Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Feasibility Testing of Decision Support for Patients Who Are Candidates for an Implantable Defibrillator

16 maart 2016 bijgewerkt door: Sandra Carroll, McMaster University

Development of and Feasibility Testing of Decision Support for Patients Who Are Candidates for an Implantable Defibrillator

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to a ventricular arrhythmia is a serious cause of cardiovascular death in Canada. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) offers high-risk patients a treatment option to reduce the incidence of SCD by delivering an internal shock to restore a normal rhythm, if needed. Definitive evidence has established the effectiveness of the ICD for reducing mortality when used as prophylaxis for SCD (a primary prevention indication). Approximately 3,700 new candidates accrue annually. Practice guidelines define the criteria to determine patient ICD candidacy for primary prevention. However, in addition to SCD risk, ICD candidates may have chronic diseases such as diabetes, renal insufficiency, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. Thus, balancing the benefits and risks of an ICD can become complex, particularly when competing mortality risks are present. Research has recognized human costs associated with device complications and shocks affecting psychological, health related quality of life (HRQL), and morbidity outcomes. The complexities surrounding the long-term benefits/risks, complications, replacements, and shocks, warrant decision support to prepare patients to make decisions. In Canada, there is no clear framework to support patients' decision-making in the context of ICD treatment options. Decision support, using a decision aid, could moderate treatment related uncertainty and prepare patients to make active, informed, quality decisions.

Objectives: 1) develop a decision aid for ICD candidates to support quality decision-making (informed, deliberate, values-based choices), 2) to evaluate the decision aid, and 3) to determine the feasibility of conducting a trial.

Studie Overzicht

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

82

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8P 2X2
        • Hamilton Health Sciences

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

18 jaar en ouder (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Referred for consideration of an ICD(non-CRT)for a primary prevention indication
  • English speaking
  • able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable to understand the decision aid due to a language barrier or visual impairment
  • referred for secondary prevention indication

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Onderzoek naar gezondheidsdiensten
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: Patient Decision Aid for an ICD (primary prevention, non-CRT)
The intervention group will receive the PtDA, which provides a lay summary that outlines the facts, risks, benefits (including probabilities), specific to the option of an implantable defibrillator or the option of medical management to prepare them for consultation with the physician. Values are assessed to reveal which features of each option are important to patients.
The intervention group will receive the PtDA, which provides a lay summary that outlines the facts, risks, benefits (including probabilities), specific to the option of an implantable defibrillator or the option of medical management to prepare them for consultation with the physician. Values are assessed to reveal which features of each option are important to patients.
Andere namen:
  • PtDA
Geen tussenkomst: Usual care
The control group will not receive the patient decision aid prior to consultation with the physician.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Primary Outcomes(composite): i) decision aid development, and ii) decision aid evaluation.
Tijdsspanne: Phase 1-2 (1- year)
Development of the decision aid will be guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF). Evaluation will include the Decision Aid Acceptability questionnaire comprised of 10 items including comprehensibility, balance of presentation of information, and overall suitability.
Phase 1-2 (1- year)

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Pilot RCT (feasibility)
Tijdsspanne: Pre-Post consultation - participants will be followed until consultation is completed and at 3 months post consultation (average of 16 weeks)
In this feasibility RCT, the feasibility regarding processes (referral and recruitment rates, consent), key to the success of a larger study will be assessed. This includes successful delivery of the decision aid in an efficient manner, the monitoring of resources (budget), and study management (trial coordination, human resources). We will assess the proportion of patients who complete the decision aid, quality questionnaires, and missing data.
Pre-Post consultation - participants will be followed until consultation is completed and at 3 months post consultation (average of 16 weeks)
Decision quality measures
Tijdsspanne: Pre consultation (baseline visit)
Decision quality, the extent to which patients' decisions are informed (knowledge) and values based (values, preferences, decisional conflict).
Pre consultation (baseline visit)
Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)
Tijdsspanne: Pre and post consultation- (intervention and usual care group, baseline visit + 1 week post consult)
The Decisional Conflict Scale measures a person's perception of the difficulty in making a decision, the extent to which they feel uncertain about treatment options, are knowledgeable about the risks and benefits of options, clear about personal values, and supported in decision making. The scale has good test-retest reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficients > 0.78) and predictive validity.
Pre and post consultation- (intervention and usual care group, baseline visit + 1 week post consult)
Sure Test
Tijdsspanne: Pre-consultation - baseline visit
The Sure Test is a 4 item decisional conflict screening tool designed for use in clinical practice. The Sure Test is embedded in the decision aid (intervention group).
Pre-consultation - baseline visit
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Tijdsspanne: Pre consultation - baseline visit (intervention and usual care)
The CES-D has 20 items that measure depressive symptoms. The CES-D has good reliability and validity across community and clinical settings. Associations between depressive symptoms and decision choice will be assessed.
Pre consultation - baseline visit (intervention and usual care)
Preparation for Decision Making scale
Tijdsspanne: Post consultation - up to two weeks post baseline visit (intervention group)
The Preparation for Decision Making Scale has 10 categorical items assessing the usefulness of the decision aid in preparing patients to communicate with a health professional.
Post consultation - up to two weeks post baseline visit (intervention group)
The Medical Outcomes Trust Short Form (SF-36v2)
Tijdsspanne: Pre consultation - baseline visit (intervention and usual care)
The SF-36 is a reliable and valid generic health related quality of life scale (HRQL) comprised of 36 items. Associations between HRQL and decision choice will be undertaken.
Pre consultation - baseline visit (intervention and usual care)

Andere uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Vital status
Tijdsspanne: 3 months post baseline visit
Alive, deceased
3 months post baseline visit
Implant status
Tijdsspanne: Phase 3, three months post baseline visit
Device status - implantable defibrillator/no implantable defibrillator, deferred
Phase 3, three months post baseline visit

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Sandra L Carroll, PhD, McMaster University

Publicaties en nuttige links

De persoon die verantwoordelijk is voor het invoeren van informatie over het onderzoek stelt deze publicaties vrijwillig ter beschikking. Dit kan gaan over alles wat met het onderzoek te maken heeft.

Nuttige links

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start

1 juni 2012

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 september 2014

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 december 2014

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

30 mei 2013

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

11 juni 2013

Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)

12 juni 2013

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Schatting)

17 maart 2016

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

16 maart 2016

Laatst geverifieerd

1 maart 2016

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • 12-214
  • 119449 Grant number (Ander subsidie-/financieringsnummer: Canadian Institutes of Health Research)

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

3
Abonneren