Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Feasibility Testing of Decision Support for Patients Who Are Candidates for an Implantable Defibrillator

16 de marzo de 2016 actualizado por: Sandra Carroll, McMaster University

Development of and Feasibility Testing of Decision Support for Patients Who Are Candidates for an Implantable Defibrillator

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to a ventricular arrhythmia is a serious cause of cardiovascular death in Canada. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) offers high-risk patients a treatment option to reduce the incidence of SCD by delivering an internal shock to restore a normal rhythm, if needed. Definitive evidence has established the effectiveness of the ICD for reducing mortality when used as prophylaxis for SCD (a primary prevention indication). Approximately 3,700 new candidates accrue annually. Practice guidelines define the criteria to determine patient ICD candidacy for primary prevention. However, in addition to SCD risk, ICD candidates may have chronic diseases such as diabetes, renal insufficiency, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. Thus, balancing the benefits and risks of an ICD can become complex, particularly when competing mortality risks are present. Research has recognized human costs associated with device complications and shocks affecting psychological, health related quality of life (HRQL), and morbidity outcomes. The complexities surrounding the long-term benefits/risks, complications, replacements, and shocks, warrant decision support to prepare patients to make decisions. In Canada, there is no clear framework to support patients' decision-making in the context of ICD treatment options. Decision support, using a decision aid, could moderate treatment related uncertainty and prepare patients to make active, informed, quality decisions.

Objectives: 1) develop a decision aid for ICD candidates to support quality decision-making (informed, deliberate, values-based choices), 2) to evaluate the decision aid, and 3) to determine the feasibility of conducting a trial.

Descripción general del estudio

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

82

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canadá, L8P 2X2
        • Hamilton Health Sciences

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Referred for consideration of an ICD(non-CRT)for a primary prevention indication
  • English speaking
  • able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable to understand the decision aid due to a language barrier or visual impairment
  • referred for secondary prevention indication

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Patient Decision Aid for an ICD (primary prevention, non-CRT)
The intervention group will receive the PtDA, which provides a lay summary that outlines the facts, risks, benefits (including probabilities), specific to the option of an implantable defibrillator or the option of medical management to prepare them for consultation with the physician. Values are assessed to reveal which features of each option are important to patients.
The intervention group will receive the PtDA, which provides a lay summary that outlines the facts, risks, benefits (including probabilities), specific to the option of an implantable defibrillator or the option of medical management to prepare them for consultation with the physician. Values are assessed to reveal which features of each option are important to patients.
Otros nombres:
  • PtDA
Sin intervención: Usual care
The control group will not receive the patient decision aid prior to consultation with the physician.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Primary Outcomes(composite): i) decision aid development, and ii) decision aid evaluation.
Periodo de tiempo: Phase 1-2 (1- year)
Development of the decision aid will be guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF). Evaluation will include the Decision Aid Acceptability questionnaire comprised of 10 items including comprehensibility, balance of presentation of information, and overall suitability.
Phase 1-2 (1- year)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Pilot RCT (feasibility)
Periodo de tiempo: Pre-Post consultation - participants will be followed until consultation is completed and at 3 months post consultation (average of 16 weeks)
In this feasibility RCT, the feasibility regarding processes (referral and recruitment rates, consent), key to the success of a larger study will be assessed. This includes successful delivery of the decision aid in an efficient manner, the monitoring of resources (budget), and study management (trial coordination, human resources). We will assess the proportion of patients who complete the decision aid, quality questionnaires, and missing data.
Pre-Post consultation - participants will be followed until consultation is completed and at 3 months post consultation (average of 16 weeks)
Decision quality measures
Periodo de tiempo: Pre consultation (baseline visit)
Decision quality, the extent to which patients' decisions are informed (knowledge) and values based (values, preferences, decisional conflict).
Pre consultation (baseline visit)
Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS)
Periodo de tiempo: Pre and post consultation- (intervention and usual care group, baseline visit + 1 week post consult)
The Decisional Conflict Scale measures a person's perception of the difficulty in making a decision, the extent to which they feel uncertain about treatment options, are knowledgeable about the risks and benefits of options, clear about personal values, and supported in decision making. The scale has good test-retest reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficients > 0.78) and predictive validity.
Pre and post consultation- (intervention and usual care group, baseline visit + 1 week post consult)
Sure Test
Periodo de tiempo: Pre-consultation - baseline visit
The Sure Test is a 4 item decisional conflict screening tool designed for use in clinical practice. The Sure Test is embedded in the decision aid (intervention group).
Pre-consultation - baseline visit
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Periodo de tiempo: Pre consultation - baseline visit (intervention and usual care)
The CES-D has 20 items that measure depressive symptoms. The CES-D has good reliability and validity across community and clinical settings. Associations between depressive symptoms and decision choice will be assessed.
Pre consultation - baseline visit (intervention and usual care)
Preparation for Decision Making scale
Periodo de tiempo: Post consultation - up to two weeks post baseline visit (intervention group)
The Preparation for Decision Making Scale has 10 categorical items assessing the usefulness of the decision aid in preparing patients to communicate with a health professional.
Post consultation - up to two weeks post baseline visit (intervention group)
The Medical Outcomes Trust Short Form (SF-36v2)
Periodo de tiempo: Pre consultation - baseline visit (intervention and usual care)
The SF-36 is a reliable and valid generic health related quality of life scale (HRQL) comprised of 36 items. Associations between HRQL and decision choice will be undertaken.
Pre consultation - baseline visit (intervention and usual care)

Otras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Vital status
Periodo de tiempo: 3 months post baseline visit
Alive, deceased
3 months post baseline visit
Implant status
Periodo de tiempo: Phase 3, three months post baseline visit
Device status - implantable defibrillator/no implantable defibrillator, deferred
Phase 3, three months post baseline visit

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Sandra L Carroll, PhD, McMaster University

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Enlaces Útiles

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de junio de 2012

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de septiembre de 2014

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de diciembre de 2014

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

30 de mayo de 2013

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

11 de junio de 2013

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

12 de junio de 2013

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Estimar)

17 de marzo de 2016

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

16 de marzo de 2016

Última verificación

1 de marzo de 2016

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 12-214
  • 119449 Grant number (Otro número de subvención/financiamiento: Canadian Institutes of Health Research)

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir