Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) Versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for Fear of Cancer Recurrence (FCR) in Cancer Survivors and Their Spouses (CARE-Pilot)

5 agosto 2026 aggiornato da: PD Dr. Christina Sauer, University Center of Tumor Diseases, Frankfurt University Hospital

Coping With Fear of Cancer Recurrence (CARE-pilot): Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) Versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for Fear of Cancer Recurrence (FCR) in Cancer Survivors and Their Spouses: a 2-arm Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial

Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is one of the most significant psychological burdens faced by cancer survivors. FCR describes the fear, worry, or concern relating to the possibility that cancer will come back or progress, and is associated with reduced quality of life as well as other psychological symptoms. Approximately 60% of cancer survivors suffer from FCR, 20% of whom suffer from severe FCR. Relatives are also burdened by FCR, which in turn negatively affects the dyadic relationship as well as the survivors' quality of life. However, to date, there is a lack of evidence-based psycho-oncological couple interventions that focus on patients'/survivors' and spouses' FCR. Meta-analyses indicate the efficacy of mindfulness- and acceptance-based approaches such as acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for reducing FCR. In contrast to traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) approaches, which, for instance, aim to change thoughts and feelings by cognitive restructuring, ACT aims to increase psychological flexibility and promotes a more detached, acceptance-based attitude toward thoughts and feelings, as well as a value-based life orientation. However, the empirical evidence for ACT in relation to FCR still needs to be investigated more thoroughly.

This study, coping with fear of cancer recurrence (CARE-pilot), addresses these research gaps and aims to test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a manualized ACT couple intervention for outpatient cancer survivors (defined as cancer patients who completed primary treatment and were diagnosed < 5 years ago) and their spouses. Sixty-four couples in which either survivor, spouse or both have elevated FCR will be randomized to either the ACT couple intervention (IG) or the traditional CBT couple intervention (active control group, CG). The IG and CG interventions consist of six psychotherapy sessions (four couple sessions and two individual sessions), the content of which is intensified in online modules between sessions (blended care). The primary endpoint of the feasibility study is the retention rate and achievement of recruitment targets. Using standardized measurements, changes in FCR, quality of life (primary endpoint of preliminary efficacy), and other psychosocial variables will be assessed at post-intervention and 3 months after the end of the intervention.

The feasibility study represents the first step in evaluating the feasibility and the practicality of the couple interventions. The CARE-Pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an ACT-based couple intervention in reducing FCR, compared to a CBT-based couple intervention, in couples navigating cancer survivorship.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Introduction: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is one of the most significant psychological burdens faced by cancer survivors and their romantic partners. However, to date, there is a lack of evidence-based psycho-oncological couple interventions that focus on patients'/survivors' and spouses' FCR. Therefore, this multicenter feasibility trial aims to test the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a manualized ACT couple intervention for outpatient cancer survivors and their spouses compared with a CBT couple intervention.

Methods and analysis: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled pilot trial comparing an ACT couple intervention with a CBT couple intervention. The sample will consist out of adult cancer survivors with a confirmed ICD-10 diagnosis of any cancer site after completed primary oncological treatment and their intimate partners. Time since diagnosis of survivors is <5 years. Survivors and/or their partner will suffer from elevated FCR. The investigators aim to include n = 64 dyads within two German comprehensive cancer centers.

ACT and CBT couple intervention will be delivered by clinical psychologists face-to-face or per video sessions, consisting of six sessions (four couple sessions, two individual sessions). For both trial conditions, online content (e.g. exercises or readings) will be available to deepen session content.

Primary outcomes will be feasibility parameters (retention and recruiting rate) and preliminary efficacy (FCR of survivors and partners). Secondary outcomes will be further feasibility variables (satisfaction with the intervention, treatment fidelity) as well as psychological parameters (e.g. QoL, psychological burden), and dyadic and somatic parameters (e.g. dyadic coping, symptom interference). Explorative outcomes are ACT-based (e.g. psychological flexibility, acceptance, value-based living). The feasibility study represents the first step in evaluating the feasibility and the practicality of the couple interventions in preparation of a full power multicenter RCT. Due to its dyadic approach, our ACT couple intervention has the potential to expand the range of psychological treatment options with ecological valid treatment for reducing FCR.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

128

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Backup dei contatti dello studio

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients

  • cancer survivors (male/female/diverse) with any cancer entity
  • after completed primary treatment (not including endocrine treatment, which can be ongoing)
  • < five years after primary diagnosis
  • FCR (FoP-Q-SF total score ≥ 34) or spouses' FCR (FoP-Q-SF/P total score ≥ 34)
  • living in a partnership or marriage (homo- or heterosexual, divers)

Spouses

  • male/female/diverse spouse of a cancer survivor
  • FCR (FoP-Q-SF/P total score ≥ 34) or patients' FCR (FoP-Q-SF total score ≥ 34)

Patients and spouses:

  • age ≥18 years
  • fluency in the German language
  • able to participate in the 6-week intervention (one session per week)
  • written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients:

- metastatic disease

Patients and spouses:

  • both patient and spouse show low FCR (FoP-Q-SF total score < 34 or FoP-Q-SF/P total score < 34)
  • individuals who previously (last 2 years) participated in an ACT-, CBT-, or mindfulness-based psychosocial intervention (psycho-oncological or psychotherapeutic interventions)
  • severe psychiatric disorders and suicidality

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Doppio

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: ACT-couple intervention for FCR
ACT couple intervention for FCR, including 4 couple sessions and 2 single sessions for patients and spouses + access to a digital intervention
The ACT couples intervention comprises six sessions, consisting of four couples' sessions and two individual sessions for cancer survivors and their partners. The first and last sessions are held face-to-face and last 90 minutes. For the other sessions, couples can choose between face-to-face sessions or video-based sessions via a video conferencing tool. These sessions last 60 minutes. All ACT flexibility skills are covered. In addition, couples are given access to an online platform (CoupleACT). Through this platform, participants receive ACT-specific audio files, homework assignments and written material to help them consolidate the content covered in the sessions.
Comparatore attivo: CBT-couple intervention for FCR
CBT couple intervention for FCR, including four couple sessions and two single sessions for patients and spouses + access to a digital intervention
CBT: six sessions, comprising four couples' sessions and two individual sessions for cancer survivors and their partners. The first and last sessions are held face-to-face and last 90 minutes. For the other sessions, couples can choose between face-to-face sessions or video-based sessions via a video conferencing tool. These sessions last 60 minutes. The CBT couples intervention is based on an evaluated group therapy manual (Waadt et al., 2011). It has been adapted for the couples' context and includes, amongst other things, behavioural analysis (SORK), psychoeducation, exposure, cognitive restructuring and mindfulness training. In addition, couples are given access to an online platform (CoupleCare). Through this platform, participants receive CBT-specific audio files, homework assignments and written material to reinforce the content covered in the

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Fear of Progression Questionnaire (FoP-Q-SF) and partner version (FoP-Q-SF/P)
Lasso di tempo: From screening to three months follow up

We will assess FCR with the 12-item short form of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire (FoP-Q-SF), which is highly reliable and valid to assess FCR (68, 69). Also a validated partner version exists (FoP-Q-SF/P) which shows high reliability. (Primary outcome for preliminary efficacy).

Response scale: 1-5, min. 12, max. 60. Higher scores = worse outcome (higher fear of progression); score ≥ 34 = clincial cut-off.

From screening to three months follow up
feasibility outcomes: retention and recruiting rate
Lasso di tempo: screening to up to seven weeks (post-intervention)
screening to up to seven weeks (post-intervention)

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component
Lasso di tempo: baseline to three-months follow-up
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), 12 items; norm-based 0-100 scoring Min. = 0, max = 100. Higher scores = better outcome (better health-related quality of life)
baseline to three-months follow-up
Personal Health Questionnaire, depression module (PHQ-9)
Lasso di tempo: baseline to three-months follow-up
Assessment of depressive symptoms with 9 items, 4-point Likert scale (0-3), Min = 0; max = 27; higher scores = worse outcome (higher depression severity)
baseline to three-months follow-up
Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7)
Lasso di tempo: baseline to three-months follow-up
Assessment of anxiety symptoms with 7 items; 4-point Likert scale (0-3). Min = 0; max = 21. Higher scores = worse outcome (higher anxiety severity)
baseline to three-months follow-up
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer
Lasso di tempo: baseline to three-months follow-up
Assessment of distress with a single item, visual analogue scale (0-10). Min = 0; max = 10. Higher scores = worse outcome (higher distress).
baseline to three-months follow-up
Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes (CompACT)
Lasso di tempo: baseline to three-months follow-up
Assessment of psychological flexibility with 8 items, 7-point Likert scale (0-6). Min = 0; max = 48. Higher scores = better outcome (higher psychological flexibility)
baseline to three-months follow-up

Altre misure di risultato

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ)
Lasso di tempo: baseline to three-months follow-up
Assessment of Cognitive fusion with 7 items, 7-point Likert scale (1-7). Min. = 7, max = 49. Higher scores = worse outcome (higher cognitive fusion)
baseline to three-months follow-up
German version of the Peace, acceptance and equanimity in cancer experience (PEACE)
Lasso di tempo: baseline to three-months follow-up

Assessment of two subscales:

  1. acceptance of illness with 5 items, 4-point Likert (1-4), min = 5; max = 20. Higher scores = better outcome (higher peaceful acceptance)
  2. Struggle with Illness with 7 items, 4-point Likert (1-4), min = 7; max = 28. Higher scores = worse outcome (higher struggle with illness)
baseline to three-months follow-up
Valuing Questionnaire
Lasso di tempo: baseline to three-months follow-up

Assessment of valued living with two subscales:

  1. Values-consistent living (progress) with 5 items, 7-point Likert scale (0-6), min. = 0, max. = 30. Higher scores = better outcome (higher enactment of values)
  2. Values-inconsistent living (obstruction) with 5 items, 7-point Likert scale (0-6) min.= 0, max = 30. Higher scores = worse outcome (higher interference with valued living)
baseline to three-months follow-up
Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI)
Lasso di tempo: baseline to three-months follow-up
Dyadic coping with 35 items (of 37), 5-point Likert scale (1-5). Min. = 35; max. = 175. Higher scores = better outcome (better dyadic coping)
baseline to three-months follow-up
German version of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-G)
Lasso di tempo: baseline to three-months follow-up

Assessment of two subscales:

  1. Symptom severity with 13 items, 0-10. Min. = 0, max. = 130. Higher scores = worse outcome (more severe symptoms)
  2. Symptom interference with daily life with 6 items, 0-10, min.= 0, max. = 60. Higher scores = worse outcome (higher interference)
baseline to three-months follow-up
Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline to three-months follow-up
Assessment of fatigue with 9 items (0-10), Min. = 0, max = 90. Higher scores = higher fatigue
Baseline to three-months follow-up

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Christina Sauer, PD Dr., Frankfurt University Hospital
  • Investigatore principale: Gregor Weissflog, Dr., Leipzig University Hospital

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 agosto 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 novembre 2028

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 luglio 2029

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

23 luglio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

5 agosto 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

6 agosto 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

6 agosto 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

5 agosto 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 agosto 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • 569352800
  • 2025-2311-prospective study (Altro identificatore: ethics committee approval number)

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi