Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Comparative Study Between Leg Massage and Vibration on Cramps and Comfort for Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis

18 agosto 2026 aggiornato da: Maitham abed Shawwat, University of Baghdad
This planned randomized controlled trial will enroll 164 patients undergoing hemodialysis to compare the effectiveness of leg massage versus vibration therapy on muscle cramps and patient comfort. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: a massage group receiving 20-minute lower extremity massage sessions, a vibration group receiving 10-minute vibration therapy, or a control group receiving standard care only. All interventions will be administered three times per week for two weeks (six sessions). The study will evaluate cramp frequency, cramp severity using a Visual Analog Scale, sleep quality through the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and patient comfort scores. Both interventions are expected to significantly reduce cramp frequency and severity compared to standard care, with massage anticipated to show superior benefits for sleep quality and home-based cramp reduction, while vibration is expected to provide better immediate comfort during dialysis sessions. No serious adverse events are predicted. The findings will help healthcare providers offer personalized, evidence-based non-pharmacological options to improve quality of life for hemodialysis patients.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Non ancora reclutamento

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Muscle cramps are one of the most common and distressing complications experienced by patients undergoing hemodialysis, affecting approximately 33% to 86% of this population. These involuntary, painful muscle contractions, predominantly occurring in the lower extremities, often lead to premature termination of dialysis sessions, sleep disturbances, and significant deterioration in quality of life. While pharmacological interventions such as hypertonic saline, glucose, and carnitine supplements are currently used, their effectiveness remains inconsistent and they may carry adverse effects. Consequently, there is a growing interest in non-pharmacological approaches that are safe, cost-effective, and easily integrated into routine dialysis care. Both leg massage and vibration therapy have shown individual promise in managing muscle cramps and improving patient comfort, yet no large-scale randomized controlled trial has directly compared their relative effectiveness. This study will address this critical knowledge gap by providing head-to-head comparative evidence to guide clinical decision-making.

This study will be designed as a prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial conducted across three outpatient hemodialysis centers. A total of 164 adult patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis for at least three months who experience lower extremity muscle cramps will be enrolled. After providing informed consent, participants will be stratified based on dialysis session frequency, baseline cramp frequency, age, and gender to ensure homogeneity across groups. Using a computer-generated random sequence, patients will be allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three groups: the massage group (n=61), the vibration group (n=57), or the control group (n=46). Due to the nature of the interventions, blinding of participants and intervention providers will not be feasible; however, outcome assessors and data analysts will remain blinded to group allocation to minimize detection bias.

Participants in the massage group will receive a standardized 20-minute lower extremity massage during each hemodialysis session, administered three times per week for a total of two weeks (six sessions). The massage protocol will include effleurage (gentle stroking), petrissage (kneading), friction (deep circular movements), and tapotement (rhythmic tapping) applied by trained registered nurses with certification in therapeutic massage. The vibration group will receive 10 minutes of mechanical vibration therapy using a portable device delivering vibration at a frequency of 30-50 Hz with an amplitude of 2-4 mm, applied to the posterior calf, anterior tibial, and quadriceps muscles. The control group will receive standard dialysis care without any additional interventions. The primary outcomes will be cramp frequency (recorded via daily patient diaries during dialysis and at home) and cramp severity measured using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes will include sleep quality assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), patient comfort scores during dialysis sessions, and documentation of any adverse events.

It is hypothesized that both massage and vibration interventions will demonstrate significant superiority over standard care in reducing cramp frequency and severity, with each intervention showing distinct advantages in specific outcome domains. Specifically, the massage group is expected to exhibit greater improvement in sleep quality and more substantial reduction in home-based cramping episodes compared to both the vibration and control groups. Conversely, the vibration group is anticipated to achieve higher immediate comfort scores during dialysis sessions, reflecting the shorter intervention duration and potentially greater patient tolerability. Both interventions are predicted to be safe, with no serious adverse events expected. The findings from this trial will provide robust evidence to guide personalized, patient-centered care, enabling healthcare providers to recommend either massage or vibration based on individual patient priorities, clinical presentation, and available resources. Ultimately, integrating these evidence-based non-pharmacological interventions into routine hemodialysis protocols has the potential to substantially improve treatment adherence, patient satisfaction, and overall quality of life for the growing population of patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

160

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients on maintenance HD for ≥3 months who experienced lower extremity muscle cramps.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria included acute illness, lower extremity wounds/infections, deep vein thrombosis, severe neuropathy, and cognitive impairment. All participants provided written informed consent.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Prevenzione
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Nessun intervento: controllo
nessun intervento
Sperimentale: study
interventional
Received a standardized 20-minute lower extremity massage (effleurage, petrissage, friction, tapotement) during each HD session, 3x/week for 2 weeks (6 sessions), administered by trained nurses (19).
Received 10 minutes of mechanical vibration (30-50 Hz, 2-4 mm amplitude) applied to the calf, tibialis anterior, and quadriceps muscles via a portable device during each HD session (20).

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
primary
Lasso di tempo: 2 weeks
• Primary: Cramp frequency (episodes/week during HD and at home via daily diary) and cramp severity (10-cm Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) (21).
2 weeks

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

10 settembre 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

10 dicembre 2026

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

12 dicembre 2026

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

13 agosto 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

18 agosto 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

20 agosto 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

20 agosto 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

18 agosto 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 agosto 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

INDECISO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi