesia requirements, delivery mode, neonatal outcomes, and complications such as post-dural puncture headache, unilateral block, accidental dural puncture, catheter-related issues, or persistent neurologic symptoms. Epidural success is defined by adequate pain relief (pain score ≤3) and appropriate bilateral sensory blockade within 20 minutes after the loading dose.

Descriptive statistics will summarize patient and procedural characteristics, while comparative analyses will evaluate differences in outcomes between successful and unsuccessful DPE procedures. Overall, this study aims to better characterize the clinical performance of the DPE technique, determine its impact on epidural success and patient outcomes, and assess anesthesia provider confidence in performing the procedure under routine clinical practice.

Tipo di studio

Osservativo

Iscrizione (Stimato)

150

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Luoghi di studio

    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, Stati Uniti, 43201
        • Reclutamento
        • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Hospitals
        • Contatto:
          • Goran Ristev

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

N/A

Metodo di campionamento

Campione non probabilistico

Popolazione di studio

The study population consists of adult parturient women at term (37-42 weeks gestation) with singleton, vertex-presenting fetuses who request labor epidural analgesia at The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center. Eligible participants include patients with intact membranes or rupture of membranes within 6 hours who provide informed consent. The study also includes anesthesia care providers performing the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique as part of routine clinical care. Patients with contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia, chronic pain management, spinal abnormalities or prior spine surgery, infection, or other exclusion criteria will be excluded.

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • o Women with a single vertex presentation fetus at term (37-42 weeks) with intact fetal membranes or membrane rupture <6 hours previously, who request to have an epidural for labor analgesia and provide written consent for the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • o Patients being treated/managed for chronic pain.

    • Allergies or significant adverse reactions to local anesthetic or opioid medications
    • Contraindication to labor epidural placement
    • Patients with history of spine abnormalities or spine surgery.
    • Prisoners
    • Clinical signs or symptoms of infection.
    • Non-English speakers.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

Coorti e interventi

Gruppo / Coorte
Intervento / Trattamento
Dural Puncture Epidural (DPE) Cohort
All eligible anesthesia care providers and laboring patients receiving the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique as part of routine clinical care at The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center. Outcomes include epidural success/failure, procedural characteristics, and provider confidence.
All eligible anesthesia care providers and laboring patients receiving the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique as part of routine clinical care at The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center. Outcomes include epidural success/failure, procedural characteristics, and provider confidence.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Success rate of dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique (CSF backflow)
Lasso di tempo: During epidural placement procedure (at time of dural puncture)
To determine the proportion of parturient patients in whom successful dural puncture epidural (DPE) is achieved, defined as the presence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) backflow following intentional dural puncture using a spinal needle during epidural placement.
During epidural placement procedure (at time of dural puncture)

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Provider confidence score before and after DPE
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (immediately before epidural placement) and immediately after completion of the DPE procedure.
Anesthesia provider confidence rated on a 3-point scale (1 = not confident, 2 = somewhat confident, 3 = very confident)
Baseline (immediately before epidural placement) and immediately after completion of the DPE procedure.
Epidural analgesia success rate
Lasso di tempo: 20 minutes after completion of the epidural loading dose.
Epidural analgesia success is defined as a verbal rating scale (VRS) pain score ≤3 and bilateral sensory blockade between T10 and L1 within 20 minutes after completion of the epidural loading dose.
20 minutes after completion of the epidural loading dose.
Neonatal Apgar scores
Lasso di tempo: At 1 and 5 minutes after birth
Neonatal status will be assessed using the Apgar Score, which ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better neonatal condition. Apgar scores will be recorded at 1 minute and 5 minutes after birth.
At 1 and 5 minutes after birth
Maternal labor analgesia satisfaction score
Lasso di tempo: Within 24 hours after delivery.
Patient-reported satisfaction with labor analgesia, measured using the institutional satisfaction scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates not satisfied at all and 10 indicates completely satisfied.postpartum labor analgesia satisfaction questionnaire (or specify the validated questionnaire used, if applicable). Satisfaction scores will be reported according to the questionnaire's scoring system.
Within 24 hours after delivery.

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

1 ottobre 2024

Completamento primario (Stimato)

31 gennaio 2028

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

31 gennaio 2028

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

1 luglio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

9 luglio 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

15 luglio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

20 luglio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

17 luglio 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 giugno 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • 2023H0437

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi