Patient Selection and Long-Term Outcomes of Pace & Ablate Strategy in Atrial Fibrillation (REPACE)
Patient Selection and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With a Pace & Ablate Strategy for Interventional Rate Control in Symptomatic Permanent Atrial Fibrillation - A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis
Atrioventricular node ablation with permanent pacing (the "pace-and-ablate" strategy) controls ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation that has not responded to drug therapy or catheter ablation. Chronic right ventricular pacing, however, can cause pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM), and it is not well established which patients are at risk and should therefore receive conduction system pacing or biventricular pacing instead.
REPACE is a multicentre retrospective cohort of consecutive patients who underwent atrioventricular node ablation from January 2011 onwards at five centres in Switzerland, the United Kingdom and Poland: Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Inselspital Bern, University Hospital Basel, Geneva University Hospitals and the Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, Zabrze. More than 2,000 patients ablated up to March 2024 have been included to date; patients ablated after that date at the participating centres are being added.
The study has three aims: to validate, in an independent multicentre population, a previously published risk model for pacing-induced cardiomyopathy; to describe the procedural technique and outcomes of atrioventricular node ablation across different health systems; and to estimate the health-economic impact of the pace-and-ablate strategy.
Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy is defined as an absolute reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction of at least 10 percentage points to a value below 50%. All potential endpoints are adjudicated by a clinical events committee blinded to the classification made at the site.
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Descrizione dettagliata
Data collection. Baseline demographics, comorbidity, device and procedural data, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic measurements, follow-up events and mortality were abstracted from hospital records at each participating centre into a central electronic case report form.
Endpoint adjudication. Every potential endpoint is reviewed by two independent adjudicators blinded to the classification made at the site, with a third reviewer consulted where they disagree. Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy is assessed on every adjudicated event, independently of how that event is otherwise classified.
Analysis populations. The validation of the risk model is performed in the patients who had neither cardiac resynchronisation therapy nor conduction system pacing at baseline, because a decline in left ventricular function in an already resynchronised patient represents non-response to resynchronisation rather than pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Patients with resynchronisation at baseline are described and contribute to the procedural and health-economic analyses. No lower limit of baseline ejection fraction is applied: since the definition requires a fall of at least 10 percentage points to a value below 50%, patients already below 50% at baseline can meet it.
Health-economic analysis. Direct costs are derived from Hospital Episode Statistics in the United Kingdom, individual procedure costs from the SwissEPnet registry for Switzerland, and diagnosis-related group and hospital costs for Switzerland and Poland, covering hospital charges, device costs and subsequent care for complications and follow-up. Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses use Markov models to compare pacing strategies.
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Stimato)
Contatti e Sedi
Contatto studio
- Nome: Nikola A Kozhuharov, PD Dr. med.
- Numero di telefono: +41 76 443 90 86
- Email: nikola.kozhuharov@insel.ch
Luoghi di studio
-
-
-
Zabrze, Polonia, 41-800
- Reclutamento
- Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases
-
Investigatore principale:
- Agnieszka Babińska, MD
-
-
-
-
Merseyside
-
Liverpool, Merseyside, Regno Unito, L14 3PE
- Reclutamento
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital
-
Contatto:
- Dhiraj Gupta, MD, FRCP
- Email: Dhiraj.Gupta@lhch.nhs.uk
-
Investigatore principale:
- Dhiraj Gupta, MD, FRCP
-
-
-
-
-
Basel, Svizzera, 4031
- Reclutamento
- University Hospital Basel
-
Investigatore principale:
- Christian Sticherling, MD
-
Geneva, Svizzera, 1205
- Reclutamento
- Geneva University Hospitals
-
Investigatore principale:
- Haran Burri, MD
-
-
Canton of Bern
-
Bern, Canton of Bern, Svizzera, 3010
- Reclutamento
- Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern
-
Contatto:
- Nikola A Kozhuharov, PD Dr. med.
- Email: nikola.kozhuharov@insel.ch
-
Investigatore principale:
- Nikola A Kozhuharov, PD Dr. med.
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
Accetta volontari sani
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Metodo di campionamento
Popolazione di studio
Consecutive adults with symptomatic atrial fibrillation refractory to drug therapy or catheter ablation who underwent atrioventricular node ablation as part of a pace-and-ablate strategy at five participating centres in Switzerland, the United Kingdom and Poland from January 2011 onwards.
Retrospective inclusion is covered by general consent to the further use of health-related data where this is on file. For deceased or uncontactable patients with no documented refusal, inclusion is covered by the exception from consent under Article 34 of the Swiss Human Research Act (Absence of informed consent), the project having been approved by the Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern. The United Kingdom site operates under IRAS 314643.
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older at the time of atrioventricular node ablation
- Atrial fibrillation, undergoing atrioventricular node ablation with a permanent cardiac implantable electronic device already in situ or implanted as part of the pace-and-ablate strategy
- Availability of baseline echocardiographic data, including left ventricular ejection fraction
Exclusion Criteria:
* Documented refusal of the further use of health-related data
Note: cardiac resynchronisation therapy or conduction system pacing at baseline is not an eligibility exclusion. Such patients are included in the cohort and in the procedural and health-economic analyses, but are excluded from the validation of the pacing-induced cardiomyopathy risk model, in which a decline in left ventricular function would represent non-response to resynchronisation. No lower limit of baseline ejection fraction is applied.
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Modelli osservazionali: COHORT
- Prospettive temporali: RETROSPECTIVE
Coorti e interventi
Gruppo / Coorte |
|---|
|
Pace-and-ablate cohort
Consecutive adults with atrial fibrillation who underwent atrioventricular node ablation with a permanent cardiac implantable electronic device at the five participating centres from January 2011 onwards. Within this cohort, the patients who had neither cardiac resynchronisation therapy nor conduction system pacing at baseline form the population for the validation of the pacing-induced cardiomyopathy risk model. |
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM)
Lasso di tempo: From atrioventricular node ablation up to 10 years
|
Proportion of patients who develop PICM, defined as an absolute reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of at least 10 percentage points to a value below 50% on echocardiography after atrioventricular node ablation with ventricular pacing. Each potential event is adjudicated by two independent reviewers blinded to the classification made at the site, with a third reviewer consulted in case of disagreement. |
From atrioventricular node ablation up to 10 years
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
All-cause mortality by pacing modality
Lasso di tempo: From atrioventricular node ablation up to 5 years
|
Proportion of patients who die from any cause, reported separately for right ventricular pacing, biventricular pacing and conduction system pacing. |
From atrioventricular node ablation up to 5 years
|
|
Heart failure hospitalisation by pacing modality
Lasso di tempo: From atrioventricular node ablation up to 5 years
|
Proportion of patients with at least one hospitalisation for heart failure, reported separately for right ventricular pacing, biventricular pacing and conduction system pacing. |
From atrioventricular node ablation up to 5 years
|
|
Acute procedural success of atrioventricular node ablation
Lasso di tempo: Periprocedural (index atrioventricular node ablation)
|
Proportion of procedures with complete atrioventricular block at the end of the procedure, i.e. intended loss of atrioventricular conduction with transition to ventricular pacing. |
Periprocedural (index atrioventricular node ablation)
|
|
Use of a second ablation catheter, by type of first ablation catheter (irrigated versus non-irrigated)
Lasso di tempo: Periprocedural (index atrioventricular node ablation)
|
Proportion of procedures in which a second ablation catheter was required to achieve atrioventricular block, reported separately for procedures started with an irrigated and with a non-irrigated catheter. |
Periprocedural (index atrioventricular node ablation)
|
|
Presence of a ventricular escape rhythm after atrioventricular node ablation
Lasso di tempo: Periprocedural (index atrioventricular node ablation)
|
Proportion of patients with a ventricular escape rhythm documented at the end of the atrioventricular node ablation procedure. |
Periprocedural (index atrioventricular node ablation)
|
|
Procedure duration by use of a long sheath
Lasso di tempo: Periprocedural (index atrioventricular node ablation)
|
Duration of the atrioventricular node ablation procedure in minutes, reported separately for procedures performed with and without a long sheath. |
Periprocedural (index atrioventricular node ablation)
|
|
Cumulative direct healthcare costs per patient
Lasso di tempo: From atrioventricular node ablation up to 5 years
|
Cumulative direct healthcare costs per patient in euros, covering the index procedure (hospital stay, device and consumables) and subsequent hospital care for complications and follow-up. Costs are derived from Hospital Episode Statistics (United Kingdom), the SwissEPnet registry and diagnosis-related group data (Switzerland, Poland) and converted to euros. |
From atrioventricular node ablation up to 5 years
|
|
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of conduction system pacing versus right ventricular pacing
Lasso di tempo: From atrioventricular node ablation up to 5 years
|
Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, estimated with a Markov model from the observed event rates and direct healthcare costs, overall and across strata of predicted pacing-induced cardiomyopathy risk and of procedural complexity. |
From atrioventricular node ablation up to 5 years
|
|
Return to sinus rhythm during follow-up
Lasso di tempo: From atrioventricular node ablation up to 5 years
|
Proportion of patients with documented return to sinus rhythm on electrocardiogram or device interrogation after atrioventricular node ablation. |
From atrioventricular node ablation up to 5 years
|
|
Discrimination of the published and of an updated pacing-induced cardiomyopathy risk model (C-statistic)
Lasso di tempo: From atrioventricular node ablation up to 10 years
|
C-statistic (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) for predicting pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, reported for the previously published risk model as originally specified and for a model updated in this cohort (recalibration and re-estimation of predictor weights, with candidate additional predictors), in patients without cardiac resynchronisation therapy or conduction system pacing at baseline. |
From atrioventricular node ablation up to 10 years
|
|
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of biventricular pacing versus right ventricular pacing
Lasso di tempo: From atrioventricular node ablation up to 5 years
|
Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, estimated with a Markov model from the observed event rates and direct healthcare costs, overall and across strata of predicted pacing-induced cardiomyopathy risk and of procedural complexity. |
From atrioventricular node ablation up to 5 years
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Collaboratori
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Nikola A Kozhuharov, PD Dr. med., Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Pubblicazioni e link utili
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
Completamento primario (Stimato)
Completamento dello studio (Stimato)
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- 2019-01151
- 2019 (Sovvenzione/contratto NIH degli Stati Uniti)
- 4079 (Altro identificatore: Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern)
- 314643 (Altro identificatore: IRAS, UK Health Research Authority)
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .