Feasibility Testing of Decision Support for Patients Who Are Candidates for an Implantable Defibrillator
Development of and Feasibility Testing of Decision Support for Patients Who Are Candidates for an Implantable Defibrillator
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to a ventricular arrhythmia is a serious cause of cardiovascular death in Canada. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) offers high-risk patients a treatment option to reduce the incidence of SCD by delivering an internal shock to restore a normal rhythm, if needed. Definitive evidence has established the effectiveness of the ICD for reducing mortality when used as prophylaxis for SCD (a primary prevention indication). Approximately 3,700 new candidates accrue annually. Practice guidelines define the criteria to determine patient ICD candidacy for primary prevention. However, in addition to SCD risk, ICD candidates may have chronic diseases such as diabetes, renal insufficiency, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. Thus, balancing the benefits and risks of an ICD can become complex, particularly when competing mortality risks are present. Research has recognized human costs associated with device complications and shocks affecting psychological, health related quality of life (HRQL), and morbidity outcomes. The complexities surrounding the long-term benefits/risks, complications, replacements, and shocks, warrant decision support to prepare patients to make decisions. In Canada, there is no clear framework to support patients' decision-making in the context of ICD treatment options. Decision support, using a decision aid, could moderate treatment related uncertainty and prepare patients to make active, informed, quality decisions.
Objectives: 1) develop a decision aid for ICD candidates to support quality decision-making (informed, deliberate, values-based choices), 2) to evaluate the decision aid, and 3) to determine the feasibility of conducting a trial.
調査の概要
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Ontario
-
Hamilton、Ontario、カナダ、L8P 2X2
- Hamilton Health Sciences
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Referred for consideration of an ICD(non-CRT)for a primary prevention indication
- English speaking
- able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- unable to understand the decision aid due to a language barrier or visual impairment
- referred for secondary prevention indication
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:ヘルスサービス研究
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:Patient Decision Aid for an ICD (primary prevention, non-CRT)
The intervention group will receive the PtDA, which provides a lay summary that outlines the facts, risks, benefits (including probabilities), specific to the option of an implantable defibrillator or the option of medical management to prepare them for consultation with the physician.
Values are assessed to reveal which features of each option are important to patients.
|
The intervention group will receive the PtDA, which provides a lay summary that outlines the facts, risks, benefits (including probabilities), specific to the option of an implantable defibrillator or the option of medical management to prepare them for consultation with the physician.
Values are assessed to reveal which features of each option are important to patients.
他の名前:
|
|
介入なし:Usual care
The control group will not receive the patient decision aid prior to consultation with the physician.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Outcomes(composite): i) decision aid development, and ii) decision aid evaluation.
時間枠:Phase 1-2 (1- year)
|
Development of the decision aid will be guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF).
Evaluation will include the Decision Aid Acceptability questionnaire comprised of 10 items including comprehensibility, balance of presentation of information, and overall suitability.
|
Phase 1-2 (1- year)
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Pilot RCT (feasibility)
時間枠:Pre-Post consultation - participants will be followed until consultation is completed and at 3 months post consultation (average of 16 weeks)
|
In this feasibility RCT, the feasibility regarding processes (referral and recruitment rates, consent), key to the success of a larger study will be assessed.
This includes successful delivery of the decision aid in an efficient manner, the monitoring of resources (budget), and study management (trial coordination, human resources).
We will assess the proportion of patients who complete the decision aid, quality questionnaires, and missing data.
|
Pre-Post consultation - participants will be followed until consultation is completed and at 3 months post consultation (average of 16 weeks)
|
|
Decision quality measures
時間枠:Pre consultation (baseline visit)
|
Decision quality, the extent to which patients' decisions are informed (knowledge) and values based (values, preferences, decisional conflict).
|
Pre consultation (baseline visit)
|
|
Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)
時間枠:Pre and post consultation- (intervention and usual care group, baseline visit + 1 week post consult)
|
The Decisional Conflict Scale measures a person's perception of the difficulty in making a decision, the extent to which they feel uncertain about treatment options, are knowledgeable about the risks and benefits of options, clear about personal values, and supported in decision making.
The scale has good test-retest reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficients > 0.78) and predictive validity.
|
Pre and post consultation- (intervention and usual care group, baseline visit + 1 week post consult)
|
|
Sure Test
時間枠:Pre-consultation - baseline visit
|
The Sure Test is a 4 item decisional conflict screening tool designed for use in clinical practice.
The Sure Test is embedded in the decision aid (intervention group).
|
Pre-consultation - baseline visit
|
|
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
時間枠:Pre consultation - baseline visit (intervention and usual care)
|
The CES-D has 20 items that measure depressive symptoms.
The CES-D has good reliability and validity across community and clinical settings.
Associations between depressive symptoms and decision choice will be assessed.
|
Pre consultation - baseline visit (intervention and usual care)
|
|
Preparation for Decision Making scale
時間枠:Post consultation - up to two weeks post baseline visit (intervention group)
|
The Preparation for Decision Making Scale has 10 categorical items assessing the usefulness of the decision aid in preparing patients to communicate with a health professional.
|
Post consultation - up to two weeks post baseline visit (intervention group)
|
|
The Medical Outcomes Trust Short Form (SF-36v2)
時間枠:Pre consultation - baseline visit (intervention and usual care)
|
The SF-36 is a reliable and valid generic health related quality of life scale (HRQL) comprised of 36 items.
Associations between HRQL and decision choice will be undertaken.
|
Pre consultation - baseline visit (intervention and usual care)
|
その他の成果指標
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Vital status
時間枠:3 months post baseline visit
|
Alive, deceased
|
3 months post baseline visit
|
|
Implant status
時間枠:Phase 3, three months post baseline visit
|
Device status - implantable defibrillator/no implantable defibrillator, deferred
|
Phase 3, three months post baseline visit
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Sandra L Carroll, PhD、McMaster University
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Carroll SL, Stacey D, McGillion M, Healey JS, Foster G, Hutchings S, Arthur HM, Browne G, Thabane L. Evaluating the feasibility of conducting a trial using a patient decision aid in implantable cardioverter defibrillator candidates: a randomized controlled feasibility trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Nov 21;3:49. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0189-9. eCollection 2017.
- Carroll SL, McGillion M, Stacey D, Healey JS, Browne G, Arthur HM, Thabane L. Development and feasibility testing of decision support for patients who are candidates for a prophylactic implantable defibrillator: a study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013 Oct 22;14:346. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-346.
便利なリンク
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (見積もり)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。