Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

This Study Aims to Evaluate the Cultural Adaptation, Implementation, and Effectiveness of the RAISE Program Grounded in Malti's 3 E's Model and the Kindness Developmental Paradigm in Portugal (RAISE-PT)

Promoting Early Childhood: Implementation and Evaluation of the RAISE in Portugal

Child mental health has become a pressing global concern, with 13-20% of children and adolescents presenting mental disorders and about half of adult disorders emerging before age 18. Socioemotional development - encompassing emotion regulation, self-empathy, and empathy for others - is considered a cornerstone of mental health and a key protective factor. Although primary caregivers are central to fostering these competencies, educators also play a decisive role once children enter preschool, while being themselves particularly vulnerable to burnout, with consequences for classroom climate and child outcomes. Integrated programs that simultaneously support children's development and adults' socioemotional competencies are therefore needed, yet remain scarce in Portugal. This study aims to evaluate the cultural adaptation, implementation, and effectiveness of the RAISE program (Research and Practice Partnership: Building Awareness and Increasing Social-Emotional Capacity in the Early Years), developed in Canada and grounded in Malti's 3 E's model and the Kindness developmental paradigm. A Randomized Controlled Trial will be conducted with approximately 100 educators from public and private institutions, randomly allocated to an intervention or waitlist control group. RAISE is delivered online over three weeks, combining asynchronous videos and synchronous group sessions across three modules. Assessments at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and follow-up will use multi-informant measures, including the DASS-21, SDQ, and SERT. Data will be analyzed through mixed ANOVA models following intention-to-treat principles. Findings are expected to inform the feasibility and cultural relevance of integrated, prevention-oriented socioemotional programs and to contribute to early childhood mental health promotion in Portugal.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Non ancora reclutamento

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Child mental health has become one of the most pressing public health concerns worldwide. It is estimated that between 13% and 20% of children and adolescents present some form of mental disorder, such as anxiety or depression, and approximately half of adult mental disorders begin before the age of 18 . These figures underscore the importance of promoting psychological well-being from early childhood and of identifying domains that play a protective role for mental health. Among these, socioemotional development has been described as the foundation of mental health, integrating emotional and social competencies that are fundamental for recognizing and self-regulating emotions, constructing identity, establishing positive interpersonal relationships, supporting learning, and making responsible decisions .

Among the theoretical models seeking to explain the development of these competencies, Malti's framework organizes socioemotional development around three components - the 3 E's: Emotion Regulation, Self-Empathy, and Empathy for Others. Emotion regulation, the first of these components, refers to the human capacity to control the occurrence, intensity, and expression of internal states in order to achieve goals and develop morally appropriate behaviors , involving both adaptive strategies (e.g., cognitive reappraisal) and maladaptive strategies (e.g., rumination, suppression) . Emotion regulation develops across the lifespan, initially supported by processes of hetero- and co-regulation with attachment figures and progressively internalized into self-regulatory skills, particularly between the ages of 3 and 4. Empathy, in turn, constitutes a central indicator of socioemotional development and unfolds across three dimensions - affective, cognitive, and behavioral - whose emergence begins in the first months of life and becomes progressively more complex throughout childhood .

Although primary caregivers play a central role in the development of these competencies , as children gain autonomy and enter preschool education, their relational world expands beyond the family context . From this ecological perspective, educators and teachers emerge as authentic agents with a decisive role in promoting children's socioemotional competencies . At the same time, the socioemotional competencies of these professionals themselves shape classroom climate and children's development . Yet the complexity of the profession and continuous exposure to emotional demands make educators and teachers particularly vulnerable to burnout and exhaustion - the so-called "burnout cascade" with direct implications for their well-being and for the quality of their interactions with children .

Considered jointly, these lines of evidence converge on the need for socioemotional learning programs that adopt an integrated approach - one that fosters children's development while simultaneously supporting the socioemotional competencies and well-being of caregivers and educators, and that addresses protective and risk factors for mental health. It is within this framework that the RAISE program (Research and Practice Partnership: Building Awareness and Increasing Social-Emotional Capacity in the Early Years) emerges, developed at the Centre for Child Development, Mental Health, and Policy (Canada), and grounded in Malti's E's model and in the developmental paradigm of Kindness . The program targets caregivers and education professionals working with children aged 3 to 8 and is organized into three modules - socioemotional development, early relationships (the 3 C's: connection, caring, and coaching), and developmental indicators such as well-being and stress - articulating three core pillars: knowledge, practice, and routine .

In Portugal, the scarcity of structured programs aimed at promoting socioemotional competencies among education professionals makes the cultural adaptation and evaluation of RAISE particularly relevant. The present study therefore aims to evaluate the adaptation, implementation, and effectiveness of the program in the Portuguese context, examining its impact on (i) professionals' knowledge and practices, (ii) professionals' mental health, (iii) children's socioemotional competencies, and (iv) children's mental health, as well as (v) the associations between these variables. It is hypothesized that professionals and children allocated to the intervention group will show significantly greater improvements in these indicators over time compared to those in the control group.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

120

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

  • Nome: João Silva, PhD Student
  • Numero di telefono: 35121881700 35121881700
  • Email: joao.silva@ispa.pt

