Implementing Shared Decision Making in Interprofessional Home Care Teams (IPSDM-SW)
Implementing Shared Decision Making in Interprofessional Home Care Teams : a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial
This study will train health providers in home care teams across Quebec in shared decision making about the decision to stay at home or move to another location. This decision is one of the toughest for older Canadians. Decisions that are informed, shared and supported produce better results. An interprofessional approach to shared decision making is when older persons and their caregivers are supported by not just one but by all the professionals involved in their care.The impact of the training program in interprofessional shared decision making (IPSDM) above that of the passive dissemination of a decision guide will be assessed by measuring to what extent older persons caregivers say they took active part in the decision-making process.
Other outcome measures will be:
i) what option they chose, whether they feel conflict or regret about their decision, and the burden of care they feel; ii) the quality of life of clients;
調査の概要
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Quebec
-
Québec、Quebec、カナダ、G1J 0A4
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval (CERSSPL-UL)
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 子
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
Clients or caregivers of clients :
- Aged ≥65 years;
- Receiving care from the IP home care team of the enrolled CISSS/CIUSSS
- Have made a decision about whether to stay at home or move to another location during the recruitment periods
- Are able to read, understand and write French or English
- Can give informed consent
In the case clients are not able to provide informed consent, their caregiver will be eligible.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Clients who are not able to provide informed consent and who don't have a caregiver
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:ヘルスサービス研究
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:クロスオーバー割り当て
- マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:Cluster A
IP-SDM training for health professionals (intervention at 4 months)
|
Multifaceted SDM training program for providers: i) 1.5-hour online tutorial, ii) 3.5-hour skills building workshop; iii) video-clip demonstrating SDM in the context of an IP home care team with an aging adult making a decision about location of care (to be used with clients and providers as well); and iv) performance feedback to providers (role play during the workshop).
|
|
実験的:Cluster B
IP-SDM training for health professionals (intervention at 11 months)
|
Multifaceted SDM training program for providers: i) 1.5-hour online tutorial, ii) 3.5-hour skills building workshop; iii) video-clip demonstrating SDM in the context of an IP home care team with an aging adult making a decision about location of care (to be used with clients and providers as well); and iv) performance feedback to providers (role play during the workshop).
|
|
実験的:Cluster C
IP-SDM training for health professionals (intervention at 18 months)
|
Multifaceted SDM training program for providers: i) 1.5-hour online tutorial, ii) 3.5-hour skills building workshop; iii) video-clip demonstrating SDM in the context of an IP home care team with an aging adult making a decision about location of care (to be used with clients and providers as well); and iv) performance feedback to providers (role play during the workshop).
|
|
実験的:Cluster D
IP-SDM training for health professionals (intervention at 25 months)
|
Multifaceted SDM training program for providers: i) 1.5-hour online tutorial, ii) 3.5-hour skills building workshop; iii) video-clip demonstrating SDM in the context of an IP home care team with an aging adult making a decision about location of care (to be used with clients and providers as well); and iv) performance feedback to providers (role play during the workshop).
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Assumed Role in decision making
時間枠:7 months
|
To assess the proportion of caregivers reporting an active role, a modified version of the Control Preferences Scale designed to assess the role assumed in the decision making process will be used.
The scale consists of a single question and is the one most frequently used in studies assessing the implementation of SDM in clinical practice.
|
7 months
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient involvement in decision making
時間枠:7 months
|
Assessed with the Dyadic-OPTION scale, a 12-item self-administered instrument that assesses 12 specific SDM behaviours during the decision-making process
|
7 months
|
|
Decisional Regret
時間枠:7 months
|
Assessed with the Decisional Regret Scale
|
7 months
|
|
Decisional Conflict
時間枠:7 months
|
Assessed with the Decisional Conflict Scale
|
7 months
|
|
Health-related quality of life
時間枠:7 months
|
Assessed with two subscales (Social isolation and Emotional reactions) of the HR-QoL questionnaire from the Nottingham Health Profile, clients only
|
7 months
|
|
Burden of care
時間枠:7 months
|
Assessed with the Zarit Burden Inventory Scale (ZBI), caregivers only
|
7 months
|
|
Preferred and chosen option (remain at home or move to another location)
時間枠:7 months
|
Questionnaire assessing the prefered and chosen option
|
7 months
|
協力者と研究者
捜査官
- 主任研究者:France Légaré, Ph. D.、Laval University
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Adisso EL, Taljaard M, Stacey D, Briere N, Zomahoun HTV, Durand PJ, Rivest LP, Legare F. Shared Decision-Making Training for Home Care Teams to Engage Frail Older Adults and Caregivers in Housing Decisions: Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial. JMIR Aging. 2022 Sep 20;5(3):e39386. doi: 10.2196/39386.
- Legare F, Briere N, Stacey D, Lacroix G, Desroches S, Dumont S, Fraser KD, Rivest LP, Durand PJ, Turcotte S, Taljaard M, Bourassa H, Roy L, Painchaud Guerard G. Implementing shared decision-making in interprofessional home care teams (the IPSDM-SW study): protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 24;6(11):e014023. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014023.
便利なリンク
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 2015-2016 01-01-E
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。