Implementing Shared Decision Making in Interprofessional Home Care Teams (IPSDM-SW)
2019年12月18日 更新者：France Legare、CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
Implementing Shared Decision Making in Interprofessional Home Care Teams : a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial
This study will train health providers in home care teams across Quebec in shared decision making about the decision to stay at home or move to another location. This decision is one of the toughest for older Canadians. Decisions that are informed, shared and supported produce better results. An interprofessional approach to shared decision making is when older persons and their caregivers are supported by not just one but by all the professionals involved in their care.The impact of the training program in interprofessional shared decision making (IPSDM) above that of the passive dissemination of a decision guide will be assessed by measuring to what extent older persons caregivers say they took active part in the decision-making process.
Other outcome measures will be:
i) what option they chose, whether they feel conflict or regret about their decision, and the burden of care they feel; ii) the quality of life of clients;
研究概览
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
653
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Quebec
-
Québec、Quebec、加拿大、G1J 0A4
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval (CERSSPL-UL)
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 孩子
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
是的
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
Clients or caregivers of clients :
- Aged ≥65 years;
- Receiving care from the IP home care team of the enrolled CISSS/CIUSSS
- Have made a decision about whether to stay at home or move to another location during the recruitment periods
- Are able to read, understand and write French or English
- Can give informed consent
In the case clients are not able to provide informed consent, their caregiver will be eligible.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Clients who are not able to provide informed consent and who don't have a caregiver
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：卫生服务研究
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：交叉作业
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Cluster A
IP-SDM training for health professionals (intervention at 4 months)
|
Multifaceted SDM training program for providers: i) 1.5-hour online tutorial, ii) 3.5-hour skills building workshop; iii) video-clip demonstrating SDM in the context of an IP home care team with an aging adult making a decision about location of care (to be used with clients and providers as well); and iv) performance feedback to providers (role play during the workshop).
|
|
实验性的：Cluster B
IP-SDM training for health professionals (intervention at 11 months)
|
Multifaceted SDM training program for providers: i) 1.5-hour online tutorial, ii) 3.5-hour skills building workshop; iii) video-clip demonstrating SDM in the context of an IP home care team with an aging adult making a decision about location of care (to be used with clients and providers as well); and iv) performance feedback to providers (role play during the workshop).
|
|
实验性的：Cluster C
IP-SDM training for health professionals (intervention at 18 months)
|
Multifaceted SDM training program for providers: i) 1.5-hour online tutorial, ii) 3.5-hour skills building workshop; iii) video-clip demonstrating SDM in the context of an IP home care team with an aging adult making a decision about location of care (to be used with clients and providers as well); and iv) performance feedback to providers (role play during the workshop).
|
|
实验性的：Cluster D
IP-SDM training for health professionals (intervention at 25 months)
|
Multifaceted SDM training program for providers: i) 1.5-hour online tutorial, ii) 3.5-hour skills building workshop; iii) video-clip demonstrating SDM in the context of an IP home care team with an aging adult making a decision about location of care (to be used with clients and providers as well); and iv) performance feedback to providers (role play during the workshop).
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Assumed Role in decision making
大体时间：7 months
|
To assess the proportion of caregivers reporting an active role, a modified version of the Control Preferences Scale designed to assess the role assumed in the decision making process will be used.
The scale consists of a single question and is the one most frequently used in studies assessing the implementation of SDM in clinical practice.
|
7 months
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient involvement in decision making
大体时间：7 months
|
Assessed with the Dyadic-OPTION scale, a 12-item self-administered instrument that assesses 12 specific SDM behaviours during the decision-making process
|
7 months
|
|
Decisional Regret
大体时间：7 months
|
Assessed with the Decisional Regret Scale
|
7 months
|
|
Decisional Conflict
大体时间：7 months
|
Assessed with the Decisional Conflict Scale
|
7 months
|
|
Health-related quality of life
大体时间：7 months
|
Assessed with two subscales (Social isolation and Emotional reactions) of the HR-QoL questionnaire from the Nottingham Health Profile, clients only
|
7 months
|
|
Burden of care
大体时间：7 months
|
Assessed with the Zarit Burden Inventory Scale (ZBI), caregivers only
|
7 months
|
|
Preferred and chosen option (remain at home or move to another location)
大体时间：7 months
|
Questionnaire assessing the prefered and chosen option
|
7 months
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
调查人员
- 首席研究员：France Légaré, Ph. D.、Laval University
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
一般刊物
- Adisso EL, Taljaard M, Stacey D, Briere N, Zomahoun HTV, Durand PJ, Rivest LP, Legare F. Shared Decision-Making Training for Home Care Teams to Engage Frail Older Adults and Caregivers in Housing Decisions: Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial. JMIR Aging. 2022 Sep 20;5(3):e39386. doi: 10.2196/39386.
- Legare F, Briere N, Stacey D, Lacroix G, Desroches S, Dumont S, Fraser KD, Rivest LP, Durand PJ, Turcotte S, Taljaard M, Bourassa H, Roy L, Painchaud Guerard G. Implementing shared decision-making in interprofessional home care teams (the IPSDM-SW study): protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 24;6(11):e014023. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014023.
有用的网址
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2015年11月1日
初级完成 (实际的)
2018年12月1日
研究完成 (实际的)
2018年12月1日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2015年10月28日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2015年10月29日
首次发布 (估计)
2015年10月30日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2019年12月20日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2019年12月18日
最后验证
2019年12月1日
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- 2015-2016 01-01-E
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.