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

Sì

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • being actively employed as an educator or teacher working with children aged 3 to 8 years;
  • being fluent in Portuguese;
  • having access to an internet-enabled electronic device (e.g., a smartphone, tablet, or computer) to participate in the online training;
  • being available to participate in all phases of the study, including the online training sessions, follow-up assessments, and questionnaire completion;
  • providing informed consent to participate in the training, follow-up sessions, and questionnaire completion.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Prevenzione
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Triplicare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Nessun intervento: Gruppo di controllo
Nessun intervento
Comparatore attivo: Intervention with Raise
Intervention
The RAISE training is delivered over three weeks and comprises three modules. Each module includes an asynchronous session (three self-paced 15-minute videos on definitions, developmental examples, and home strategies) followed by a 90-minute synchronous group session focused on practice, mindfulness, discussion, and interactive activities. The modules cover, respectively, the 3 E's of social-emotional development (emotion regulation, self-empathy, and empathy toward others), the 3 C's of early relationships (connection, caring, and coaching), and developmental indicators such as well-being, resilience, and stress, with educators receiving additional content on assessment tools. Follow-up sessions are held one week and two months after completion, and participants retain unlimited online access to all materials (Speidel et al., 2021, 2023, 2024).

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; Goodman, 1997)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, up to five weeks, up to 13 weeks
The SDQ (Goodman, 1997; Portuguese version: Fleitlich, Loureiro, Fonseca, & Gaspar, 2005) assesses children's strengths and difficulties across five domains: (1) emotional symptoms, (2) conduct problems, (3) hyperactivity/inattention, (4) peer problems, and (5) prosocial behavior. The scale has 25 items rated on a 3-point scale (0 = not true, 1 = somewhat true, 2 = certainly true). Children's competencies (strengths) are assessed through the prosocial behavior domain, whereas the total difficulties score is derived from the remaining four domains.
Baseline, up to five weeks, up to 13 weeks
Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale - 21 (DASS-21)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, up to five weeks, up to 13 weeks
The DASS-21 (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995; Portuguese version: Pais-Ribeiro, Honrado, & Leal, 2004) is a self-report scale designed to assess the emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress. It comprises 21 items, each rated on a 4-point scale (0 = did not apply to me at all to 3 = applied to me very much, or most of the time). The scale comprises three subscales: (1) depression (7 items), assessing symptoms such as inertia, dysphoria, lack of interest or involvement, anhedonia, self-deprecation, discouragement, and devaluation of life; (2) anxiety (7 items), assessing autonomic arousal, subjective experiences of anxiety, musculoskeletal effects, and situational anxiety; and (3) stress (7 items), assessing difficulty relaxing, ease of being upset or agitated, nervous arousal, irritability, exaggerated reactions, and impatience.
Baseline, up to five weeks, up to 13 weeks
Social-Emotional Responding Task (SERT; Malti, 2017)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, up to five weeks, up to 13 weeks
The SERT (Malti, 2017) is an instrument for assessing social-emotional development in children aged 4 to 8 years across four domains: (1) emotion regulation, (2) healthy guilt, (3) self-sympathy, and (4) sympathy for others (Malti, 2017; Malti et al., 2021). The 29-item questionnaire uses a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree) and asks caregivers and educators/teachers to rate the child's behavior based on interactions with others and reactions to specific scenarios (e.g., "My child feels bad for other children who are sad").
Baseline, up to five weeks, up to 13 weeks

Altre misure di risultato

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Satisfaction with the training (Speidel et al., 2021, 2023, 2024)
Lasso di tempo: up to five weeks
After each asynchronous and synchronous session, participants will report their satisfaction with the session on a 10-point scale (1 = very dissatisfied, 4 = to a small extent, 7 = to a moderate extent, 10 = very satisfied).
up to five weeks
Perceptions of learning
Lasso di tempo: one weeks, two weeks, three weeks
participants will report their perceptions of their own learning on a single item rated on a 10-point scale (1 = not at all to 10 =to a very great extent).
one weeks, two weeks, three weeks
Intent to use strategies
Lasso di tempo: one week, two weeks, three weeks
e.g., "To what extent would you use any of the strategies mentioned in the training to promote growth and well-being?").
one week, two weeks, three weeks
Knowledge of training content
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, one week, two weeks, three weeks and up to 13 weeks.
Participants will report their understanding of core social-emotional concepts. These items were developed by Speidel, Colasante, and Malti to assess knowledge of the core social-emotional concepts targeted in the training (e.g., "I understand what empathy for oneself is and how it develops") as well as knowledge of how to apply them (e.g., "I know how to support children's empathy for themselves"). Items are rated on a 10-point scale (1 = entirely disagree, 4 = somewhat disagree, 7 = somewhat agree, 10 = entirely agree).
Baseline, one week, two weeks, three weeks and up to 13 weeks.

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Collaboratori

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Manuela Verissimo, PhD, ISPA - Instituto Universitario de Ciencias Psicologicas, Sociais e da Vida

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 ottobre 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

30 dicembre 2027

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

31 dicembre 2027

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

3 agosto 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

6 agosto 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

12 agosto 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

12 agosto 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

6 agosto 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 agosto 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • E-I-006-03-26

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Descrizione del piano IPD

Intellectual Property Data (IPD) might not be shared due to concerns about confidentiality and legal restrictions. Sharing it could risk exposing proprietary or sensitive information, including details that may affect entire family's privacy.

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi