Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

GenAI-Assisted Rheumatoid Arthritis Bone Erosion Risk Assessment and DMARD Selection (RABER)

Prospective Evaluation of Generative AI-Augmented Clinical Decision-Making for Rheumatoid Arthritis Bone Erosion Risk (RABER) Assessment and DMARD Selection in Routine Care

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by progressive joint damage and bone erosion. Accurate assessment of RA bone erosion risk (RABER) and appropriate disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) selection are critical to preventing irreversible disability.

Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), particularly large language models (LLMs), enable integration of heterogeneous clinical data and may improve clinical decision-making. However, there is limited real-world evidence (RWE) evaluating whether GenAI can meaningfully augment physician decision-making in routine care.

This prospective, single-arm, nonrandomized interventional study evaluates the feasibility and impact of GenAI-assisted clinical decision support on physician assessment of rheumatoid arthritis bone erosion risk and disease-modifying antirheumatic drug selection in routine inpatient care. Treating physicians document their initial risk assessments and treatment decisions before reviewing patient-specific GenAI reports and subsequently record their assessments and decisions after reviewing the reports. The study evaluates changes in physician clinical decision-making within a learning health system framework. Final treatment decisions remain under the responsibility of the treating physicians. The study does not evaluate long-term patient clinical outcomes.

Panoramica dello studio

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

100

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Luoghi di studio

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Cina, 100053
        • Reclutamento
        • Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
        • Contatto:
        • Investigatore principale:
          • Quan Jiang, MD

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Newly diagnosed RA patients meeting American College of Rheumatology / European League Against Rheumatism 2010 classification criteria
  • Consecutive inpatients admitted during study period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients subsequently determined not to have RA
  • Incomplete clinical data preventing risk or treatment assessment

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Ricerca sui servizi sanitari
  • Assegnazione: N / A
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione di gruppo singolo
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: GenAI-Assisted RA Bone Erosion Risk Assessment and DMARD Selection

This arm will include at least 100 consecutive adult inpatients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving routine clinical care. For each patient, the treating physician will first independently assess bone erosion risk and select a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment strategy based on available clinical information (pre-AI assessment). The physician will then review a GenAI-generated clinical decision support report containing predicted bone erosion risk levels and DMARD recommendations and record an updated risk assessment and treatment decision (post-AI assessment). Pre-AI and post-AI physician decisions will be compared against independent expert reference standards to evaluate the impact of GenAI-assisted decision support. Treating physicians retain full responsibility for final clinical decisions.

The intervention consists of a GenAI-generated clinical decision support report provided to treating physicians during routine RA care. Using patient clinical information available at the time of assessment, the GenAI system generates predicted bone erosion risk probabilities (0-100%), risk levels (0-3), and DMARD treatment recommendations. Physicians review the report after completing their independent pre-AI assessments and may revise their risk assessments and treatment decisions based on the additional information. The GenAI system provides decision support only and does not autonomously make or implement treatment decisions.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Percentage of Participants With a Change in Physician-Assessed Rheumatoid Arthritis Bone Erosion Risk Level After GenAI-Assisted Decision Support
Lasso di tempo: During index hospitalization, at pre-AI and post-AI physician assessments (approximately 1-7 days)

The percentage of participants for whom the treating physician changes the rheumatoid arthritis bone erosion risk level after reviewing the GenAI-generated clinical decision support report, compared with the initial assessment before reviewing the report. Risk levels are categorized from 0 to 3. A change is defined as any difference between the pre-AI and post-AI risk levels. The percentage is calculated using participants with complete paired assessments.

During index hospitalization, at pre-AI and post-AI physician assessments (approximately 1-7 days)
Cohen's Kappa Agreement Between Physician-Assessed Rheumatoid Arthritis Bone Erosion Risk Levels and the Reference Standard Before and After GenAI-Assisted Decision Support
Lasso di tempo: During index hospitalization, at pre-AI and post-AI physician assessments (approximately 1-7 days)

Agreement between physician-assessed rheumatoid arthritis bone erosion risk levels (0-3) and the reference standard will be evaluated separately before and after review of the GenAI report using Cohen's kappa coefficient. The pre-AI and post-AI kappa coefficients will be compared to assess changes in agreement following GenAI-assisted decision support. Cohen's kappa ranges from -1 to 1, with higher values indicating greater agreement beyond chance. The difference between post-AI and pre-AI kappa coefficients will be reported, with positive values indicating improved agreement. The reference classification will be established during the data analysis stage by three independent expert physicians who are not involved in patient treatment, with disagreements resolved through consensus.

During index hospitalization, at pre-AI and post-AI physician assessments (approximately 1-7 days)

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Cohen's Kappa Agreement Between Physician DMARD Treatment Selection Categories and the Reference Standard After GenAI-Assisted Decision Support
Lasso di tempo: During index hospitalization, after physician review of the GenAI report (approximately 1-7 days)

Agreement between physician-selected disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment categories (0-4) and the reference standard will be assessed after physicians review the GenAI-generated clinical decision support report. Agreement will be quantified using Cohen's kappa coefficient, with higher values indicating greater agreement beyond chance. The analysis will include participants with complete post-AI physician treatment selections and corresponding reference standard classifications. The reference classification will be established during the data analysis stage by three independent expert physicians who are not involved in patient treatment, with disagreements resolved through consensus.

During index hospitalization, after physician review of the GenAI report (approximately 1-7 days)

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

1 marzo 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

31 ottobre 2026

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

31 dicembre 2026

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

21 ottobre 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

28 ottobre 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

4 novembre 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

4 novembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

28 ottobre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 ottobre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • 2026-667-KY-01-raber1
  • CI2023C019YL (Altro numero di sovvenzione/finanziamento: China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences)
  • CI2026A01501 (Altro numero di sovvenzione/finanziamento: China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences)
  • HLCMHPP2023087 (Altro numero di sovvenzione/finanziamento: China National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine)
  • 82230121 (Altro numero di sovvenzione/finanziamento: National Natural Science Foundation of China)

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi