Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Guided Root Slice Replantation vs. Socket Shielding for Immediate Implant Placement in Esthetic Zone

22 settembre 2026 aggiornato da: Hussein Fathy Mohammad Hussein Abo Elkheir, Minia University

Artificial Intelligence Integrated Planning and Evaluation of Novel Fully Guided Autogenous Root Slice Replantation and Fully Guided Socket Shielding in Immediate Esthetic Implant Placement (Randomized Clinical Trial)

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether two different tooth-preservation techniques work equally well when placing a dental implant right after a tooth is removed in the front of the mouth (the "esthetic zone"). It will also learn whether using artificial intelligence (AI) to help plan the surgery improves the results.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does keeping part of the root in place using a technique called autogenous root slice replantation work as well as a similar technique called socket shielding, in terms of appearance and gum health around the implant?
  • Does AI-guided surgical planning improve accuracy, appearance, and gum health compared with traditional planning?

Researchers will compare participants who receive autogenous root slice replantation to participants who receive the socket-shield technique to see if one produces better outcomes than the other. Both groups will have their implants placed using a 3D-printed surgical guide made from AI-assisted digital planning.

Participants will:

  • Have a tooth removed and an implant placed on the same day, using one of the two techniques
  • Have their surgery guided by a custom surgical guide, planned with AI assistance
  • Return for follow-up visits so researchers can check healing, gum appearance, and how well the implant fits with their smile

Panoramica dello studio

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

30

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Luoghi di studio

    • Minya Governorate
      • Minya, Minya Governorate, Egitto, 61512
        • Reclutamento
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University
        • Contatto:

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

Da 20 anni a 40 anni (Adulto)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Selected patients of both sexes are 20-40 years old.

  2. Patients are systemically healthy based on questionnaire dental modification of Cornell index.

  3. Clinical gingival health either on intact or reduced periodontium according to the new classification system (2017). (Lang, N. P. et al., 2018)

  4. The recipient site of the implant is free from any active pathological conditions.

  5. Class II extraction socket according to Sabri and Barootchi classification ( Sabri, H.

    et al., 2024)

  6. Adequate interocclusal space to accommodate the available restorative components.

  7. Adequate native/apical bone to achieve primary implant stability.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant female.
  2. Parafunctional habits such as bruxism and clenching Patients suffering from periodontitis.
  3. Smokers.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Doppio

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Comparatore attivo: Fully Single Guided Socket Shield

Participants in this arm will undergo the socket-shield technique for immediate implant placement using a single, fully guided digital protocol. Following artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted digital planning, a single surgical guide will direct both the sectioning of the facial root fragment (shield preparation) and the immediate implant osteotomy and placement in one continuous, fully guided sequence. The facial root fragment will be retained to support the labial bone plate and peri-implant soft tissues, while immediate provisionalization will be performed. Participants will be followed to assess implant accuracy, esthetic outcomes, and peri-implant tissue health.

A single, AI-planned surgical guide is used to perform both root sectioning and implant osteotomy/placement in one uninterrupted guided sequence. The facial (buccal) portion of the natural root is intentionally retained in situ - decoronated and prepared to a defined sub-crestal height and thickness under full guidance - to preserve the labial bone plate and periodontal ligament-derived vascularity. The implant is placed immediately palatal/lingual to the shield, and immediate provisionalization is performed. This differs from conventional socket-shield protocols, which typically use freehand or dual-guide sequences (separate guides for sectioning and implant placement).

Implant placement performed on the same day as tooth extraction, using a single, AI-assisted, fully guided digital surgical protocol common to all three study arms. Pre-operative digital planning (integrating CBCT and intraoral scan data with AI-assisted analysis) is used to determine implant position, angulation, and depth, and to design a single surgical guide. This guide directs the osteotomy and implant insertion, standardizing implant positioning across all arms regardless of the labial defect-management technique used (socket shield, ARSR, or bone augmentation). This shared, standardized component allows the trial to isolate the effect of the labial defect-management technique on esthetic and peri-implant outcomes, since implant placement accuracy is controlled identically across groups.

Comparatore attivo: Fully Guided Autogenous Root Slicing Replantation

Participants in this arm will undergo the autogenous root slice replantation (ARSR) technique for immediate implant placement using a single, fully guided digital protocol. Following artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted digital planning, a single surgical guide will direct both the sectioning and preparation of the autogenous root slice and the immediate implant osteotomy and placement in one continuous, fully guided sequence. The prepared root slice will be replanted and retained facially within the socket to support the labial bone plate and peri-implant soft tissues, while immediate provisionalization will be performed. Participants will be followed to assess implant accuracy, esthetic outcomes, and peri-implant tissue health.

Implant placement performed on the same day as tooth extraction, using a single, AI-assisted, fully guided digital surgical protocol common to all three study arms. Pre-operative digital planning (integrating CBCT and intraoral scan data with AI-assisted analysis) is used to determine implant position, angulation, and depth, and to design a single surgical guide. This guide directs the osteotomy and implant insertion, standardizing implant positioning across all arms regardless of the labial defect-management technique used (socket shield, ARSR, or bone augmentation). This shared, standardized component allows the trial to isolate the effect of the labial defect-management technique on esthetic and peri-implant outcomes, since implant placement accuracy is controlled identically across groups.

A single, AI-planned surgical guide directs both the harvesting/slicing of an autogenous root segment and the immediate implant osteotomy and placement in one continuous guided workflow. Unlike the socket-shield technique, the root slice is sectioned and then replanted (repositioned) facially within the fresh socket as a free graft, rather than left attached in its native position. The slice is guided to a standardized dimension, position, and depth to support the labial plate and soft tissue architecture. Immediate provisionalization is performed. This is the first reported application of full digital/AI guidance to the ARSR technique.

Comparatore attivo: Conventional Bone Augmentation

Participants in this arm will undergo immediate implant placement combined with conventional guided bone grafting to manage any labial bone defects (dehiscence or fenestration), rather than a partial extraction therapy technique. Following artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted digital planning, a single surgical guide will direct the immediate implant osteotomy and placement. Bone graft material and a barrier membrane will be used to restore the labial bone defect at the time of implant placement, and immediate provisionalization will be performed. Participants will be followed to assess implant accuracy, esthetic outcomes, and peri-implant tissue health.

Implant placement performed on the same day as tooth extraction, using a single, AI-assisted, fully guided digital surgical protocol common to all three study arms. Pre-operative digital planning (integrating CBCT and intraoral scan data with AI-assisted analysis) is used to determine implant position, angulation, and depth, and to design a single surgical guide. This guide directs the osteotomy and implant insertion, standardizing implant positioning across all arms regardless of the labial defect-management technique used (socket shield, ARSR, or bone augmentation). This shared, standardized component allows the trial to isolate the effect of the labial defect-management technique on esthetic and peri-implant outcomes, since implant placement accuracy is controlled identically across groups.

Immediate implant placement is performed using a single AI-planned surgical guide for implant osteotomy and positioning only (no root-sectioning component). Any labial dehiscence or fenestration defect present after extraction is managed using the current gold-standard approach: particulate bone graft material placed against the defect and covered with a barrier membrane to guide bone regeneration. No tooth root structure is retained. Immediate provisionalization is performed. This arm serves as the active control, isolating the effect of partial extraction therapy (root retention) from AI-guided implant placement alone.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Labial Bone Thickness
Lasso di tempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Labial bone plate thickness measured via cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to evaluate preservation of the labial bone contour following autogenous root slice replantation (ARSR), socket shield, or conventional bone augmentation.

through study completion, an average of 1 year
Marginal Bone Level
Lasso di tempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Radiographic marginal bone level around the implant, assessed via CBCT, to evaluate crestal bone stability across the three treatment groups.

through study completion, an average of 1 year
Accuracy of AI-Assisted Digital Planning
Lasso di tempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year

AI-based segmentation of the tooth/root to be sectioned will be compared against human (manual) segmentation using a heat map to quantify the average discrepancy between the two, assessing the accuracy and reliability of AI integration in surgical planni

through study completion, an average of 1 year

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Bone Density
Lasso di tempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Peri-implant bone density assessed labially and proximally via CBCT.

through study completion, an average of 1 year
Peri-Implant Probing Depth
Lasso di tempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Clinical probing depth around the implant measured at multiple sites.

through study completion, an average of 1 year
Modified Gingival Index
Lasso di tempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Clinical assessment of peri-implant soft tissue inflammation.

through study completion, an average of 1 year
Modified Plaque Index
Lasso di tempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Clinical assessment of plaque accumulation around the implant.

through study completion, an average of 1 year
Keratinized Tissue Width and Thickness
Lasso di tempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Width and thickness of keratinized mucosa surrounding the implant, measured clinically.

through study completion, an average of 1 year
Pink Esthetic Score (PES) scaled from 0 to 2
Lasso di tempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Validated index evaluating the esthetic appearance of the peri-implant soft tissues.

through study completion, an average of 1 year
White Esthetic Score (WES)
Lasso di tempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Validated index evaluating the esthetic appearance of the implant-supported crown.

through study completion, an average of 1 year
Postoperative Pain (Visual Analog Scale)
Lasso di tempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Patient-reported pain intensity measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

through study completion, an average of 1 year
AI Utility in Postoperative Follow-Up
Lasso di tempo: through study completion, an average of 1 year

AI-assessed proposed implant fixture position compared against the actual postoperative position, to evaluate the utility and accuracy of AI in follow-up assessment.

through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

16 giugno 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 novembre 2027

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

30 marzo 2028

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

4 settembre 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

22 settembre 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

28 settembre 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

28 settembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

22 settembre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 settembre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • MiniaU128-1322

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

prodotto fabbricato ed esportato dagli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi